DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Usefulness of Simple Rod Rotation to Correct Curve of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

  • Kim, Ji Yong (Department of Neurosurgery, Inha University Hospital) ;
  • Song, Kyungchul (Department of Anesthesiology, Inha University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Kyung Hyun (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Spine Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Rim, Dae Cheol (Department of Neurosurgery, Anyang TeunTeun Hospital) ;
  • Yoon, Seung Hwan (Department of Neurosurgery, Inha University Hospital)
  • Received : 2015.06.21
  • Accepted : 2015.09.23
  • Published : 2015.12.28

Abstract

Objective : To correct apical vertebral rotation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), direct vertebral derotation (DVD) or simple rod rotation (SRR) might be considered. The aim of the present study is to introduce the surgical experiences of AIS by a Korean neurosurgeon and to evaluate the effectiveness of SRR for apical vertebral rotation. Methods : A total of 9 patients (1 male and 8 females) underwent scoliosis surgery by a neurosurgeon of our hospital. The Lenke classifications of the patients were 1 of 1B, 2 of 1C, 1 of 2A, 1 of 2C, 3 of 5C and 1 of 6C. Surgery was done by manner of simple rod rotation on the concave side and in situ coronal bending. Coronal Cobb's angles, vertebral rotation angles and SRS-22 were measured on a plain standing X-ray and CT before and after surgery. Results : The mean follow up period was 25.7 months (range : 5-52). The mean number of screw positioning level was nine (6-12). The mean age was 16.4 years (range : 13-25) at surgery. The mean Risser grade was $3.7{\pm}0.9$. The apical vertebral rotation measured from the CT scans was $25.8{\pm}8.5^{\circ}$ vs. $9.3{\pm}6.7^{\circ}$ (p<0.001) and the Coronal Cobb's angle was $53.7{\pm}10.4^{\circ}$ vs. $15.4{\pm}6.5^{\circ}$ (p<0.001) preoperatively and postoperative, respectively. The SRS-22 improved from 71.9 preoperatively to 90.3 postoperatively. There were no complications related with the operations. Conclusion : SRR with pedicle screw instrumentation could be corrected successfully by axial rotation without complications. SRR might serve as a good option to correct AIS deformed curves of AIS.

Keywords

References

  1. Bridwell KH : Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : the basics and the controversies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 : 1095-1100, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199405000-00020
  2. Carlson BB, Burton DC, Asher MA : Comparison of trunk and spine deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 8 : 2, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-8-2
  3. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M : New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227 : 10-23, 1988
  4. Ecker ML, Betz RR, Trent PS, Mahboubi S, Mesgarzadeh M, Bonakdapour A, et al. : Computer tomography evaluation of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13 : 1141-1144, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198810000-00015
  5. Erkula G, Sponseller PD, Kiter AE : Rib deformity in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 12 : 281-287, 2003
  6. Ho EK, Upadhyay SS, Chan FL, Hsu LC, Leong JC : New methods of measuring vertebral rotation from computed tomographic scans. An intraobserver and interobserver study on girls with scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18 : 1173-1177, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199307000-00008
  7. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Lenke LG : Vertebral rotation and thoracic torsion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : what is the best radiographic correlate? J Spinal Disord Tech 18 : 139-147, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000159033.89623.bc
  8. Lea Plaza CA, Karsaclian M, Rocca C : Segmental scoliosis correlation : use of the Lea Plaza Frame. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29 : 398-404, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000092370.04734.8B
  9. Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER : Direct vertebral rotation : a new technique of three-dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29 : 343-349, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000109991.88149.19
  10. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, Blanke K, Schoenecker PL : Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74 : 1056-1067, 1992 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274070-00013
  11. Muschik M, Schlenzka D, Robinson PN, Kupferschmidt C : Dorsal instrumentation for idiopathic adolescent thoracic scoliosis : rod rotation versus translation. Eur Spine J 8 : 93-99, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050136
  12. Pollock FE, Pollock FE Jr : Idiopathic scoliosis : correction of lateral and rotational deformities using the Cotrel-Dubousset spinal instrumentation system. South Med J 83 : 161-165, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-199002000-00008
  13. Pratt RK, Burwell RG, Cole AA, Webb JK : Patient and parental perception of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery in comparison with surface and radiographic measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 1543-1550; discussion 1551-1552, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200207150-00012
  14. Schlenzka D, Poussa M, Muschik M : Operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Harrington-DTT versus Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res (297) : 155-160, 1993
  15. Suk SI, Kim JH, Kim SS, Lim DJ : Pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Eur Spine J 21 : 13-22, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1986-0
  16. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Chung YJ, Park YB : Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 : 1399-1405, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199506020-00012
  17. Tang X, Zhao J, Zhang Y : Radiographic, clinical, and patients' assessment of segmental direct vertebral body derotation versus simple rod derotation in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : a prospective, comparative cohort study. Eur Spine J 24 : 298-305, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3650-y

Cited by

  1. Is Convex Derotation Equally Effective as Concave Derotation for Achieving Adequate Correction of Selective Lenke's Type- 1 Scoliosis? vol.52, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.ijortho_447_16