DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Short Term Runoff Characteristics Change of Stream Water Quality with Different Rainfall Events in Planted Coniferous Forest

침엽수 인공림에서 강우사상별 계류수 수질의 유출특성 변화

  • Kim, Jaehoon (Dept. of Forest Restoration, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Choi, Hyung Tae (Dept. of Forest Restoration, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Yoo, Jae Yun (Dept. of Aquatic Ecosystem facilities, Korea Environment Corporation)
  • 김재훈 (국립산림과학원 산림복원연구과) ;
  • 최형태 (국립산림과학원 산림복원연구과) ;
  • 유재윤 (한국환경공단 수생태시설처)
  • Received : 2015.10.20
  • Accepted : 2015.12.01
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate solutes concentration change with respect to discharge change in coniferous forest experiment watershed in Gyeonggi-do, Korea. From 2005 to 2008. Precipitation, discharge, solutes has been analyzed from 23 precipitation events. The results showed that low API induced low discharge. $NH_4{^+}$, $K^+$, and $Ca^{2+}$ were indicated by clockwise and $Cl^-$ and $NO_3{^-}$ were represented by counterclockwise hysteresis loop. ${SO_4}^{2-}$, $Na^+$, $Mg^{2+}$ showed no hysteresis loop pattern. $Cl^-$, $Na^+$, $NH_4{^+}$ was relatively constant due to groundwater during precipitation, $NO_3{^-}$ was increased due to soil water compared to early precipitation. $Cl^-$, ${SO_4}^{2-}$, $Na^+$, $Mg^{2+}$, $Ca^{2+}$ was diluted with respect to increased discharge and $NO_3{^-}$ was diluted in early precipitation and then increased in the end. $NO_3{^-}$ and $Ca^{2+}$ eluviated in early precipitation. This characteristics was presumed by the effect of API, discharge and ground water.

