DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pancreas: Comparison with Conventional Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging

  • Kim, Hyungjin (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Min (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Yoon, Jeong Hee (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Jang, Jin-Young (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Whe (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Ryu, Ji Kon (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kannengiesser, Stephan (Siemens Healthcare) ;
  • Han, Joon Koo (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Byung Ihn (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • Received : 2014.11.08
  • Accepted : 2015.07.21
  • Published : 2015.11.01

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the image quality (IQ) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of reduced field-of-view (FOV) di-ffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of pancreas in comparison with full FOV DWI. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 2 readers independently performed qualitative analysis of full FOV DWI (FOV, $38{\times}38cm$; b-value, 0 and $500m^2/sec$) and reduced FOV DWI (FOV, $28{\times}8.5cm$; b-value, 0 and $400mm^2/sec$2). Both procedures were conducted with a two-dimensional spatially selective radiofrequency excitation pulse, in 102 patients with benign or malignant pancreatic diseases (mean size, $27.5{\pm}14.4mm$). The study parameters included 1) anatomic structure visualization, 2) lesion conspicuity, 3) artifacts, 4) IQ score, and 5) subjective clinical utility for confirming or excluding initially considered differential diagnosis on conventional imaging. Another reader performed quantitative ADC measurements of focal pancreatic lesions and parenchyma. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare qualitative scores and ADCs between DWI sequences. Mann Whitney U-test was used to compare ADCs between the lesions and parenchyma. Results: On qualitative analysis, reduced FOV DWI showed better anatomic structure visualization ($2.76{\pm}0.79$ at $b=0s/mm^2$ and $2.81{\pm}0.64$ at $b=400s/mm^2$), lesion conspicuity ($3.11{\pm}0.99$ at $b=0s/mm^2$ and $3.15{\pm}0.79$ at $b=400s/mm^2$), IQ score ($8.51{\pm}2.05$ at $b=0s/mm^2$ and $8.79{\pm}1.60$ at $b=400s/mm^2$), and higher clinical utility ($3.41{\pm}0.64$), as compared to full FOV DWI (anatomic structure, $2.18{\pm}0.59$ at $b=0s/mm^2$ and $2.56{\pm}0.47$ at $b=500s/mm^2$; lesion conspicuity, $2.55{\pm}1.07$ at $b=0s/mm^2$ and $2.89{\pm}0.86$ at $b=500s/mm^2$; IQ score, $7.13{\pm}1.83$ at $b=0s/mm^2$ and $8.17{\pm}1.31$ at $b=500s/mm^2$; clinical utility, $3.14{\pm}0.70$) (p < 0.05). Artifacts were significantly improved on reduced FOV DWI ($2.65{\pm}0.68$) at $b=0s/mm^2$ (full FOV DWI, $2.41{\pm}0.63$) (p < 0.001). On quantitative analysis, there were no significant differences between the 2 DWI sequences in ADCs of various pancreatic lesions and parenchyma (p > 0.05). ADCs of adenocarcinomas ($1.061{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s{\pm}0.133$ at reduced FOV and $1.079{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s{\pm}0.135$ at full FOV) and neuroendocrine tumors ($0.983{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s{\pm}0.152$ at reduced FOV and $1.004{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s{\pm}0.153$ at full FOV) were significantly lower than those of parenchyma ($1.191{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s{\pm}0.125$ at reduced FOV and $1.218{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s{\pm}0.103$ at full FOV) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Reduced FOV DWI of the pancreas provides better overall IQ including better anatomic detail, lesion conspicuity and subjective clinical utility.

