경영과학 (Korean Management Science Review)

한국경영과학회 (The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국 ICT서비스산업의 개방형 혁신에 영향을 미치는 요소 분석 : 네트워크 서비스를 중심으로

Analysis on Determinant Affecting Open Innovation of Korean ICT Service Industry : Focusing on Network Service

  • 김응도 (충북대학교 의생명과학경영융합대학원) ;
  • 김홍범 (피츠버그대학교 정보과학대학원) ;
  • 배기수 (충북대학교 경영대학 경영학부)
  • Kim, Eung-Do (Graduate School of Health Science Business Convergence, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Hongbum (School of Information Sciences, University of Pittsburgh) ;
  • Bae, Khee-Su (Chungbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2015.10.21
  • 심사 : 2015.11.17
  • 발행 : 2015.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Due to the emergence of open innovation driven by development of network service technologies and convergence in ICT service industry, It is necessary for ICT service firms to examine their capabilities for open innovation. The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine determinants affecting open innovation in Korean ICT service industry. In order to analyze, this paper uses logistic and multiple regression models based on survey data of Korean ICT service firms. Estimation results show that external network for collaboration is positive on the technological innovation activity regardless of the innovation type. Specifically, user networks are significant in all types of technology innovation, revealing that it is important to innovation activities of the ICT service firms.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강명헌, "경제력 집중과 기술혁신", 경제사연구, 제41권, 제3호(1994), pp.3-25.
  2. 김성홍, 개방형 기술혁신을 위한 산업별 혁신 네트워크 구축전략 수립, 과학기술정책연구원 정책연구 2007-19, 2007.
  3. 박철순, "개방형 혁신 네트워크의 동태적 모형", 한국경영과학지, 제40권, 제1호(2015), pp.5-18.
  4. 복득규, 이원희, 한국제조업의 개방형 기술혁신 현황과 효과분석, 삼성경제연구원 Issue Paper, 2008.
  5. 손동원, "개방형 혁신과 흡수공간의 공진화 : 한국 중소기업의 혁신경로 관점", 경영과학, 제29권, 제3호(2012), pp.169-182. https://doi.org/10.7737/KMSR.2012.29.3.169
  6. 송종국, 이정원, 이달환, 김명관, 기업의 기술전략 변화와 정책 시사점, 과학기술정책연구원 정책연구 2002-15, 2002.
  7. 신현열, "우리나라 제조업의 업종별 시장구조와 혁신활동간의 관계분석", 한국은행 조사통계월보, 2004-11호(2004), pp.23-42.
  8. 윤충한, "기업의 R&D 지출과 경영자 주식소유와의 관계", 경제연구 제11권, 제2호(2002), pp.141-159.
  9. 이봉규, 김기연, 이치형, 정갑영, "이동통신 서비스-콘텐츠-플랫폼 사업자간 가치네트워크 분석", 정보통신정책연구, 제13권, 제4호(2006), pp.183-213.
  10. 이원영, 정진승, "시장구조와 기술혁신", 한국개발연구, 제7권, 제4호(1985), pp.177-131.
  11. 최계영, ICT 패러다임 변화와 중장기 정책과제, 정보통신정책연구원 Premium Report, 12-06, 2012.
  12. Acs, Z.J. and D.B. Audretsch, "Innovation in Large and Small Firms : An Empirical Analysis," American Economic Review, Vol.78, No.4(1988), pp.678-690.
  13. Afifi, A.A. and V. Clark, Computer-aided Multivariate Analysis, Van Nostrand, New York, 1990.
  14. Audretsch, D.B. and M. Vivarelli, "Small Firms and R&D Spillovers : Evidence from Italy," CEPR Discussion Paper, Vol.927(1994).
  15. Beugelsdijk, S. and M. Cornet, "A Far Friend Is Worth More Than a Good Neighbor : Proximity and Innovation in a Small Country," Journal of Management and Governance, Vol.6, No.2(2002), pp.169-188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015775321949
  16. Bound, J., C. Cummins, Z. Griliches, B.H. Hall, and A. Jaffe, "Who Does R&D and Who Patents?," in Griliches, Z.(ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, (1984), pp.21-54.