본 연구는 침엽수 인공림에서 강우와 유출에 따른 계류수 용존이온의 특성 밝혀보고자, 경기도 국립수목원 소재의 침엽수 시험림에서 강우, 유량, 용존이온을 조사하였다. 2005년 6월부터 2008년 9월까지 총 23개의 강수사상별 수질시료를 채수하여 분석한 결과 API 값이 낮을수록 유출량이 적었다. 유량변화에 따른 용존이온 특성으로는, $NH_4{^+}$, $K^+$, $Ca^{2+}$ 이온은 시계 방향, $Cl^-$, $NO_3{^-}$ 이온은 반시계 방향의 이력곡선을 나타냈으며, ${SO_4}^{2-}$, $Na^+$, $Mg^{2+}$ 이온은 이력현상을 보이지 않았다. $Cl^-$, $Na^+$, $NH_4{^+}$는 지하수의 영향으로 강수 이전 수준으로 농도가 유지되는 것으로, $NO_3{^-}$는 토양수의 영향으로 강수 이전 보다 높은 농도는 나타내는 것으로 판단된다. $Cl^-$, ${SO_4}^{2-}$, $Na^+$, $Mg^{2+}$, $Ca^{2+}$ 이온은 유출량 증가에 따라 강한 희석반응을 보였고, $NO_3{^-}$ 이온은 유출초기 희석 후 농도가 증가하였다. $NO_3{^-}$, $Ca^{2+}$ 이온은 강수 초기에 세탈효과를 나타냈다. 유출량 변화에 따른 이러한 농도변화 특성은 선행강수, 유출량, 지하수 등의 영향으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Biron, P.M., Roy, A.G., Courschesne, F., Hendershot, W.H., Cote, B. and J. Fyles(1999) The effects of antecedent moisture conditions on the relationship of hydrology to hydrochemistry in a small forested watershed. Hydrological Processes 13: 1541-1555. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19990815)13:11<1541::AID-HYP832>3.0.CO;2-J
  2. Caissie D., Pollock, T.L. and R.A. Cunjak(1996) Variation in stream water chemistry and hydrograph separation in a small drainage basin. Journal of Hydrology 178: 137-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02806-4
  3. Evans, C. and T.D. Davies(1998) Causes of concentration/discharge hysteresis and its potential as a tool for analysis of episode hydrochemistry. Water Resources Research 34(1): 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR01881
  4. Drewry, J.J., Newham, L.T.H. and B.F.W. Croke(2009) Suspended sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations and exports during storm-events to the Tuross estuary, Australia. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 879-887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.004
  5. Grimaldi, C., Grimaldi, M., Millet, A., Bariac, T. and J. Boul'egue(2004) Behaviour of chemical solutes during a storm in a rainforested headwater catchment. Hydrological Processes 18: 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1314
  6. Holloway, J.M. and R.A. Dahlgren(2001) Seasonal and event-scale variations in solute chemistry for four Sierra Nevada catchments. Journal of Hydrology 250: 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00424-3
  7. Hood, E.W., Williams, M.W. and N. Caine(2002) Yields of dissolved organic C, N, and P from three high-elevation catchments, Colorado front range, U.S.A. Water, Air and Soil Pollution: Focus 2: 165-180.
  8. Inamdar, S., Rupp, J. and M. Mitchell(2008) Differences in dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen responses to storm-event and ground-water conditions in forested, glaciated watershed in western New York. Journal of the American Water Resources Association: 44(6): 1458-1473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00251.x
  9. Johnson, N.M., Likens, G.E., Bormann, F.H., Fisher, D.W. and R.S. Pierce(1969) A working model for the variation in stream water chemistry at the Hubbard Brook experimental forest, New Hampshire. Water Resources Research 5: 1353-1363. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR005i006p01353
  10. Jun, J., Kim, K., Yoo, J., Choi, H.T. and Y. Jeong(2007) Variation of suspended soild concentration, electrical conductivity and pH of stream water in the regrowth and rehabilitation forested catchments, South Korea. Journal of Korean Forest Society 96(1): 21-28. (in Korean with English abstract)
  11. Kendall, K.A., Shanley, J.B. and J.J. McDonnell(1999) A hydrometric and geochemical approach to test the transmissivity feedback hypothesis during snowmelt. Journal of Hydrology 219: 188-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00059-1
  12. Ladouche B., Probst, A., Viville, D., Idir, S., Bauqe, D., Loubet, M., Probst, J.L. and T. Bariac(2001) Hydrograph separation using isotopic, chemical and hydrological approaches (Strengbach catchment, France). Journal of Hydrology 242: 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00391-7
  13. Mitchell, M.J., Piatek, K.B., Christopher, S., Mayer, B., Kendall, C. and P. McHale(2006) Solute sources in stream water during consecutive fall storms in a northern hardwood forest watershed: a combined hydrological, chemical and isotopic approach. Biogeochemistry 78: 217-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-005-4277-1
  14. Muraoka, K. and T. Hirata(1988) Streamwater chemistry during rainfall events in a forested basin. Journal of Hydrology 102: 235-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(88)90100-X
  15. Ohrui, K. and M.J. Mitchell(1998) Streamwater chemistry in Japanese forested watersheds and its variability on a small regional scale. Water Resources Research 34(6): 1553-1561. https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR00918
  16. Sklash, M.G. and R.N. Farvolden(1979) The role of groundwater in storm runoff. Journal of Hydrology 43: 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(79)90164-1
  17. Tsujimura, M., Onda, Y. and J. Ito(2001) Stream water chemistry in a steep headwater basin with high relief. Hydrological Processes 15: 1847-1858. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.243
  18. Viessman, W. Jr., Knapp, J.W., Lewis, G.L. and T.E. Harbaugh (1977) Introduction to hydrology. Harper & Row Publisher Inc., New York, 704pp.
  19. Williams, M.R. and J.M. Melack(1997) Atmospheric deposition, mass balances, and processes regulation streamwater solute concentrations in mixed-conifer catchments of the Sierra Nevada, California. Biogeochemistry 37: 111-144. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005705927291
  20. Yoon, Y.N.(2003) Engineering Hydrology. Cheongmungak, Seoul, 660pp. (in Korean)
  21. Yoon, H.J., Kim, H.J. and I.H. Yoon(2006) On the study of the seasonality precipitation over South Korea. Journal of Earth Science Society 27(2): 149-158. (in Korean with English abstract)