한국주거학회논문집 (Journal of the Korean housing association)

  • 제26권1호
  • /
  • Pages.53-60
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2234-3571(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2257(eISSN)
한국주거학회 (The Korean Housing Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

주거공동체에 대한 애착과 신뢰의 영향요인 분석 - 친밀권역(intimacy zone)의 회복을 위한 시각 -

Analysis of Place Attachment and Trust in Residential Community - Developing Strategies for the Revitalization of Intimacy Zone -

  • Lee, Jong Soo (Dept. of Public Administration, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2014.10.27
  • 심사 : 2014.12.31
  • 발행 : 2015.02.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Community is crucial for human beings not only because they are born with communal self but also because social cooperation is more efficient than competition in many cases. Human beings are defined as Homo communicus living in residential community which is important for the fulfillment of their primary needs. Residential community is an 'intimacy zone' where personal and emotional interactions are made. This study aims at examining the health of residential community in Korea by exploring the level of place attachment and neighborhood trust. Previous studies indicate that place attachment and trust are influenced by three dimensions such as residents' characteristics, house types and regional environment. This study conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey and it shows that place attachment moulds neighborhood trust. The results of path analysis demonstrates that place attachment and trust appear high in detached house areas. Age of residents also gives positive influence on the level of place attachment and neighbourhood trust. This result gives significant policy implications for the development of residential community in Korea. Residential community as an intimacy zone has been eroded and desperately needs to be revitalized. For this, more concern should be given to the issue of desirable size of residential community and the types of houses. Detached house area must be supported by governmental policies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 최열 (2003). 주택규모 만족도 결정요인 분석. 부산광역시 정책연구실, 기획연구 03-2.
  2. Askins, K. & Pain, R. (2011). Contact zones: participation, materiality, and the messiness of interaction. Environment and planning D, 29, 803-821. https://doi.org/10.1068/d11109
  3. Axelrod, R. (2006). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
  4. Bonauito, M., Fornara, F. & Bonnes, M. (2006). Perceived residential environment quality in middle- and low-extension Italian Cities. Revoe Europeene de Psychologie Applicuee, 56, 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2005.02.011
  5. Brown, D.M. (2013). Young People, Anti-social Behaviour and Public Space: The Role of Community Wardens in Policing the 'ASBO Generation'. Urban Studies, 50(3), 538-555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012468899
  6. Choi, Y.B. & Min, B.I. (2008). Determinants of Disparity between Housing Satisfaction and Sale Price of Apartment. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 12(1), 323-349.
  7. Gerundo, T.P. (2002). An Examination of Housing Satisfaction among Mental Health Consumers in Meriden, Connecticut, unpublished Master's thesis, Southern Connecticut State University.
  8. Ha, S.K. (2009). Social Capital Across Different Housing Tenure and Community Revitalization in Seoul. Housing Studies Review, 17(4), 77-94.
  9. Hidalgo, M.C. & Hemandez, B. (2001). Place Attachment: conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
  10. Hur, M. & Morrow-Jones, H. (2008). Factors that Infuluence Residents' Satisfaction with Neighborhoods. Environment and Behavior, 40, 619-635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507307483
  11. Kleinhans, R., Priemus, H. & Engbersen, G. (2007). Understanding Social Capital in Recently Restructured Urban Neighbourhoods: Two Case Studies in Rotterdam. Urban Studies, May 44, 1069-1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701256047
  12. Lee, J.S. (2010). Emergence of Communitarianism and Its Discourse with Liberalism. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 14(3) 5-22.
  13. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place Attachment: How Far Have We Come in the Last 40 Years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
  14. Marie, I. H. & Tjora A. (2014). Interaction Pretext: Experiences of Community in the Urban Neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 51(10), 2111-2124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013505891
  15. Middleton, A., Murie, A. & Groves, R. (2005). Social capital and neighborhoods that work. Urban Studies, 42(10), 1711-1738. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500231589
  16. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Park, S.R. (2014). Place Attachment, Sense of Community and Housing Satisfaction of Natives and Immigrants on the Urban Redevelopments. unpublished Master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul.
  18. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

피인용 문헌

  1. A Study on the Subjective Happiness and Social Capital vol.26, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2015.26.3.099