Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration (간호행정학회지)

Korean Academy of Nursing Administration (한국간호행정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Systematic Search for Guidelines to Prevent Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections-Part II: Using the Ovid MEDLINE

유치도뇨관 감염예방 가이드라인에 관한 체계적 문헌검색 사례-Part II: Ovid MEDLINE 이용

  • Park, Hyunyoung (Department of Nursing, Honam University) ;
  • Jang, Keum-Seong (College of Nursing, Chonnam National University.Chonnam Research Institute of Nursing Science) ;
  • Choi, Ja-Yun (College of Nursing, Chonnam National University.Chonnam Research Institute of Nursing Science) ;
  • Kim, Yun-Hee (Department of Nursing, Mokpo National University)
  • 박현영 (호남대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 장금성 (전남대학교 간호대학.간호과학연구소) ;
  • 최자윤 (전남대학교 간호대학.간호과학연구소) ;
  • 김윤희 (국립목포대학교 간호학과)
  • Received : 2014.11.03
  • Accepted : 2015.01.14
  • Published : 2015.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: To implement evidence-based nursing, it is important to know where and how to find the best available evidence. This study was conducted to identify the results of a search from Ovid MEDLINE and to compare the results from Ovid MEDLINE with those from PubMed MEDLINE. Methods: Four different approaches via Ovid MEDLINE were used to search for guidelines on preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Outcomes of this study were the number of records and relevant literature, and the sensitivity and precision of the search methods via Ovid MEDLINE. Results: The number of retrieved items ranged 23 to 6,005 and that of relevant studies, 5 to 8 of 8. Simple searches resulted in the highest sensitivity of 100.0%. When using MeSH terms and limits feature, the precision was highest (21.7%) among four approaches for literature searches. Simple searches in Ovid had higher sensitivity and lower precision than those in PubMed. Conclusion: Simple searches in Ovid may be inefficient for busy clinicians compared to PubMed. However, to ensure a comprehensive and systematic literature search, using Ovid MEDLINE in addition to PubMed is recommended.

