Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • Volume 37
  • /
  • Pages.32.1-32.5
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of bone formation and membrane degradation in guided bone regeneration using a 4-hexylresorcinol-incorporated silk fabric membrane

  • Lee, Sang-Woon (Department of Dentistry, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Um, In Chul (Department of Bio-fibers and Materials Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Gon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cha, Min-Sang (Department of Dentistry, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2015.08.03
  • Accepted : 2015.09.21
  • Published : 2015.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The aims of present study were (1) to evaluate new bone formation among the 4-hexylresorcinol (4HR)-incorporated silk fabric membrane (SFM), conventional SFM, and uncovered control groups and (2) to compare the amount of residual membrane between the 4HR-incorporated SFM and conventional SFM in a rabbit parietal defect model. Methods: Nine New Zealand white rabbits were used for this animal study. After the formation of a bilateral parietal bone defect (diameter 8.0 mm), either 4HR-incorporated SFM or conventional SFM was grafted into the defect. The defect in the control was left uncovered. New bone formation and the amount of residual membrane were evaluated by histomorphometry at 8 weeks after the operation. Results: The total amount of new bone was $37.84{\pm}8.30%$ in the control, $56.64{\pm}15.74%$ in the 4HR-incorporated SFM group, and $53.35{\pm}10.52%$ in the conventional SFM group 8 weeks after the operation. The differences were significant between the control and 4HR-incorporated SFM group (P = 0.016) and between the control and conventional SFM group (P = 0.040). The residual membrane was $75.08{\pm}10.52%$ in the 4HR-incorporated SFM group and $92.23{\pm}5.46%$ in the conventional SFM group 8 weeks after the operation. The difference was significant (P = 0.039). Conclusions: The 4HR-incorporated SFM and conventional SFM groups showed more bone regeneration than the control group. The incorporated 4HR accelerated the partial degradation of the silk fabric membrane in a rabbit parietal defect model 8 weeks after the operation.

Keywords

References

  1. Hermann JS, Buser D (1996) Guided bone regeneration for dental implants. Curr Opin Periodontol 3:168-77
  2. Lee SW, Kim SG (2014) Membranes for the guided bone regeneration. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 36:239-46 https://doi.org/10.14402/jkamprs.2014.36.6.239
  3. Song JY, Kim SG, Lee JW, Chae WS, Kweon H, Jo YY et al (2011) Accelerated healing with the use of a silk fibroin membrane for the guided bone regeneration technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 112:e26-e33
  4. Lee SW, Kim SG, Song JY, Kweon H, Jo YY, Lee KG et al (2013) Silk fibroin and 4-hexylresorcinol incorporation membrane for guided bone regeneration. J Craniofac Surg 24:1927-30 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a3050c
  5. Ha YY, Park YW, Kweon H, Jo YY, Kim SG (2014) Comparison of the physical properties and in vivo bioactivities of silkworm-cocoon-derived silk membrane, collagen membrane, and polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for guided bone regeneration. Macromol Res 22:1018-23 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-014-2138-2
  6. McNally D, Shephard A, Field E (2012) Randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled study of a single dose of an amylmetacresol/2, 4-dichlorobenzyl alcohol plus lidocaine lozenge or a hexylresorcinol lozenge for the treatment of acute sore throat due to upper respiratory tract infection. J Pharm Pharm Sci 15:281-94 https://doi.org/10.18433/J31309
  7. Kweon H, Kim SG, Choi JY (2014) Inhibition of foreign body giant cell formation by 4-hexylresorcinol through suppression of diacylglycerol kinase delta gene expression. Biomaterials 35:8576-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.050
  8. Kundu B, Rajkhowa R, Kundu SC, Wang X (2013) Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:457-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.043
  9. Altman GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C, Calabro T, Horan RL, Chen J et al (2003) Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 24:401-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00353-8
  10. Aramwit P, Kanokpanont S, De-Eknamkul W, Srichana T (2009) Monitoring of inflammatory mediators induced by silk sericin. J Biosci Bioeng 107:556-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2008.12.012
  11. Schwartzmann M (2000) Use of collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration: a review. Implant Dent 9:63-6 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200009010-00011
  12. Postlethwait R (1970) Long-term comparative study of nonabsorbable sutures. Ann Surg 171:892 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197006010-00010
  13. Cao Y, Wang B (2009) Biodegradation of silk biomaterials. Int J Mol Sci 10:1514-24 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10041514
  14. Lam K, Nijenhuis A, Bartels H, Postema A, Jonkman M, Pennings A et al (1995) Reinforced poly (L-lactic acid) fibres as suture material. J Appl Biomater 6:191-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/jab.770060308
  15. Salthouse TN, Matlaga BF, Wykoff MH (1977) Comparative tissue response to six suture materials in rabbit cornea, sclera, and ocular muscle. Am J Ophthalmol 84:224-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(77)90856-X
  16. Minoura N, Tsukada M, Nagura M (1990) Physico-chemical properties of silk fibroin membrane as a biomaterial. Biomaterials 11:430-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(90)90100-5
  17. Deodhar AK, Rana R (1997) Surgical physiology of wound healing: a review. J Postgrad Med 43:52

Cited by

  1. The effect of 4-hexylresorcinol on xenograft degradation in a rat calvarial defect model vol.38, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0076-y
  2. Spectroscopic determination of alkyl resorcinol concentration in hydroxyapatite composite vol.7, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-016-0089-2
  3. Reconstruction of partial maxillectomy defect with a buccal fat pad flap and application of 4-hexylresorcinol: a case report vol.42, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.6.370
  4. In vivo bone regeneration ability of different layers of natural silk cocoon processed using an eco-friendly method vol.25, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-017-5085-x
  5. Comparison of Bio-degradation for Ridge Preservation Using Silk Fibroin-based Grafts and a Collagen Plug vol.14, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-017-0055-0
  6. Silk Fibroin-Alginate-Hydroxyapatite Composite Particles in Bone Tissue Engineering Applications In Vivo vol.18, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040858
  7. Botulinum Toxin Conjugated With Silk Fibroin and 4-Hexylresorcinol vol.28, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003763
  8. Comparative study on bone regeneration between silk mat incorporated 4-hexylresorcinol and collagen membrane vol.34, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7852/ijie.2017.34.2.32
  9. 열처리가 강연사 제직 실크 직물의 기계적 성질에 주는 영향 vol.54, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12772/tse.2017.54.224
  10. Molecular weight-associated cellular response to silk fibroin fragments demonstrated in MG63 cells vol.35, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7852/ijie.2017.35.1.7
  11. Accelerated biodegradation of silk sutures through matrix metalloproteinase activation by incorporating 4-hexylresorcinol vol.7, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42441
  12. Effect of Sericin Content on the Structural Characteristics and Properties of Electro-spun Regenerated Silk vol.19, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-7861-4
  13. Silk Protein-Based Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration vol.8, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8081214
  14. Porcine Bone Incorporated With 4-Hexylresorcinol Increases New Bone Formation by Suppression of the Nuclear Factor Kappa B Signaling Pathway vol.29, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004517
  15. 4-Hexylresorcinol and silk sericin increase the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor via different pathways vol.9, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40027-5
  16. Strategies for Tuning the Biodegradation of Silk Fibroin-Based Materials for Tissue Engineering Applications vol.6, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01781
  17. Role of 4-Hexylresorcinol in the Field of Tissue Engineering vol.10, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103385
  18. 4-hexylresorcinol-induced protein expression changes in human umbilical cord vein endothelial cells as determined by immunoprecipitation high-performance liquid chromatography vol.15, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243975