The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Affecting on Student Math Self-efficacy of Korea and Singapore based on PISA 2012

PISA 2012에서 나타난 한국과 싱가포르 학생의 수학 자아효능감에 대한 영향 요인

  • Received : 2014.10.14
  • Accepted : 2015.01.12
  • Published : 2015.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PISA 2012 showed that while Korean students achieved high-level math achievement in mathematics their levels are relatively lower in math self-efficacy. Students from Singapore, on the other hand, achieved high scores both in math achievement and in math self-efficacy. The results of the two countries differed although both countries has been sharing the same East Asian cultural sphere. This study analyzed the input and the process variables on the student- and school-level concerning math self-efficacy. The results were as follows. In Korea, math interest, instrumental motivation, elaboration strategies, applied and pure math tasks were the student-level variables that affected math self-efficacy. In Singapore, math interest, control strategies, elaboration strategies, applied and pure math tasks were the student-level variables that affected mathematics self-efficacy. Math club, teachers' low expectations were the school-level variables that affected math self-efficacy. For a higher-level of math self-efficacy in Korea, it is important to encourage students not only to use control strategies, but to participate in math clubs. It is equally important for teachers to have higher expectations towards students.

Keywords

References

  1. 강대중, 염시창 (2013). PISA 2009읽기성취도 데이터를 활용한 학교효과 분석, 교과교육학연구 17(2), 323-345.(Kang, D. J. & Yum, S. C. (2013). An analysis of school effects bases on reading achievement data from PISA 2009. Research in Curriculum Instruction 17(2). 323-345.)
  2. 류희찬, 이광호, 강윤수, 박선용, 신인선, 신재홍 (2012). 외국의 수학교육현황 조사연구. 정책연구 2012-6.(Lyou, H. C., Lee, G. H., Kang, Y. S., Park, S. Y., Shin, Y. S. & Shin, J. H. (2013). A study on current status of mathematics education around the world. Policy Research 2012-6.)
  3. 문은영 (2010). 자기조절학습전략 훈련이 중학생의 사회과 학업성취도와 자기효능감에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교.(Moon, E. Y. (2010). The effect of self-regulated learning program on middle school student's social study academic achievement and self-efficacy. Ewha Woman's University.)
  4. 박선화, 김명화, 주미경 (2010). 수학에 대한 정의적 특성 향상 방안연구, 한국교육과정평가원 RRI 2010-9.(Park, S. H. Kim. M. H. & Ju. M. K. (2010). A study on affective characteristics toward mathematics. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation RRI 2010-9.)
  5. 봉미미, 황아름, 송주연 (2010). 학생들의 자기효능감과 성취목표 형성에 영향을 주는 교사의 말과 행동, 교육방법연구 22, 167-193.(Bong, M. M, Hwang, A. & Song, J. Y. (2010). Teachers' comments and behaviors that influence students' self-efficacy and achievement goal formation. Research of Instructional method 22. 167-193.)
  6. 송미영, 임해미, 최혁준, 박혜영, 손수경 (2013). OECD국제학업성취도 평가 연구: PISA 2012 결과보고서, 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2013-6-1.(Song, M. Y., Rim, H. M., Choi, H. J., Park. H. Y. & Son, S. (2013). OECD Programme for international students assessment: analyzing PISA 2012 results. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. Research Report RRE 2013-6-1.)
  7. 이종희, 김수진 (2010). PISA 2003결과에서 수학의 정의적 영역에 영향을 주는 변인 분석, 대한수학교육학회지 학교수학 12(2), 219-237.(Lee, C. H. & Kim, S. J. (2010). Analysis of affective factors on mathematics learning according to the results of PISA 2003. Journal of Korea Society of Education Studies in Mathematics. School Mathematics 12(2), 219-237.)
  8. 이용남, 정환금, 송기주, 박분희, 강만철, 신현숙, 신의정, 이영길, 정창윤, 이현욱, 이민영, 정일선, 오익수 (2004). 교육 및 상담심리학, 경기도: 교육과학사.(Lee, Y. N., Cheong, H. K., Song, K. J., Park, B. H., Kang, M. C., Shin, H. S., Shin, U. J., Lee, Y. K., Chung, C. W., Lee, H. W., Lee, M. Y., Chung, Y.S. & Oh, I. S. (2004). Educational and counseling psychology. GyeongGi Do: Kyoyookgwahaksa.)
  9. 윤정일, 이범수 (2006). PISA 2003 학업성취도 결정요인 국제비교연구: 한국, 일본, 미국, 독일, 핀란드를 중심으로, 교육행정학연구 24(2). 523-548.(Yun, Ch. I. & Lee, B. S. (2006). International comparative study on academic achievement determinants of PISA 2003: Focusing on Korean, Japan, the United States, Germany, and Finland. The Journal of Educational Administration. 24(2). 523-548.)
  10. 조지민, 옥현진, 이상하, 임효진, 차성현, 김동원, 임재근, 손수경 (2012). 국제 학업성취도 평가 결과에 기반한 교육정책 개선 방안, 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 CRE 2012-1.(Cho, J. M., Ok, H. J., Lee, S. H., Rim, H. J., Cha, S. H., Kim, D. W., Lim, J. K. & Son, S. K. (2012). A study on the improvement plans of education policy- based on the results of PISA. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. Research Report CRE 2012_1.)
  11. 최승현, 구자옥, 김주훈, 박상욱, 오은순, 김재우(2013). PISA와 TIMSS 결과에 기반한 우리나라 학생의 정의적 특성 함양 방안. 한국 교육과정평가원. 연구보고 RRE 2013-8.(Choi, S. H., Goo, J. O., Kim, J. H., Park, S. O., Oh, E. S. & Kim, J. W. (2013). Strategies for improving the affective characteristics of Korean students based on the results of PISA and TIMSS. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. Research Report RRE 2013-8.)
  12. Adler-Constantinescu, C., Besu, E.-C., & Negovan, V. (2013). Perceived social support and perceived self-efficacy during adolescence. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume 78(2013), 275-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.294
  13. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  14. Bonitz, V. S., Larson, L. M., & Armstrong, P. I.. (2010). Interest, self-efficacy, and choice goals: An experimental manipulation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.09.003
  15. Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.009
  16. Lin, T.-J. Tan, A. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A cross-cultural comparison of Singaporean and Taiwanese English graders' science learning self-efficacy from a multi-dimensional perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1083-1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.776193
  17. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
  18. OECD (2013a). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do - student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol. I). Paris: OECD
  19. OECD (2013b). Students engagement, drive and self-beliefs (Vol. III). Paris: OECD.
  20. Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  21. Pokay, P., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.41
  22. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling [computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  23. Schulz, W. (2005). Mathematics self-efficacy and student expectations. results from PISA 2003. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). Montreal.

Cited by

  1. 스크래치 활용 게임 프로그래밍 학습이 수학교과 흥미와 가치인식에 미치는 영향 vol.21, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.2.199