Keywords

References

  1. Haig A, Dozier M. BEME guide No. 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education-Part 2: Constructing searches. Medical Teacher. 2003;25(5):463-484. http://dx.doi.or/10.1080/01421590310001608667
  2. Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Keel M, Cole PA, Kregor PJ. Evidence-based resources and search strategies for orthopedic surgeons. Injury. 2006;37(4):307-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.01.033
  3. Kim YH, Jang KS, Chung KH, Choi JY, Ryu SA, Park HY. An example of systematic searching for guidelines to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections-Part I: Using the PubMed Database. Journal of Korean Academy Nursing Administration. 2014;20(1):128-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2014.20.1.128
  4. Haynes RB, Wilczynski N, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ, Sinclair JC. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 1994;1(6):447-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002642
  5. Melnyk BM, Finout-Overholt E, editors. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
  6. Linsey WT, Olin BR. PubMed searches: Overview and strategies for clinicians. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2013;28(2): 165-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0884533613475821
  7. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, Chambliss ML, Vinson DC, Stevermer JJ, et al. Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: Qualitative study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 2002;324(7339):710. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7339.710
  8. Berg A, Fleischer S, Behrens J. Development of two search strategies for literature in MEDLINE-PubMed: Nursing diagnoses in the context of evidence-based nursing. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2005; 16(2):26-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-618X.2005.00006.x
  9. Diog GS, Simpson F. Efficient literature searching: A core skill for the practice of evidence-based medicine. Intensive Care Medicine. 2003;29(12):2119-2127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1942-5
  10. Hopewell S, Clarke MJ, Lefebvre C, Scherer RW. Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;18 (2):MR000001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000001.pub2
  11. Shariff SZ, Bejaimal SA, Sontrop JM, Iansavichus AV, Weir MA, Haynes RB, et al. Searching for medical information online: A survey of Canadian nephrologists. Journal of Nephrology. 2011;24(6):723-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/JN.2011.6373
  12. De Groote SL. PubMed, Internet Grateful Med, and Ovid: A comparison of three MEDLINE Internet interfaces. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 2000;19(4):1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J115v19n04_01
  13. Neyt M, Chalon PX. Search MEDLINE for economic evaluations: Tips to translate an OVID strategy into a PubMed one. PharmacoEconomics. 2013;31(12):1087-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-013-0103-0
  14. Hildebrand AM, Iansavuchus AV, Lee CWC, Haynes RB, Wilczynski NL, Mckibbon KA, et al. Glomerular disease search filters for PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase: A development and validation study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2012;12:49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-49
  15. Hildebrand AM, Iansavuchus AV, Haynes RB, Wilczynski NL, Mehta RL, Parikh CR, et al. High-performance information search filters for acute kidney injury content in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE and Embase. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2014;29(4):823-832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft531
  16. Katchamart W, Faulkner A, Feldman B, Tomlinson G, Bombardier C. PubMed had a higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE in the search for systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011;64(7):805-807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.06.004
  17. Coneway LJ, Larson EL. Guidelines to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: 1980 to 2010. Heart & Lung. 2012;41(3):271-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2011.08.001
  18. Wong ES. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. American Journal of Infection Control. 1983;11(1):28-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-6553(83)80012-1
  19. Pratt RJ, Pellowe C, Loveday HP, Robinson N, Smith GW, Barrett S, et al. The EPIC Project: Developing national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare associated infections. Phase I: Guidelines for preventing hospital-acquired infections. Department of Health(England). The Journal of Hospital Infection. 2001;47(Suppl):S3-S82.. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2000.0886
  20. Pratt RJ, Pellowe CM, Wilson JA, Loveday HP, Harper PJ, Jones SRLJ, et al. EPIC 2: National evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2007;65(Suppl 1):S1-S64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(07)60002-4
  21. Tenke P, Kovacs B, Bjerklund Johansen TE, Matsumoto T, Tambyah PA, Naber KG. European and Asian guidelines on management and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2008;31(Suppl 1):S68-S78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.07.033
  22. Lo E, Nicolle L, Classen D, Arias KM, Podgorny K, Anderson DJ, et al. Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2008;29(Suppl 1):S41-S50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/591066
  23. Parker D, Callan L, Harwood J, Thompson D, Webb M-L, Wilde M, et al. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: Fact sheet. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing. 2009;36(2):156-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WON.0000347656.94969.99
  24. Willson M, Wilde M, Webb M-L, Thompson D, Parker D, Harwood J, et al. Nursing interventions to reduce the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection: Part 2: Staff education, monitoring, and care techniques. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing. 2009;36(2):137-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WON.0000347655.56851.04
  25. Parker D, Callan L, Harwood J, Thompson DL, Wilde M, Gray M. Nursing interventions to reduce the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Part 1: Catheter selection. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing. 2009; 36(1): 23-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.WON.0000345173.05376.3e
  26. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, Colgan R, Geerlings SE, Rice JC, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2010;50(5):625-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/650482
  27. Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK, Kuntz G, Pegues DA. Healthcare infection control practices advisory committee. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2010;31(4):319-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/651091
  28. Kim SY, Park JE, Seo HJ, Lee YJ, Jang BH, Son HJ, et al. NECA's guidance for understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention. Seoul: National Evidencebased Healthcare Collaborating Agency; 2011. p. 19-46.
  29. University of Texas School of Public Health. Search filters for various databases [Internet]. Texas: The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. 2010 [cited 2013 November 16]. Available from: http://libguides.sph.uth.tmc.edu/ovid_medline_filters
  30. Zhang L, Ajiferuke I, Sampson M. Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2006;6:23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-23

Cited by

  1. A Systematic Review of Home based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD Patients: Randomized Controlled Trials vol.19, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7587/kjrehn.2016.82