  17. Branstetter, L. and M. Sakakibara, "Japanese Research Consortia : A Microeconometric Analysis of Industrial Policy," Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.46, No.2(1998), pp.207-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00069
  18. Brown, M.G. and R.A. Svenson, "Measuring R&D Productivity," Research-Technology Management, Vol.41, No.6(1998), pp.30-35.
  19. Chesbrough, H., "The Era of Open Innovation," MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol.44, No.3(2003), pp.35-41.
  20. Chesbrough, H., "Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models," MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol.48, No.2(2007), pp.22-28.
  21. Cohen, W.M. and S. Klepper, "A Reprise of Size and R&D," The Economic Journal, Vol.106, No.437(1996), pp.925-951. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235365
  22. Cohen, W.M., R.C. Levin, and D.C. Mowery, "Firm Size and R&D Intensity : A Re-examination?," Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.35, No.4(1987), pp.543-563. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098587
  23. Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson, and J. Walsh, "Link and Impacts : The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D," Management Science, Vol.48, No.1(2002), pp.1-23. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
  24. Enkel, E. and O. Gassman. "Creative Imitation : Exploring the Case of Cross-industry innovation," R&D Management, Vol.40, No.3(2010), pp.256-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00591.x
  25. European Commission, Study on the Measurement of Intangible Assets and Associated Reporting Practices. Commission of the European Communities, Enterprise Directorate General, Brussels, 2003.
  26. Faems, D.B., Van Looy, and K. Debackere, "Interorganizational Collaboration and Innovation : Toward a Portfolio Approach," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.22, No.3(2005), pp.238-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00120.x
  27. Feldman, M.P., "Knowledge Complementarity and Innovation," Small Business Economics, Vol.6, No.5(1994), pp.363-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065139
  28. Feldman, M.P. and M.R. Kelley, "The Ex Ante Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers : Government R&D Policy, Economic Incentives and Private Firm Behavior," Research Policy, Vol. 35, No.10(2006), pp.1509-1521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.019
  29. Frey, L.R., C.H. Botan, and G.L. Kreps, Investigating Communication : An Introduction to Research Methodologies, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 2000.
  30. Fukugawa, N., "Determining Factors in Innovation of Small Firm Networks : A Case of Cross Industry Groups in Japan," Small Business Economics, Vol.27, No.2(2006), pp.181-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-0010-2
  31. Galende, J. and J.M. de la Fuente, "Internal Factors Determining a Firm's Innovative Behavior," Research Policy, Vol.32, No.5(2003), pp.715-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00082-3
  32. George, G., S.A. Zahra, and D.R. Wood Jr, "The Effects of Business-University Alliances on Innovative Output and Financial Performance : A Study of Publicly Traded Biotechnology Companies," Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.17, No.6(2002), pp.577-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00069-6
  33. Griliches, Z., "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators : A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.28(1990), pp.1661-1707.
  34. Gort, M. and S. Klepper, "Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations," The Economic Journal, Vol.92, No.367(1982), pp.630-653. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232554
  35. Hagedoorn, J. and M. Cloodt, "Measuring Innovative Performance : Is There an Advantage in Using Multiple Indicators?," Research Policy, Vol.32, No.8(2003), pp.1365-1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00137-3
  36. Han, J.K., N. Kim, and R.K. Srivastava, "Market Orientation and Organizational Performance : Is Innovation a Missing Link?," Journal of Marketing, Vol.62, No.4(1998), pp.30-45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252285
  37. Han, B.H. and D. Manry, "The Value-relevance of R&D and Advertising Expenditure : Evidence from Korea," International Journal of Accounting, Vol.39, No.2(2004), pp.155-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2004.02.002
  38. Jauch, L.R., W.F. Glueck, and R.N. Osborn, "Organizational Loyalty, Professional Commitment and Academic Research Productivity," Academic Management Journal, Vol.21, No.1(1978), pp.84-92. https://doi.org/10.2307/255664
  39. Jeffrey, L.C. and M. Morel, "The Valuation Relevance of R&D Expenditure: Time Series Evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol.14, No.3(2005), pp.304-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2004.10.007
  40. Kamien, M.I. and N.L. Schwartz, Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.
  41. Kim, E., D. Lee, K. Bae, and M. Rim, "Developing and Evaluating a New ICT Innovation System : A Case of Korea's Smart Media Industry," ETRI Journal, http://dx.doi.org/10.4218/etrij.15.0115.0059, 2015.
