DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

POINTWISE CROSS-SECTION-BASED ON-THE-FLY RESONANCE INTERFERENCE TREATMENT WITH INTERMEDIATE RESONANCE APPROXIMATION

  • BACHA, MEER (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • JOO, HAN GYU (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2015.04.14
  • Accepted : 2015.07.23
  • Published : 2015.12.25

Abstract

The effective cross sections (XSs) in the direct whole core calculation code nTRACER are evaluated by the equivalence theory-based resonance-integral-table method using the WIMS-based library as an alternative to the subgroup method. The background XSs, as well as the Dancoff correction factors, were evaluated by the enhanced neutron-current method. A method, with pointwise microscopic XSs on a union-lethargy grid, was used for the generation of resonance-interference factors (RIFs) for mixed resonant absorbers. This method was modified by the intermediate-resonance approximation by replacing the potential XSs for the non-absorbing moderator nuclides with the background XSs and neglecting the resonance-elastic scattering. The resonance-escape probability was implemented to incorporate the energy self-shielding effect in the spectrum. The XSs were improved using the proposed method as compared to the narrow resonance infinite massbased method. The RIFs were improved by 1% in $^{235}U$, 7% in $^{239}Pu$, and >2% in $^{240}Pu$. To account for thermal feedback, a new feature was incorporated with the interpolation of pre-generated RIFs at the multigroup level and the results compared with the conventional resonance-interference model. This method provided adequate results in terms of XSs and k-eff. The results were verified first by the comparison of RIFs with the exact RIFs, and then comparing the XSs with the McCARD calculations for the homogeneous configurations, with burned fuel containing a mixture of resonant nuclides at different burnups and temperatures. The RIFs and XSs for the mixture showed good agreement, which verified the accuracy of the RIF evaluation using the proposed method. The method was then verified by comparing the XSs for the virtual environment for reactor applicationbenchmark pin-cell problem, as well as the heterogeneous pin cell containing burned fuel with McCARD. The method works well for homogeneous, as well as heterogeneous configurations.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea

References

  1. R.J.J. Stamm'ler, M.J. Abbate, Methods of Steady-state Reactor Physics in Nuclear Design, Academic Press, London, 1983.
  2. D.G. Cacuci, Handbook of Nuclear Engineering, Springer, Berlin, 2010.
  3. H.G. Joo, G.Y. Kim, L. Pogosbekyan, Subgroup weight generation based on shielded pin-cell cross section conservation, Ann. Nucl. Energy 36 (2009) 859-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.03.017
  4. Y.S. Jung, C.B. Shim, C.H. Lim, H.G. Joo, Practical numerical reactor employing direct whole core neutron transport and sub-channel thermal/hydraulic solvers, Ann. Nucl. Energy 62 (2013) 357-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.06.031
  5. M.B. Chadwick, et al., ENDF/B-VII.0: next generation evaluated nuclear data library for Nuclear Science and Technology, Nucl. Data Sheets 107 (2006) 2931-3060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2006.11.001
  6. F. Leszczynski, D. Lopez Aldama, A. Trkov, WIMS Library Update, IAEA, Vienna, 2007.
  7. A. Yamamoto, Evaluation of background cross sections for heterogeneous and complicated geometry by the enhanced neutron current method, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 45 (2008) 1287-1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2008.9711916
  8. Z. Gao, Y. Xu, T.J. Downar, The treatment of resonance interference effects in the subgroup method, Ann. Nucl. Energy 38 (2011) 995-1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.01.019
  9. S. Choi, A. Khassenov, D.J. Lee, Resonance self-shielding method with resonance interference factor library, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. (Abstract) California (2014).
  10. M.L. Williams, Correction of multigroup cross sections for resolved resonance interference in mixed absorbers, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 83 (1983), 73-49.
  11. R.E. MacFarlane, et al., The NJOY Nuclear Data Processing System, Ver. 2012, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, 2012.
  12. K.O. Ott, W.A. Bezella, Introductory Nuclear Reactor Statics, American Nuclear Society, 555 North Kensington Avenue, La Grange Park, Illinois, USA, 1989.
  13. H.J. Shim, B.S. Han, J.S. Jung, H.J. Park, C.H. Kim, McCARD: Monte Carlo code for advanced reactor design and analysis, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 44 (2012) 161-176. https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.01.2012.503
  14. A.T. Godfrey, VERA Core Physics Benchmark Progression Problem Specifications, CASL-U-2012-0131-003, 2014.