Keywords

References

  1. Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1622-1635 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1403
  2. Balci NC, Perman WH, Saglam S, Akisik F, Fattahi R, Bilgin M. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2009;20:43-47 https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0b013e3181b48667
  3. Fattahi R, Balci NC, Perman WH, Hsueh EC, Alkaade S, Havlioglu N, et al. Pancreatic diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): comparison between mass-forming focal pancreatitis (FP), pancreatic cancer (PC), and normal pancreas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:350-356 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21651
  4. Kartalis N, Lindholm TL, Aspelin P, Permert J, Albiin N. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreas tumours. Eur Radiol 2009;19:1981-1990 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1384-8
  5. Lee SS, Byun JH, Park BJ, Park SH, Kim N, Park B, et al. Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas: usefulness in characterizing solid pancreatic masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:928-936 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21508
  6. Matsuki M, Inada Y, Nakai G, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M, Narabayashi I, et al. Diffusion-weighed MR imaging of pancreatic carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 2007;32:481-483 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9192-6
  7. Sandrasegaran K, Nutakki K, Tahir B, Dhanabal A, Tann M, Cote GA. Use of diffusion-weighted MRI to differentiate chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:1002-1008 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.10170
  8. Wiggermann P, Grutzmann R, Weissenbock A, Kamusella P, Dittert DD, Stroszczynski C. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of the pancreas, pancreas carcinoma, and mass-forming focal pancreatitis. Acta Radiol 2012;53:135-139 https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2011.100252
  9. Anaye A, Mathieu A, Closset J, Bali MA, Metens T, Matos C. Successful preoperative localization of a small pancreatic insulinoma by diffusion-weighted MRI. JOP 2009;10:528-531
  10. Shinya S, Sasaki T, Nakagawa Y, Guiquing Z, Yamamoto F, Yamashita Y. The efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the detection and evaluation of acute pancreatitis. Hepatogastroenterology 2009;56:1407-1410
  11. Bittencourt LK, Matos C, Coutinho AC Jr. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the upper abdomen: technical issues and clinical applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2011;19:111-131 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2010.09.002
  12. Dietrich O, Biffar A, Baur-Melnyk A, Reiser MF. Technical aspects of MR diffusion imaging of the body. Eur J Radiol 2010;76:314-322 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.02.018
  13. Saritas EU, Cunningham CH, Lee JH, Han ET, Nishimura DG. DWI of the spinal cord with reduced FOV single-shot EPI. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:468-473 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21640
  14. Zaharchuk G, Saritas EU, Andre JB, Chin CT, Rosenberg J, Brosnan TJ, et al. Reduced field-of-view diffusion imaging of the human spinal cord: comparison with conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:813-820 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2418
  15. Ma C, Li YJ, Pan CS, Wang H, Wang J, Chen SY, et al. High resolution diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas using reduced field of view single-shot echoplanar imaging at 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging 2014;32:125-131 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2013.10.005
  16. Riffel P, Michaely HJ, Morelli JN, Pfeuffer J, Attenberger UI, Schoenberg SO, et al. Zoomed EPI-DWI of the pancreas using two-dimensional spatially-selective radiofrequency excitation pulses. PLoS One 2014;9:e89468 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089468
  17. Yoo RE, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Kim JH, Han JK, Choi BI. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant distal biliary strictures: value of adding diffusion-weighted imaging to conventional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:1509-1517 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24304
  18. Koh DM, Collins DJ, Orton MR. Intravoxel incoherent motion in body diffusion-weighted MRI: reality and challenges. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1351-1361 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5515
  19. Lemke A, Laun FB, Klauss M, Re TJ, Simon D, Delorme S, et al. Differentiation of pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters. Invest Radiol 2009;44:769-775 https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b62271
  20. Alley MT, Pauly JM, Sommer FG, Pelc NJ. Angiographic imaging with 2D RF pulses. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:260-267 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910370220
  21. Kartalis N, Loizou L, Edsborg N, Segersvärd R, Albiin N. Optimising diffusion-weighted MR imaging for demonstrating pancreatic cancer: a comparison of respiratory-triggered, free-breathing and breath-hold techniques. Eur Radiol 2012;22:2186-2192 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2469-3
  22. Inan N, Arslan A, Akansel G, Anik Y, Demirci A. Diffusionweighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1115-1121 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3754
  23. Andre JB, Zaharchuk G, Saritas E, Komakula S, Shankaranarayan A, Banerjee S, et al. Clinical evaluation of reduced field-ofview diffusion-weighted imaging of the cervical and thoracic spine and spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1860-1866 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3134
  24. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 1977;33:363-374 https://doi.org/10.2307/2529786
  25. Reischauer C, Wilm BJ, Froehlich JM, Gutzeit A, Prikler L, Gablinger R, et al. High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging of prostate cancer using a reduced FOV technique. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:e34-e41 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.038
  26. Singer L, Wilmes LJ, Saritas EU, Shankaranarayanan A, Proctor E, Wisner DJ, et al. High-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Acad Radiol 2012;19:526-534 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2011.11.003
  27. Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Parker GJ, Symms MR, Hickman SJ, Tofts PS, Miller DH, et al. ADC mapping of the human optic nerve: increased resolution, coverage, and reliability with CSF-suppressed ZOOM-EPI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:24-31 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10016
  28. Wilm BJ, Svensson J, Henning A, Pruessmann KP, Boesiger P, Kollias SS. Reduced field-of-view MRI using outer volume suppression for spinal cord diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;57:625-630 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21167
  29. Chandarana H, Babb J, Macari M. Signal characteristic and enhancement patterns of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: evaluation with dynamic gadolinium enhanced MRI. Clin Radiol 2007;62:876-883 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2007.03.005
  30. Kim JH, Park SH, Yu ES, Kim MH, Kim J, Byun JH, et al. Visually isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma at dynamic-enhanced CT: frequency, clinical and pathologic characteristics, and diagnosis at imaging examinations. Radiology 2010;257:87-96 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100015
  31. Rieseberg S, Frahm J, Finsterbusch J. Two-dimensional spatially-selective RF excitation pulses in echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1186-1193 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10157
  32. Wang Y, Chen ZE, Yaghmai V, Nikolaidis P, McCarthy RJ, Merrick L, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in pancreatic endocrine tumors correlated with histopathologic characteristics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:1071-1079 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22541
  33. Dowell NG, Jenkins TM, Ciccarelli O, Miller DH, Wheeler- Kingshott CA. Contiguous-slice zonally oblique multislice (COZOOM) diffusion tensor imaging: examples of in vivo spinal cord and optic nerve applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:454-460 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21656
  34. Jeong EK, Kim SE, Guo J, Kholmovski EG, Parker DL. Highresolution DTI with 2D interleaved multislice reduced FOV single-shot diffusion-weighted EPI (2D ss-rFOV-DWEPI). Magn Reson Med 2005;54:1575-1579 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20711