  42. Kim, H., E. Kim, D. Lee, S. Jung, and H. Moon, "Prioritizing Telecommunications Service Policies in South Korea : An Innovation System Approach," Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management, Vol.22, No.3(2015), pp.115-128. https://doi.org/10.21219/JITAM.2015.22.3.115
  43. Kleinknecht, A. and J.O.N. Reijnen, "Why Do Firms Cooperate on R&D? An Empirical Study," Research Policy, Vol.21, No.4(1992), pp.347-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(92)90033-Z
  44. Klepper, S., "Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle," American Economic Review, Vol.86, No.3(1996), pp.562-583.
  45. Klepper, S. and E. Graddy, "The Evolution of New Industries and the Determinants of Market Structure," Rand Journal of Economics, Vol.21, No.1(1990), pp.24-44.
  46. Kondo, M., "R&D Dynamics of Creating Patents in the Japanese Industry," Research Policy, Vol.28, No.6(1999), pp.587-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00129-2
  47. Kortum, S. and J. Lerner, "Does Venture Capital Spur Innovation?," Rand Journal of Economics, Vol.31, No.4(2000), pp.674-692. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696354
  48. Laursen, K. and A. Salter, "Open for Innovation : The Role of Open Innovativeness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U. K. Manufacturing Firms," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.27, No.2(2006), pp.131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  49. Lev, B. Intangibles Management, Measurement, and Reporting, Brookings Institute Press, Washington D.C., 2001.
  50. Levin, R.C., W.M. Cohen, and D.C. Mowery, "R&D Appropriability Opportunity, Market Structure : New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypothesis," American Economic Review, Vol.75, No.2(1985), pp.20-24.
  51. Lichtenthaler, U., "Open Innovation in Practice : An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.55, No.1(2008), pp.148-157. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.912932
  52. Lilien, G.L., P.D. Morrison, K. Searls, M. Sonnack, and E. von Hippel, "Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-generation Process for New Product Development," Management Science, Vol.48, No.8(2002), pp.1042-1059. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1042.171
  53. Love, J. and S. Roper, "The Determinants of Innovation : R&D Technology Transfer and Networking Effects," Review of Industrial Organization, Vol.15, No.1(1999), pp.43-64. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007757110963
  54. McQuail, D., "Functions of Communication : A Nonfunctionalist Overview," in C.R. Berger and S. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of Communication Science. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, 1987.
  55. Mohnen, P. and C. Hoareau, "What Type of Enterprise Forges Close Llinks with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from CIS 2," Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol.24, No.2-3(2003), pp.133-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1086
  56. Narver, J.C. and S.F. Slater, "The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability," Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, No.4(1990), pp.20-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251757
  57. National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1993.
  58. Okamuro, H., "The Effects of Inter-firm Co-operation : A Comparative Analysis of Small and Large Firms Using Micro Data," COE/RES Discussion Paper, No.66(2004).
  59. Okamuro, H., "Cooperative R&D by SMEs and Intellectual Property," Proceedings of the Japan Academy of Small Business Studies, Vol.24(2005), pp.3-16.
  60. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: The "Oslo Manual," OECD, Paris, 1996.
  61. Pakes, A. and Z. Griliches, "Patents and R&D at the Firm Level : A First Look," in Griliches Z.(ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, (1984), pp.55-72.
  62. Pavitt, K., "Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory," Research Policy, Vol.13, No.6(1984), pp.343-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
  63. Pavitt, K., M. Robinson, and J. Townsend, "The Size Distribution of Innovation Firms in the UK : 1945-1983," Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.35, No.3(1987), pp.297-316. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098636
  64. Perkmann, M. and K. Walsh, "University-Industry Relationships and Open Innovation : Towards a Research Agenda," International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol.9, No.4(2007), pp.259-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
  65. Phillips, D., "New Alliances for Policy and the Conduct of Research and Education," International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.6, No.5-6(1991), pp.478-487.
