DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Surgical Results of Third or More Cardiac Valve Operation

  • Sohn, Suk Ho (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hwang, Ho Young (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Hwan (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Bong (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Hyuk (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2014.06.24
  • Accepted : 2014.11.05
  • Published : 2015.02.05

Abstract

Background: We evaluated operative outcomes after third or more cardiac operations for valvular heart disease, and analyzed whether pericardial coverage with artificial membrane is helpful for subsequent reoperation. Methods: From 2000 to 2012, 149 patients (male : female=70 : 79; mean age at operation, $57.0{\pm}11.3$ years) underwent their third to fifth operations for valvular heart disease. Early results were compared between patients who underwent their third operation (n=114) and those who underwent fourth or fifth operation (n=35). Outcomes were also compared between 71 patients who had their pericardium open during the previous operation and 27 patients who had artificial membrane coverage. Results: Intraoperative adverse events occurred in 22 patients (14.8%). Right atrium (n=6) and innominate vein (n=5) were most frequently injured. In-hospital mortality rate was 9.4%. Total cardiopulmonary bypass time ($225{\pm}77$ minutes vs. $287{\pm}134$ minutes, p=0.012) and the time required to prepare aortic cross clamp ($209{\pm}57$ minutes vs. $259{\pm}68$ minutes, p<0.001) increased as reoperations were repeated. However, intraoperative event rate (13.2% vs. 20.0%), in-hospital mortality (9.6% vs. 8.6%) and postoperative complications were not statistically different according to the number of previous operations. Pericardial closure using artificial membrane at previous operation was not beneficial in reducing intraoperative events (25.9% vs. 18.3%) and shortening operation time preparing aortic cross clamp ($248{\pm}64$ minutes vs. $225{\pm}59$ minutes) as compared to no-closure. Conclusion: Clinical outcomes of the third or more operations for valvular heart disease were acceptable in terms of intraoperative adverse events and in-hospital mortality rates. There were no differences in the incidence of intraoperative adverse events, early mortality and postoperative complications between third cardiac operation and fourth or more.

Keywords

References

  1. Ellman PI, Smith RL, Girotti ME, et al. Cardiac injury during resternotomy does not affect perioperative mortality. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:993-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.010
  2. Dobell AR, Jain AK. Catastrophic hemorrhage during redo sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1984;37:273-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)60728-X
  3. Morales DL, Zafar F, Arrington KA, et al. Repeat sternotomy in congenital heart surgery: no longer a risk factor. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:897-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.044
  4. Kirshbom PM, Myung RJ, Simsic JM, et al. One thousand repeat sternotomies for congenital cardiac surgery: risk factors for reentry injury. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:158-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.082
  5. Roselli EE, Pettersson GB, Blackstone EH, et al. Adverse events during reoperative cardiac surgery: frequency, characterization, and rescue. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135:316-23, 323.e1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.060
  6. Park CB, Suri RM, Burkhart HM, et al. Identifying patients at particular risk of injury during repeat sternotomy: analysis of 2555 cardiac reoperations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:1028-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.07.086
  7. O'Brien MF, Harrocks S, Clarke A, Garlick B, Barnett AG. How to do safe sternal reentry and the risk factors of redo cardiac surgery: a 21-year review with zero major cardiac injury. J Card Surg 2002;17:4-13.
  8. Merin O, Silberman S, Brauner R, et al. Femoro-femoral bypass for repeat open-heart surgery. Perfusion 1998;13:455-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765919801300609
  9. Luciani N, Anselmi A, De Geest R, Martinelli L, Perisano M, Possati G. Extracorporeal circulation by peripheral cannulation before redo sternotomy: indications and results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:572-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.02.071
  10. Morales D, Williams E, John R. Is resternotomy in cardiac surgery still a problem? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;11:277-86. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2009.232090
  11. Rao V, Komeda M, Weisel RD, Cohen G, Borger MA, David TE. Should the pericardium be closed routinely after heart operations? Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:484-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(98)01199-0
  12. Elahi M, Dhannapuneni R, Firmin R, Hickey M. Direct complications of repeat median sternotomy in adults. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2005;13:135-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/021849230501300208
  13. Cunningham JN Jr, Spencer FC, Zeff R, Williams CD, Cukingnan R, Mullin M. Influence of primary closure of the pericardium after open-heart surgery on the frequency of tamponade, postcardiotomy syndrome, and pulmonary complications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975;70:119-25.
  14. Kroeker CA, Shrive NG, Belenkie I, Tyberg JV. Pericardium modulates left and right ventricular stroke volumes to compensate for sudden changes in atrial volume. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003;284:H2247-54. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00613.2002
  15. Amato JJ, Cotroneo JV, Galdieri RJ, Alboliras E, Antillon J, Vogel RL. Experience with the polytetrafluoroethylene surgical membrane for pericardial closure in operations for congenital cardiac defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;97:929-34.
  16. Jacobs JP, Iyer RS, Weston JS, et al. Expanded PTFE membrane to prevent cardiac injury during resternotomy for congenital heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1778-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(96)00610-8
  17. Ozeren M, Han U, Mavioglu I, et al. Consequences of PTFE membrane used for prevention of re-entry injuries in rheumatic valve disease. Cardiovasc Surg 2002;10:489-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-2109(02)00061-3
  18. Bunton RW, Xabregas AA, Miller AP. Pericardial closure after cardiac operations: an animal study to assess currently available materials with particular reference to their suitability for use after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:99-107.