DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

미국 산업안전보건법에서 일반의무조항의 제정배경과 운용에 관한 연구

A Study on Legislation Background and Application of the General Duty Clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act in U.S.

  • 정진우 (고용노동부 성남고용노동지청)
  • Jung, Jinwoo (Seongnam District Employment and Labor Office, Ministry of Employment and Labor)
  • 투고 : 2013.10.21
  • 심사 : 2014.05.07
  • 발행 : 2015.02.28

초록

The primary purpose of the general duty clause is to offer an extra measure of protection to employees in the workplace. Most standards implemented under OSHA are targeted at a specific hazard. The general duty clause, however allows inspectors to cite employers for exposing its employees to a recognized hazard that has not been specifically addressed in the regulations. Congress intended the general duty clause to be a limited means of advancing the purposes of the OSHAct. But OSHA has not always regarded the general duty clause as the limited means for protecting the safety and health of employees that Congress intented. OSHA attempted to expand the scope of the general duty clause, at times improperly, to make it a more flexible enforcement tool. OSHA's interpretation of each of the restrictions on the scope of the clause has changed over the years. In recent years the general duty clause has been utilized as a sometimes controversial mechanism for enforcement of safety guidelines that have not yet been specifically addressed by statute or regulation. The most notable example of this was application of the general duty clause to ergonomic hazards.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. C. Hament, B. Wolffe and J. M. McGuire, "Employer Rights and Obligations under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, Business Law Monographs", Vol. 15, $\S$1. 01, p. 1, 1991.
  2. D. L. Morgan and M. L. Duvall, "Forum: OSHA's General Duty Clause: An Analysis of its Use and Abuse", Industrial Relations Law Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 287-290, 1983.
  3. H. R. Rep. No. 91-1291, pp. 21-22, 1970.
  4. D. L. Morgan and M. L. Duvall, "Forum: OSHA's General Duty Clause: An Analysis of its Use and Abuse", Industrial Relations Law Journal, Vol. 5, p. 290, 1983.
  5. H. R. Rep. No. 91-1291, p. 21, 1970.
  6. J. B. Hood and B. A. Hardy and H. S. Harold, "Workers Compensation and Employee Protection Laws", West Publishing Co., p. 1, 1990
  7. H. D. Thoreau, "OccupationalHealth Risks and the Worker's Right to Know", The YaleLaw Journal, Vol. 90, p. 1803, 1981.
  8. OSHA, "Compliance Operations Manual", ch. VIII $\S$ A. 2.c., 1972.
  9. W. B. Connolly and D. R. Crowell, "A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO THE OCCUPATOIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT", Law Journal Press, 4-29, 2011.
  10. J. L. Hirsch, "OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH HANDBOOK", LexisNexis, $\S$6-4, 2007.
  11. M. A. Rothstein, "Occupational Safety and Health Law", Thomson West, pp. 227-228, 2005.
  12. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft, 8 OSHC 1329, 1980 OSHD 24, 447, 1980.
  13. J. L. Hirsch, "OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH HANDBOOK", LexisNexis, $\S$6-3, 2007.
  14. D. L. Morgan and M. L. Duvall, "Forum: OSHA's General Duty Clause: An Analysis of its Use and Abuse", Industrial Relations Law Journal, Vol 5, p. 299, 1983.
  15. D. J. Kolesar, "Cumulative Trauma Disorders: OSHA's General Duty Clause and the Need for an Ergonomics Standard", Michigan Law Review, Vol 90, p. 2086, 1992.
  16. REA Express Inc. v. Brennan, 495 F. 2d 822, 1 OSHC 1651, 2d Cir, 1974
  17. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. OSHRC, 607F . 2d 1069, 1 OSHC 1833, 3d Cir. 1979.
  18. Ensign-Bickford Co. v. OSHRC, 717 F. 2d 1419, D.C.Cir. 1983
  19. Donovan v. Royal Logging Co., 645 F. 2d 822, 831-32(9th Cir.1981)
  20. Drilling Corp., 9 OSHC 1681, 1981 OSHD 25, 363, 1981.
  21. 489 F. 2d 1257, 1266-1267 n. 37, D.C.Cir.1973.
  22. M. A. Bailey, "Occupational Safety and Health Law Handbook", Government Institutes, pp. 91-92, 2008.
  23. OSHA, OSHA's Field Operations Manual(FOM), 4-18, 2011.
  24. Senate Comm. on Labor and Public Welfare, Legislative History of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 92d Cong, 1st Sess., 1971.
  25. OSHA, OSHA's Field Operations Manual(FOM), 4-19, 2011.
  26. W. B. Connolly and D. R. Crowell, "A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO THE OCCUPATOIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT", Law Journal Press, 4-29, 2011.
  27. W. B. Connolly and D. R. Crowell, "A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO THE OCCUPATOIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT", Law Journal Press, 4-29, 2011.
  28. OCAW v. American Cyanamid Co., 741 F. 2d 444, D.C.Cir.1984.
  29. 9 OSHC 1596, 1981 OSHD 25, 338, 1985, affirmed 741 F. 2d 444, D.C.Cir.1984.
  30. M. A. Rothstein, "Occupational Safety and Health Law", Thomson West, p. 236, 2006.
  31. Usery, 568 F. 2d 910, 2d Cir.1977.
  32. M. A. Rothstein, "Occupational Safety and Health Law", Thomson West, p. 238, 2006.
  33. 494 F. 2d 460, 463, 8th Cir.1974.
  34. Brennan v. OSHRC(Vy Lactos Laboratories, Inc.), 494 F. 2d 460, 8th Cir. 1974.
  35. American Smelting & Ref. Co. v. OSHRC, 501 F. 2d 504, 515, 8th Cir.1974
  36. Titanium Metals Corp. v. Usery, 507 F.2d 536, 543, 9th Cir.1978.
  37. D. L. Morgan and M. L. Duvall, "Forum: OSHA's General Duty Clause: An Analysis of its Use and Abuse", Industrial Relations Law Journal, Vol. 5, p. 311, 1983.
  38. R. S. Morey, "The General Duty Clause of the OSHA of 1970", Harvard Law Review, Vol. 86, pp. 997-998, 1973.
  39. Anning-Johnson Co. v. OSHRC, 516 F. 2d 1081, 1086, 7th Cir.1975.
  40. D. L. Morgan and M. L. Duvall, "Forum: OSHA's General Duty Clause: An Analysis of its Use and Abuse", Industrial Relations Law Journal, Vol 5, pp. 297, 311, 316, 1983.
  41. National Realty & Construction v. OSHRC, 489 F. 2d 1257, D.C.Cir.1973.
  42. J. L. Hirsch, "OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH HANDBOOK", LexisNexis, $\S$6-6, 2007.
  43. M. A. Bailey, "Occupational Safety and Health Law Handbook", Government Institutes, p. 85, 2008.
  44. J. L. Hirsch, "OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH HANDBOOK", LexisNexis, $\S$6-5, 2007.
  45. D. L. Morgan and M. L. Duvall, "Forum: OSHA's General Duty Clause: An Analysis of its Use and Abuse", Industrial Relations Law Journal, Vol 5, p. 293, 1983.
  46. D. L. Morgan and M. L. Duvall, "Forum: OSHA's General Duty Clause: An Analysis of its Use and Abuse", Industrial Relations Law Journal, Vol 5, pp. 315-316, 1983.