  66. Reams, R. University-Industry Research Partnerships. Quorum Books, Westport, 1986.
  67. Romijn, H. and M. Albaladejo, "Determinants of Innovation Capability in Small Electronics and Software Firms in Southeast England," Research Policy, Vol.31, No.7(2002), pp.1053-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00176-7
  68. Rosenberg, N. Inside the Black Box : Technology and Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982.
  69. Rosenfeld, S.A., "Does Cooperation Enhance Competitiveness? Assessing the Impacts of Inter-firm Collaboration," Research Policy, Vol.25, No.2(1996), pp.247-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00835-7
  70. Salomo, S., F. Steinhoff, and V. Trommsdorff, "The Concept of Customer Orientation in Substantial innovation Projects and Its Impact on New Product Development Success," International Journal of Technology Management Vol.26, No.5-6(2003), pp.442-463. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2003.003417
  71. Santoro, M.D. and A.K. Chakrabarti, "Firm Size and Technology Centrality in Industry-University Interactions," Research Policy, Vol.31, No.7(2002), pp.1163-1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1
  72. Schartinger, D., C. Rammer, M.M. Fischer, and J. Frohlich, "Knowledge Interactions between Universities and Industry in Austria : Sectoral Patterns and Determinants," Research Policy, Vol.31, No.3(2002), pp.303-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00111-1
  73. Scott, J.T., "Firm versus Industry Variability in R&D Intensity," in Griliches Z.(ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, (1984), pp.233-245.
  74. Shaw, B., "User-Supplier Links and Innovation," in Dodgson, M. and R. Rothwell (Eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 1994.
  75. Shefer, D. and A. Frenkel, "Firm Size and Innovation : An Empirical Analysis," Technovation, Vol.25, No.1(2004), pp.25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00152-4
  76. Sorensen, J.B. and T.E. Stuart, "Aging Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.45, No.1(2000), pp.81-112. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666980
  77. Souitaris, V., "Technological Trajectories as Moderators of Firm-level Determinants of Innovation," Research Policy, Vol.31, No.6(2002), pp.877-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00154-8
  78. Stuart, T.E., S.Z. Ozdemir, and W.W. Ding, "Vertical Alliance Networks : The Case of University-Biotechnology-Pharmaceutical Alliance Chains," Research Policy Vol.36, No.4(2007), pp.477-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.016
  79. Tether, B., "Who Co-operates for Innovation, and Why : An Empirical Analysis," Research Policy, Vol.31, No.6(2002), pp.947-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
  80. Tripsas, M., S. Schrader, and M. Sobrero, "Discouraging Opportunistic Behavior in Collaborative R&D : A New Role for Government," Research Policy, Vol.24, No.3(1995), pp.367-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00771-K
  81. Vanhaverbecke, W., V. Van de Vrade, and H.W. Chesbrough, "Understanding the Advantages of Open Innovation Practices in Corporate Venturing in Terms of Real Options," Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol.17, No.4(2008), pp.251-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00499.x
  82. von Hippel, E., "Economics of Product Development by Users : The Impact of Sticky Local Information," Management Science, Vol.44, No.5(1998), pp.629-644. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.5.629
  83. von Hippel, E. Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005.
  84. Wallsten, S.J., "The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D : The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program," RAND Journal of Economics, Vol.31, No.1(2000), pp.82-100. https://doi.org/10.2307/2601030
  85. West, J. and S. Gallagher, "Challenges of Open Innovation : The Paradox of Firm Investment in Open-Source Software," R&D Management, Vol.36, No.3(2004), pp.319-331.
  86. West, J., A. Salter, W. Vanhaverbeke, and H. Chesbrough, "Open Innovation : The next decade," Research Policy, Vol.43, No.5(2014), pp.805-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001
  87. Zucker, L.G. and M.R. Darby, "Capturing Technological Opportunity via Japan's Star Scientists : Evidence from Japanese Firms' Biotech Patents and Products," Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.26, No.1(2001), pp.37-58. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007832127813
  88. Zucker, L.G., M.R. Darby, and J.S. Armstrong, "Commercializing Knowledge : University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology," Management Science, Vol.48, No.1(2002), pp.138-153. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.138.14274
  89. Zucker, L.G., M.R. Darby, and M.B. Brewer, "Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises," American Economic Review, Vol.88, No.1(1998), pp.290-306.