Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine (대한물리의학회지)

The Korean Society of Physical Medicine (대한물리의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of The preparation and Review Times on the Some Items of The gross Motor Function Measure evaluation capacity of the College Students

대학생들의 예·복습 시간이 Gross Motor Function Measure의 일부 항목평가 능력에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Han Suk (Department of Physical therapy, Eulji University) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Joo (Department of Early Childhood Eucation, Eulji University)
  • 이한숙 (을지대학교 보건과학대학 물리치료학과) ;
  • 김은주 (을지대학교 보건산업대학 유아교육학과)
  • Received : 2015.01.09
  • Accepted : 2015.02.06
  • Published : 2015.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the differenceof GMFM evaluationcapacity according to the preparation and review times on the college students. METHODS: 58 subjects among physical therapymajor studentswere recruited. The group was constructed the fourgroupsbypreparation and review times. The firstgroup was less than 1hour, the second group wasmore than 1 hour ~ less than 2 hours, the third group was more than 2 hours ~ less than 3 hours, the fourth group was more than 3 hours that was preparation and reviewtimes. The students were performed GMFM evaluation capacity after they learned the normal motor development for 5 weeks and evaluation method. They continued the preparation and review learning about the lesson during 5 weeks. RESULTS: The group of more than 3 hours was the highest and next order was the group of more than 1 hour ~ less than 2 hours, group of less than 1hour on GMFM evaluation capacity. CONCLUSION: Preparation and review times improved the GMFM evaluation capacity of students. Therefore, Emphasizing the preparation and review of learning is proper way to increase the evaluation capacity. In addition, the professor should create the appropriate teaching strategies using preparation and review times to upgrade a learner's ability.

Keywords

References

  1. Avery LM, Russell DJ, Raina PS, et al. Rasch analysis of the gross motor function measure: validating the assumptions of the rasch model to create an interval-level Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(5):697-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(02)04896-7
  2. Bjornson KF, Graubert CS, Buford VL, et al. Validity of the Gross Motor Function Measure. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1998;10(2):43-7.
  3. Cooper CR. Holistic evaluation of writing. Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, judging. National Council of Teachers of English. USA. 1977
  4. Damiano DL, Abel MF. Relation of gait analysis to gross motor function in cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 1996;38(5):389-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15097.x
  5. Franjoine MR, Gunther JS, Taylor MJ. Pediatric balance scale:a modified version of the berg balance scale for theschool-age child with mild to moderate motorimpairment. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2003;15(2):114-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PEP.0000068117.48023.18
  6. Hwang R, Kim GW. The study on the raterreliabilities of physical therapy student pediatric balance scales items. J Kor Soc PhysTher. 2013;8(1):137-45.
  7. Kim DH, Kim SU. Curriculum and Assessment. Seoul, Hakjisa, 2005.
  8. Kim GW, Kim JY, Beak SG. The Reliability of a Pediatric Balance Scale Based on the raters clinical work experience and test experience. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(6):35-42. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.22.35
  9. Ko JY, Oh MH. Korean version of gross motor function measure. Seoul, Hakjisa, 2013.
  10. Lee SM. The effect of learning achievement in mathematics by repeated learning-Through preview and review-centered teaching. Mokpo National University. Master's Degree. 2003.
  11. Lee DJ. The research for positive effect of instruction using advance learning worksheets and review worksheets on educational achievement. Kook Min University. Master's Degree. 2010.
  12. Lee BH, Ko JY. The Characteristics of Gross Development in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Journal of special education & Rehabilitation Science. 2009;48(2):89-113.
  13. Lim JE. Prerequisite Learning and theFollowing-up learning that have Effects onScholastic Achievements & Learning Attitudes. Dogguk University. Master's Degree. 2013.
  14. Park HJ, Yi CH, Cho SH, et al. Physicaal therapist's understanding and the usage of assessment tools for children with delayed development and cerebral palsy. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2000;7(1):1-21.
  15. Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Hanna SE, et al. Prognosis for gross motor function in cerebral palsy: creation of motor development curves. Jama. 2002;288(11):1357-63. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.11.1357
  16. Seong TJ. Validity and Reliability. Seoul, Hakjisa, 2002.

Cited by

  1. The Effects of Hippotherapy for Physical, Cognitive and Psychological Factors in Children with Intellectual Disabilities vol.12, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2017.12.3.119