Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the compatibility between one-bottle dentin adhesives and composite resins using micro-shear bond strength

  • Song, Minju (Department of Conservative Dentistry Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital) ;
  • Shin, Yooseok (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital) ;
  • Roh, Byoung-Duck (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2014.05.21
  • Accepted : 2014.08.12
  • Published : 2015.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study was performed to determine whether the combined use of one-bottle self-etch adhesives and composite resins from same manufacturers have better bond strengths than combinations of adhesive and resins from different manufacturers. Materials and Methods: 25 experimental micro-shear bond test groups were made from combinations of five dentin adhesives and five composite resins with extracted human molars stored in saline for 24 hr. Testing was performed using the wire-loop method and a universal testing machine. Bond strength data was statistically analyzed using two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test. Results: Two way ANOVA revealed significant differences for the factors of dentin adhesives and composite resins, and significant interaction effect (p < 0.001). All combinations with Xeno V (Dentsply De Trey) and Clearfil $S^3$ Bond (Kuraray Dental) adhesives showed no significant differences in micro-shear bond strength, but other adhesives showed significant differences depending on the composite resin (p < 0.05). Contrary to the other adhesives, Xeno V and BondForce (Tokuyama Dental) had higher bond strengths with the same manufacturer's composite resin than other manufacturer's composite resin. Conclusions: Not all combinations of adhesive and composite resin by same manufacturers failed to show significantly higher bond strengths than mixed manufacturer combinations.

Keywords

References

  1. Asmussen E, Uno S. Adhesion of restorative resins to dentin: chemical and physicochemical aspects. Oper Dent 1992;Suppl 5:68-74.
  2. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005;84:183-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400214
  3. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131 Suppl:20S-25S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0398
  4. Perdigao J. New concepts in dental adhesion. Northwest Dent 2000;79:29-33.
  5. Freedman G, Leinfelder K. Seventh-generation adhesive systems. Dent Today 2002;21:106-111.
  6. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604
  7. Van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Okazaki M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res 2008;87:757-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700804
  8. Perdigao J, Ramos JC, Lambrechts P. In vitro interfacial relationship between human dentin and one-bottle dental adhesives. Dent Mater 1997;13:218-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80032-2
  9. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding to Enamel and Dentin. In: James B. Summitt, J. William Robins, Thomas J. Hilton, Richard S. Schwartz, editors. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. 3rd ed. Hanover Park, IL: Quintessence Publishing co, Inc.; 2006. p193-260.
  10. Leirskar J, Oilo G, Nordbo H. In vitro shear bond strength of two resin composites to dentin with five different dentin adhesives. Quintessence Int 1998;29:787-792.
  11. Roh BD, Chung JH. Micro-shear bond strength of five resin-based composites to dentin with five different dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 2005;18:333-337.
  12. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 1995;11:117-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8
  13. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2000;16:180-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00007-5
  14. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604
  15. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 2005;24:1-13. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.24.1
  16. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:237-245.
  17. Perdigao J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:333-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2007.01.001
  18. Koshiro K, Sidhu SK, Inoue S, Ikeda T, Sano H. New concept of resin-dentin interfacial adhesion: the nanointeraction zone. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;77:401-408.
  19. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
  20. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204
  21. Poptani B, Gohil KS, Ganjiwale J, Shukla M. Microtensile dentin bond strength of fifth with five seventhgeneration dentin bonding agents after thermocycling: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3:S167-171. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.101079
  22. Hegde MN, Hegde P, Bhandary S, Deepika K. An evalution of compressive strength of newer nanocomposite: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2011;14:36-39. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.80734
  23. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Composite resins in the 21st century. Quintessence Int 1993;24:641-658.

Cited by

  1. Influence of EDC on Dentin-Resin Shear Bond Strength and Demineralized Dentin Thermal Properties vol.9, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9110920
  2. Dentin bond strengths of all-in-one adhesives combined with different manufacturers’ flowable resin composites vol.40, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-373
  3. Influence of etching mode and composite resin type on bond strength to dentin using universal adhesive system vol.84, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23680