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Multidetector CT and Gadobutrol-Enhanced MR Imaging for Evaluation of Small, Solid Pancreatic Lesions vol.17, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.509
  2. Differentiation grade for extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma: Assessed by diffusion-weighted imaging at 3.0-T MR vol.85, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.004
  3. Diffusion-Weighted MRI for the Initial Viability Evaluation of Parasites in Hepatic Alveolar Echinococcosis: Comparison with Positron Emission Tomography vol.19, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.1.40
  4. Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T s vol.47, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25814
  5. Diffusion-Weighted Zonal Oblique Multislice–EPI Enhances the Detection of Small Lesions with Diffusion Restriction in the Brain Stem and Hippocampus: A Clinical Report of Selected Cases vol.39, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a5635
  6. Reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with gastric cancer : Comparison with conventional DWI techniques at 3.0T: A preliminary study vol.99, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000018616
  7. Qualitative and quantitative comparison of image quality between single-shot echo-planar and interleaved multi-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in female pelvis vol.30, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06491-3
  8. Clinical Feasibility of Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Computed Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Technique in Breast Cancer Patients vol.10, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10080538
  9. Prospective Comparison of Reduced Field-of-View (rFOV) and Full FOV (fFOV) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) in the Assessment of Insulinoma: Image Quality and Lesion Detection vol.27, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.019
  10. Prospective Comparison of Reduced Field-of-View (rFOV) and Full FOV (fFOV) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) in the Assessment of Insulinoma: Image Quality and Lesion Detection vol.27, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.019
  11. Modified Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: Comparison With Reduced Field-of-View Imaging and Single Shot Echo-Planar Imaging vol.45, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000001156
  12. Single shot zonal oblique multislice SE-EPI diffusion-weighted imaging with low to ultra-high b-values for the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral spinal fractures vol.8, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100377
  13. Multi‐task convolutional neural network‐based design of radio frequency pulse and the accompanying gradients for magnetic resonance imaging vol.34, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4443
  14. Reduced field-of-view versus full field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging for the evaluation of complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer vol.46, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02763-5
  15. Reduced Field‐of‐View Diffusion‐Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pancreas With Tilted Excitation Plane: A Preliminary Study vol.54, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27590
  16. Synthesizing High-b-Value Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Prostate Using Generative Adversarial Networks vol.3, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.2021200237
  17. Better lesion conspicuity translates into improved prostate cancer detection: comparison of non-parallel-transmission-zoomed-DWI with conventional-DWI vol.46, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03268-5
  18. Noise reduction in diffusion weighted MRI of the pancreas using an L1-regularized iterative SENSE reconstruction vol.87, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2021.11.009