References
- Berg, C.A.R., Bergendahl, V.C.B., Lundberg, B.K.S., & Tibell, L.A.E. (2003). Benefiting from an open ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 351-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145738
- Berry, D., & Fawkes, K. (2010). Constructing the components of a lab report using peer review. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(1), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed8000107
- Brigati, J.R., & Swann, J.M. (2015). Facilitating improvements in laboratory report writing skills with less grading: A laboratory report peer-review process. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 16(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v16i1.884
- Chinn, C.A., & Malhotra, B.A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluation inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
- Cicchetti, D. V., & Feinstein, A. R. (1990). High agreement, but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 551-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-M
- Deiner, L.J, Newsome, D., & Samaroo, D. (2012). Directed self-inquiry: A scaffold for teaching laboratory report writing. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 1151-1514.
- Doerr, H.M. (1997). Experiment, simulation and analysis: an integrated instructional approach to the concept of force. International Journal of Science Education, 19(3), 265-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190302
- Duit, R., & Tesch, M. (2010). On the role of the experiment in science teaching and learning - Visions and the reality of instructional practice. In M. Kalogiannakis, D. Stavrou & P. Michaelides (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Hands-On Science (pp. 17-30). Rethymno, Greece: University of Crete.
- Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
- Keys, C.W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grad writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 676-690. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<676::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-6
- Keys, C.W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
- Kim, H., & Song, J. (2012). Searching for effective strategies on teaching open-inquiry -Based on cases of a science high school carrying our KYPT problem solving activities-. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(1), 1489-1501.
- Klein, P.D. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-tolearn. Educational Psychology Review, 11(3), 203-270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021913217147
- Krystyniak, R.A., & Heikkinen, H.W. (2007). Analysis of verbal interactions during an extended, open inquiry general chemistry laboratory investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1160-1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20218
- Kundel, H. L., & Polansky, M. (2003). Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology, 228, 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2282011860
- Lim, S., Yang, I., Kim, S., Hong, E., & Lim, J. (2010). Investigation on the difficulties during elementary pre-service teachers' open-inquiry activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(2), 291-303.
- Millar, R. (1998). Rhetoric and reality: what practical work in science education really for. In J. Wellington (ed.), Practical Work in School Science (pp. 16-31). London: Routledge.
- Nellist, J., & Nicholle, B. (1986). ASE Science Teachers' Handbook. London: Hutchinson.
- Oliver-Hoyo, M. T. (2003). Designing a written assignment to promote the use of critical thinking skills in an introductory chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 889-903. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p889
- Park, J. (2005). Analysis of the characteristics and processes of the generation of scientific inquiry problems. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 50(4), 203-211.
- Park, J. (2013a). Developing and applying teaching materials to help students' generation of scientific-inquiry problems. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 63(4), 360-367. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.63.360
- Park, J. (2013b). Development and application of the checklist for finding inquiry problems, design of experiment and writing inquiry report. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Korean Physical Society, Daejeon: Daejeon Convention Center.
- Park, J., & Lee, K. (2012). Exploring the components and functions of scaffolding in open inquiry through factor analysis. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1204-1221. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1204
- Park, J., & Yang, H,-G. (2013, February). Helping students to design scientific experiment by themselves for open-inquiry approach. Paper presented at the 63th Conference of The Korean Association for Science Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
- Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The development of dynamic inquiry performances within an open inquiry setting: A comparison to guided inquiry setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137-1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20310
- Settlage, J. (2007). Demythologizing science teacher education: Conquering the false of open inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 461-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9060-9
- Schepmann, H.G., & Hughes, LA. (2006). Chemical research writing: A preparatory course for students capstone research. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(7), 1024-1028. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p1024
- Trautmann, N., MaKinster, J., & Avery, L. (2004). What makes inquiry so hard? (and why is it worth it?). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa static. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360-366.
- Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and Literacy in Science Education. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of "inquiry:"how preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 481-512. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20010
- Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenge and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383-399.
Cited by
- IDENTIFYING AND APPLYING FACTORS CONSIDERED IMPORTANT IN STUDENTS’ EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN IN SCIENTIFIC OPEN INQUIRY vol.16, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.932