Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • Volume 37
  • /
  • Pages.1.1-1.6
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Selective laser melted titanium implants: a new technique for the reconstruction of extensive zygomatic complex defects

  • Rotaru, Horatiu (Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy) ;
  • Schumacher, Ralf (School of Life Sciences, Institute for Medical and Analytical Technologies, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Gon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Dinu, Cristian (Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy)
  • Received : 2015.01.09
  • Accepted : 2015.01.09
  • Published : 2015.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The restoration of extensive zygomatic complex defects is a surgical challenge owing to the difficulty of accurately restoring the normal anatomy, symmetry, proper facial projection and facial width. In the present study, an extensive post-traumatic zygomatic bone defect was reconstructed using a custom-made implant that was made with a selective laser melting (SLM) technique. The computer-designed implant had the proper geometry and fit perfectly into the defect without requiring any intraoperative adjustments. A one-year follow-up revealed a stable outcome with no complications.

Keywords

References

  1. Ranganath K, Hemanth Kumar HR (2011) The correction of post-traumatic pan facial residual deformity. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 10:20-24 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-010-0088-6
  2. Quatela VC, Chow J (2008) Synthetic facial implants. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 16:1-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2007.09.002
  3. Tessier P, Kawamoto H, Matthews D, Posnick J, Raulo Y, Tulasne JF, et al (2005) Autogenous bone grafts and bone substitutes-tools and techniques: I. A 20,000-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:6S-24S https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000173862.20563.12
  4. Fan KL, Federico C, Kawamoto HK, Bradley JP (2012) Optimizing the timing and technique of Treacher Collins orbital malar reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 23(Suppl 1):2033-2037
  5. El-Khayat B, Eley KA, Shah KA, Watt-Smith SR (2010) Ewings sarcoma of the zygoma reconstructed with a gold prosthesis: a rare tumor and unique reconstruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:e5-e10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.004
  6. Ivy EJ, Lorenc ZP, Aston SJ (1995) Malar augmentation with silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:63-68 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199507000-00009
  7. Scolozzi P (2012) Maxillofacial reconstruction using polyetherketone patientspecific implants by "mirroring" computational planning. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:660-665 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9853-2
  8. Hoffmann J, Cornelius CP, Groten M, Proebster L, Phannenberg C, Schwenzer N (1998) Orbital reconstruction with individually copy-milled ceramic implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:604-612 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199803000-00006
  9. Rotaru H, Stan H, Florian IS, Scumacher R, Park YT, Kim SG, et al (2012) Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:e169-e176 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.036
  10. Herlin C, Doucet JC, Bigorre M, Khelifa HC, Captier G (2013) Computerassisted midface reconstruction in Treacher Collins syndrome part 1: skeletal reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41:670-675 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.007
  11. Benazzi S, Senck S (2011) Comparing 3-dimensional virtual methods for reconstruction in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1184-1194 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.028
  12. Yavari SA, Wauthle R, van der Stok J, Riemslag AC, Janssen M, Mulier M, et al (2013) Fatigue behavior of porous biomaterials manufactured using selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 33:4849-4858 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.08.006
  13. Matena J, Gieseke M, Kampmann A, Petersen S, Murua Escobar H, Sternberg K, et al (2013) Characterisation of Cell Growth on Titanium Scaffolds Made by Selective Laser Melting for Tissue Engineering. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2013 Sep 7. pii:/j/bmte.2013.58.issue-s1-C/bmt-2013-4047/bmt-2013-4047.xml. doi:10.1515/bmt-2013-4047.
  14. Burg KJ, Porter S, Kellam JF (2000) Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 21:2347-2359 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00102-2
  15. Bauer TW, Schils J (1999) The pathology of total joint arthroplasty. II. Mechanisms of implant failure. Skeletal Radiol 28:483-497 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050552

Cited by

  1. Update of patient-specific maxillofacial implant vol.23, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/moo.0000000000000175
  2. Osseointegration of three-dimensional designed titanium implants manufactured by selective laser melting vol.8, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/4/045014
  3. Bioactive treatment promotes osteoblast differentiation on titanium materials fabricated by selective laser melting technology vol.35, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-127
  4. Poly-ε-caprolactone Coated and Functionalized Porous Titanium and Magnesium Implants for Enhancing Angiogenesis in Critically Sized Bone Defects vol.17, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17010001
  5. Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of New Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials for Craniofacial Bone Reconstruction vol.27, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000002925
  6. Current and emerging applications of 3D printing in medicine vol.9, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7279
  7. Three-Dimensional Printing: Custom-Made Implants for Craniomaxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery vol.10, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1594277
  8. Evolution of design considerations in complex craniofacial reconstruction using patient-specific implants vol.231, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411916681346
  9. A customized fixation plate with novel structure designed by topological optimization for mandibular angle fracture based on finite element analysis vol.16, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0422-z
  10. Mandibular Reconstruction Using a Customized Three-Dimensional Titanium Implant Applied on the Lingual Surface of the Mandible vol.29, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004119
  11. Mandibular retrognathia correction using a fixed sagittal guidance appliance individually manufactured by selective laser melting manufacturing technology vol.24, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-10-2016-0163
  12. How does the surface treatment change the cytocompatibility of implants made by selective laser melting? vol.15, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2018.1456335
  13. Cleft Alveolus Reconstruction Using a Three-Dimensional Printed Bioresorbable Scaffold With Human Bone Marrow Cells vol.29, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004747
  14. Sterilization protocol for porous dental implants made by Selective Laser Melting vol.91, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-987
  15. Maxillofacial Reconstruction with Patient-specific Implants vol.53, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1309
  16. Understanding the basis of medical use of poly-lactide-based resorbable polymers and composites - a review of the clinical and metabolic impact vol.51, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/03602532.2019.1642911
  17. Comparison of condylar morphology changes and position stability following unilateral and bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism vol.15, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0202-z
  18. Surface modification of titanium manufactured through selective laser melting inhibited osteoclast differentiation through mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway vol.35, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328220920457
  19. Technical queries of a 3D design custom-made implant made from titanium particles for maxillofacial bone reconstruction vol.38, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2019.1578846
  20. Standardizing the patient-specific medical device design process via a paper-based pro-forma vol.6, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00013_1
  21. Schedule feasibility and workflow for additive manufacturing of titanium plates for ranioplasty in canine skull tumors vol.16, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02343-1
  22. Three-dimensional (3D) synthetic printing for the manufacture of non-biodegradable models, tools and implants used in surgery: a review of current methods vol.45, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2020.1838643
  23. Bone Conduction Capacity of Highly Porous 3D-Printed Titanium Scaffolds Based on Different Pore Designs vol.14, pp.14, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14143892
  24. Correction of facial asymmetry using a patient-specific three-dimensional printed polycarprolactone/beta tricalcium phosphate scaffold: a case report vol.45, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.45.03.202109.143
  25. Sequential dual-drug delivery of BMP-2 and alendronate from hydroxyapatite-collagen scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration vol.11, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80608-3
  26. Experimental validation of finite element simulation of a new custom-designed fixation plate to treat mandibular angle fracture vol.20, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-021-00851-1