DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of shear bond strength between dual cure resin cement and zirconia ceramic after thermocycling treatment

  • Lee, Jung-Jin (Department of Dental Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kang, Cheol-Kyun (Department of Dental Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Oh, Ju-Won (Department of Dental Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Seo, Jae-Min (Department of Dental Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Ju-Mi (Department of Dental Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2013.11.19
  • 심사 : 2014.12.23
  • 발행 : 2015.02.27

초록

PURPOSE. This study was performed to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) between three dual-cured resin cements and silica coated zirconia, before and after thermocycling treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixty specimens were cut in $15{\times}2.75mm$ discs using zirconia. After air blasting of $50{\mu}m$ alumina, samples were prepared by tribochemical silica coating with $Rocatec^{TM}$ plus. The specimens were divided into three groups according to the dual-cure resin cement used: (1) Calibra silane+$Calibra^{(R)}$, (2) Monobond S+$Multilink^{(R)}$ N and (3) ESPN sil+$RelyX^{TM}$ Unicem Clicker. After the resin cement was bonded to the zirconia using a Teflon mold, photopolymerization was carried out. Only 10 specimens in each group were thermocycled 6,000 times. Depending on thermocycling treatment, each group was divided into two subgroups (n=10) and SBS was measured by applying force at the speed of 1 mm/min using a universal testing machine. To find out the differences in SBS according to the types of cements and thermocycling using the SPSS, two-way ANOVA was conducted and post-hoc analysis was performed by Turkey's test. RESULTS. In non-thermal aged groups, SBS of Multilink group (M1) was higher than that of Calibra (C1) and Unicem (U1) group (P<.05). Moreover, even after thermocycling treatment, SBS of Multilink group (M2) was higher than the other groups (C2 and U2). All three cements showed lower SBS after the thermocycling than before the treatments. But Multilink and Unicem had a significant difference (P<.05). CONCLUSION. In this experiment, Multilink showed the highest SBS before and after thermocycling. Also, bond strengths of all three cements decreased after thermocycling.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Oden A, Andersson M, Krystek-Ondracek I, Magnusson D. Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:450-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70010-1
  2. Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998;14:64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00011-6
  3. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 1999;15:426-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00070-6
  4. Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:479-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(02)52704-9
  5. Luthardt RG, Holzhuter M, Sandkuhl O, Herold V, Schnapp JD, Kuhlisch E, Walter M. Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res 2002;81:487-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100711
  6. Luthardt R, Weber A, Rudolph H, Schone C, Quaas S, Walter M. Design and production of dental prosthetic restorations: basic research on dental CAD/CAM technology. Int J Comput Dent 2002;5:165-76.
  7. Brentel AS, Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Alarca LG, Amaral R, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldpathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent Mater 2007;23:1323-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.011
  8. Kramer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 2005;21:262-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.009
  9. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:725-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8
  10. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50
  11. Derand P, Derand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:131-5.
  12. Mirmohammadi H, Aboushelib MN, Salameh Z, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. Innovations in bonding to zirconia based ceramics: Part III. Phosphate monomer resin cements. Dent Mater 2010;26:786-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.04.003
  13. Parsa RZ, Goldstein GR, Barrack GM, LeGeros RZ. An in vitro comparison of tensile bond strengths of noble and base metal alloys to enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:175-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00411-6
  14. Kim CH, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lim JS. Effect of surface treatments of zirconia ceramic on the bond strength of resin cements. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:386-96.
  15. Tsuo Y, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effects of alumina-blasting and adhesive primers on bonding between resin luting agent and zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater J 2006;25:669-74. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.669
  16. Kulunk S, Kulunk T, Ural C, Kurt M, Baba S. Effect of air abrasion particles on the bond strength of adhesive resin cement to zirconia core. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;69:88-94. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2010.536907
  17. Phark JH, Duarte S Jr, Blatz M, Sadan A. An in vitro evaluation of the long-term resin bond to a new densely sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic surface. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60286-3
  18. Karakoca S, Yilmaz H. Influence of surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of Y-TZP ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;91:930-7.
  19. Wegner SM, Gerdes W, Kern M. Effect of different artificial aging conditions on ceramic-composite bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:267-72.
  20. Ozcan M. The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87: 469-72. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.124365
  21. Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconiareinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006;22:283-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.021
  22. Ozcan M, Nijhuis H, Valandro LF. Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging. Dent Mater J 2008;27:99-104. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.99
  23. Isidor F, Stokholm R, Ravnholt G. Tensile bond strength of resin luting cement to glass infiltrated porous aluminium oxide cores (In-Ceram). Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1995;3: 199-202.
  24. Soderholm KJ, Shang SW. Molecular orientation of silane at the surface of colloidal silica. J Dent Res 1993;72:1050-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720061001
  25. D'Amario M, Campidoglio M, Morresi AL, Luciani L, Marchetti E, Baldi M. Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength between dual-cured resin cements and zirconiumoxide ceramics. J Oral Sci 2010;52:425-30. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.425

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials vol.8, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.259
  2. Effect of a filled adhesive as the desensitizer on bond strength of “Self-Adhesive Cements To” differently severity of fluorosed dentin vol.81, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23039
  3. Polymerization Efficiency of a Dual-Cured Resin Cement through Zirconia with Three Different Cusp Inclinations vol.2018, pp.2314-4939, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8684245
  4. Effect of Resin Luting Systems and Alumina Particle Air Abrasion on Bond Strength to Zirconia vol.43, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2341/15-352-L
  5. The effect of five kinds of surface treatment agents on the bond strength to various ceramics with thermocycle aging vol.36, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-383
  6. Dental Resin-Zirconia Bonding Promotion Using High-Silica PVD Coating with High Ionization Sputtering Processing vol.9, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9030182
  7. Silicon‐based film on the yttria‐stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal: Surface and shear bond strength analysis vol.10, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12477
  8. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of repair composite to indirect restorative materials vol.33, pp.21, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1640173
  9. Investigating the shear bond strength of five resin-based luting agents to zirconia ceramics vol.62, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.18-0480
  10. Effect of femtosecond laser and silica coating on the bond strength of zirconia ceramic vol.119, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2020.1780552
  11. Change of phase transformation and bond strength of Y-TZP with various hydrofluoric acid etching vol.46, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e54