DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Dual-Color Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization With Peptide Nucleic Acid Probes for the Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria in Clinical Specimens

  • Kim, Namhee (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Seung Hee (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Cheukchu Hospital) ;
  • Yi, Jongyoun (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Chang, Chulhun L. (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital)
  • Received : 2015.02.03
  • Accepted : 2015.06.23
  • Published : 2015.09.01

Abstract

Background: Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes are artificial DNA analogues with a hydrophobic nature that can penetrate the mycobacterial cell wall. We evaluated a FISH method for simultaneous detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in clinical respiratory specimens using differentially labeled PNA probes. Methods: PNA probes targeting the mycobacterial 16S ribosomal RNA were synthesized. The cross-reactivity of MTB- and NTM-specific probes was examined with reference strains and 10 other frequently isolated bacterial species. A total of 140 sputum specimens were analyzed, comprising 100 MTB-positive specimens, 21 NTM-positive specimens, and 19 MTB/NTM-negative specimens; all of them were previously confirmed by PCR and culture. The PNA FISH test results were graded by using the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended scale and compared with the results from the fluorochrome acid-fast bacterial stain. Results: The MTB- and NTM-specific PNA probes showed no cross-reactivity with other tested bacterial species. The test results demonstrated 82.9% agreement with the culture results with diagnostic sensitivity of 80.2% and diagnostic specificity of 100.0% (kappa=0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.370-0.676). Conclusions: Dual-color PNA FISH showed high specificity for detecting and identifying mycobacteria in clinical specimens. However, because of its relatively low sensitivity, this method could be more applicable to culture confirmation. In application to direct specimens, the possibility of false-negative results needs to be considered.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2014.
  2. Shinnick TM, Iademarco MF, Ridderhof JC. National plan for reliable tuberculosis laboratory services using a systems approach. Recommendations from CDC and the Association of Public Health Laboratories Task Force on Tuberculosis Laboratory Services. MMWR Recomm Rep 2005;54:1-12.
  3. Fitzgerald DW, Sterling TR, Hass DW. Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolan R, eds. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2010.
  4. Padilla E, Manterola JM, Rasmussen OF, Lonca J, Dominguez J, Matas L, et al. Evaluation of a fluorescence hybridisation assay using peptide nucleic acid probes for identification and differentiation of tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria in liquid cultures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2000;19:140-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100960050447
  5. Perry-O'Keefe H, Rigby S, Oliveira K, Sorensen D, Stender H, Coull J, et al. Identification of indicator microorganisms using a standardized PNA FISH method. J Microbiol Methods 2001;47:281-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00303-7
  6. Stender H, Lund K, Petersen KH, Rasmussen OF, Hongmanee P, Miorner H, et al. Fluorescence In situ hybridization assay using peptide nucleic acid probes for differentiation between tuberculous and nontuberculous mycobacterium species in smears of mycobacterium cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:2760-5.
  7. Porcheddu A and Giacomelli G. Peptide nucleic acids (PNAs), a chemical overview. Curr Med Chem 2005;12:2561-99. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986705774370664
  8. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990;215:403-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
  9. Diagnostic Standards and Classification of Tuberculosis in Adults and Children. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. This statement was endorsed by the Council of the Infectious Disease Society of America, September 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:1376-95. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.161.4.16141
  10. Steingart KR, Henry M, Ng V, Hopewell PC, Ramsay A, Cunningham J, et al. Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2006;6:570-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70578-3
  11. Koh WJ, Kwon OJ, Jeon K, Kim TS, Lee KS, Park YK, et al. Clinical significance of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from respiratory specimens in Korea. Chest 2006;129:341-8. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.2.341

Cited by

  1. Dual color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium complexes and related pathogens in cultures vol.12, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174989
  2. Rapid method for detecting and differentiating Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and non-tuberculous mycobacteria in sputum by fluorescence in situ hybridization with DNA probes vol.75, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2018.07.011
  3. Potential applications of peptide nucleic acid in biomedical domain vol.2, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12238
  4. Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria: Molecular and Physiological Bases of Virulence and Adaptation to Ecological Niches vol.8, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091380