DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Technicians Working at Hospitals Towards Testicular Cancer and Self-examination of Testicles in Turkey

  • Ozturk, Ahmet (Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University) ;
  • Unalan, Demet (Erciyes University Halil Bayraktar Health Services Vocational College) ;
  • Guleser, Gulsum Nihal (Department of Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Erciyes University)
  • Published : 2015.01.06

Abstract

Background: The present study was conducted to determine knowledge level of technicians working in hospitals about testicular cancer (TC) and self-examination of testicles (TSE) and to determine levels of consciousness and implementation status about TSE. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with technicians working in hospitals (n=243) between $2^{nd}$ January-$31^{st}$ May 2012 at private and governmental hospitals in urban Kayseri. Healthy control subjects (n=235) who were similar to technicians in terms of age, education level and income status were also included to the study. Chi-square test was used in comparison of categorical variables. Results: Technicians were significantly more aware of TC than controls, but the latter were found to have significantly more information about TSE. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of knowing how to do TSE and 80% of both groups were unaware this exam. Of technicians, 19.8% and of controls, 25.5% did TSE, the difference being statistically insignificant. First reason for not doing TSE was "not-knowing" among technicians (48.1%) while it was "ignorance" among controls (66.8%). Of technicians doing TSE, 37.5% did as it came to their mind while 51.7% of controls performed TSE several times in the previous year. Technicians were significantly more afraid of getting TC than controls (p=0.037). Conclusions: It was determined in the present study that rates of TSE were similar between technicians and controls. However compliance with the recommended frequency and right method was low. Consequently, public health education should be planned and applied in order to increase the knowledge of TC and TSE.

Keywords

References

  1. Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F, et al (2011). European association of urology. EAU guidelines on testicular cancer: 2011 update. Eur Urol, 60, 304-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.038
  2. Altinel B, Aydin Avci I (2013). The knowledge, beliefs and practises of university students on testicular cancer and testiculer self-examination. TAF Prev Med Bull, 12, 365-70.
  3. Asgar Pour H, Cam R (2014). Evaluation of men's knowledge, attitude and behavior about testicular self-examination and testicular cancer. Florence Nightingale J Nur, 22, 33-8. https://doi.org/10.17672/fnhd.59508
  4. Brewer G, Roy M, Watters J (2011). Testicular self-examination in an adult community sample. Am J Mens Health, 5, 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988310361520
  5. Cancer Research UK (2014). Testicular cancer Key Facts.
  6. Gultekin M, Boztas G (2014). Turkey cancer statistics, TR Ministry of Health.
  7. Gocgeldi E, Kocak N, Ulus S, et al (2011). Investigation of the frequency of testicular self examination performance in young adult males. Gulhane Med J, 53,17-25
  8. Khadra A, Oakeshott P (2002). Pilot study of testicular cancer awarenes sand testicular self-examination in men attending two South London general practices. Fam Pract, 19, 294-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/19.3.294
  9. Kuzgunbay B, Yaycioglu O, Soyupak B, et al (2013). Public awareness of testicular cancerand self-examination in Turkey: a multi center study of Turkish urooncology society. Urologic Oncol, 31, 386-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.01.020
  10. Moore RA, Topping A (1999). Youngmen's knowledge of testicular cancer and testicular self-examination: a lost opportunity? Eur J Cancer Care, 8, 137-42.
  11. Muliira JK, Nalwanga PB, Muliira RS, et al (2012). Knowledge, perceived risk and barriers to testicular self-examination among male university students in Uganda. J Men's Health, 9, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jomh.2011.11.004
  12. Ozbas A, Cavdar I, Findik UY, et al (2011). Inadequate knowledge levels of Turkish male university students about testicular self-examination. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 919-22.
  13. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al (2005). Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin, 55, 74-108. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74
  14. Rudberg L, Nisson S, Wikblad K, et al (2005). Testicular cancer and testicular self-examination: knowledge and attitudes of adolescent Swedish men. Cancer Nurs, 28, 256-62.
  15. Shallwani K, Ramji R, Ali TS, Khuwaja AK (2010). Self examination for breast and testicular cancers: a communitybased intervention study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 11, 383-6.
  16. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al (2014). Cancer statistics, 2014. Ca Cancer J Clin, 64, 9-29. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21208
  17. Ugurlu Z, Akkuzu G, Karahan A, et al (2011). Testicular cancer awareness and testicular self-examination among university students. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 695-8.
  18. Verhoeven R (2012). Epidemiology of uncommon male genital cancers, Studies with regional, national and international cancer registry data. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  19. Yetisyigit T, Babacan N, Urun Y, et al (2014). Predictors of outcome in patients with advanced non-seminomatous germ cell testicular tumors. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 831-5. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.2.831
  20. Yilmaz E, Koca Kutlu A, Cecen D (2009). The knowledge and behaviors school of health students related testicular cancer and testicular self examination. J Firat Health Services, 4, 72-85.
  21. Zhao JY, Ma XL, Li YY, et al (2014). Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET in patients with testicular cancer: a metaanalysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 3525-31. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.8.3525
  22. Znaor A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A, et al (2014). International variations and trends in testicular cancer incidence and mortality. Eur Urol, 65, 1095-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.004