DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Emergence of Environmental Regulation in Complex System Paradigm

복잡계 패러다임에서 환경규제의 출현에 대한 연구

  • Lee, Han-Woong (Business Service Center for Global Environmental Regulation Industrial Environmental Division, Korean Institute of Industrial Technology) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Hun (Business Service Center for Global Environmental Regulation Industrial Environmental Division, Korean Institute of Industrial Technology) ;
  • Bae, Ha-Na (Business Service Center for Global Environmental Regulation Industrial Environmental Division, Korean Institute of Industrial Technology) ;
  • Seo, Yong-Mo (School of Business, Chungnam National University)
  • 이한웅 (한국생산기술연구원 국가청정생산지원센터 환경규제대응실) ;
  • 김성훈 (한국생산기술연구원 국가청정생산지원센터 환경규제대응실) ;
  • 배하나 (한국생산기술연구원 국가청정생산지원센터 환경규제대응실) ;
  • 서용모 (충남대학교 경영학부)
  • Received : 2015.08.17
  • Accepted : 2015.10.08
  • Published : 2015.10.31

Abstract

The primary purpose of this paper is to find out the environmental regulation in our global society with complex system concept. After the industrial revolution, there were working toward solving various problems while there has been an industry advancement. But, there are various issues that a simple international trade or economic technologic levels were not solved. The evolution of technologies through complex systemic thought are not accidental issues. These issues build and provide a predictable technology innovation that system was emergent a new order. With complex systemic thought, the earth that was facing environmental problems was in the phrase edge of chose. These conditions played the trigger role for the solving various problems in environmental regulations but they don't get along well together. There were no causal relationship between structural elements. This paper describes an emergence of new order through these interactions in environmental regulation. These environmental regulations make desperate efforts not only public sectors but also private or/and firms that make an emergence of new order with the critical point reached. Also, we provide the understanding base an environmental regulation with new order for uncertainty.

본 연구는 20세기 이후 급속한 과학기술의 발달로 산업의 공업화 및 인구의 도시화 등으로 인류의 생활터전인 환경이 위협받는 현 시점에, 이슈가 되고 있는 환경문제의 해결방안인 환경규제를 복잡계적 사고로 해석을 한 것이다. 산업혁명이후 출현한 산업의 고도화 과정에서 발생하고 있는 다양한 문제점들을 해결하기 위하여 오래전부터 많은 노력들이 시도되었다. 하지만 이러한 현상을 이해하기 위해서는 단순한 무역수준이나 경제 기술적 수준에서 해석할 수 없는 문제가 제기 되고 있다. 이러한 이슈들에 대해 복잡계적 사고를 통해 기술의 진화에 대한 우발성이 아니라 그들이 만들어낸 차이를 인식하고 혼돈의 가장자리에서 새로운 질서를 창발하는 현상에서 복잡계 시스템을 이해하고 선제적 대응 및 관리에 대한 기술적 혁신을 예측할 수 있는 기반을 제공하고자 한다. 복잡계적 사고로 분석해보면 지구가 처한 환경문제는 혼돈의 가장자리에 자리잡고 있다. 이러한 부분은 공공적인 부분에서 주도를 하고 있지만 이들만의 노력만으로는 해결이 되지 않는 다양한 구성요소들 간의 상호작용을 통한 인과관계를 형성하고 있다. 본 연구는 이러한 상호작용으로 환경규제에 대한 새로운 질서의 창발현상을 설명하고 있으며 환경규제를 공공적인 부분만의 질서가 아니라 민간 혹은 기업에서의 의지와 행동이 임계점에 도달하여 새로운 질서를 창발하는 노력이 필요함을 제시하고자 한다. 따라서 불확실성에 대한 환경규제의 새로운 질서를 이해하려는 기반을 제공하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. OECD, The environmental effect of trade. OECD, Paris. 1994.
  2. Youn-Guoy Moon, Seung-Hyun Seo, A Study on the Construction of Governamce in Complex Systems, Korean Association for Public Management, 23(3), 121-144. 2009. https://doi.org/10.24210/kapm.2009.23.3.005
  3. Ki-Hyung Kim, A Study on the Usefulness and Applicability of Complexity Theory in Policy Studies. KOREAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. 47(2). 281-312. 2009.
  4. Arthur, W. B. "Complexity and Economy", Science Vol. 284, pp. 107-109, 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5411.107
  5. Simon, H. A, "Near Decomposability and Complexity : How a Mind Resides in a Brain", The Mind, the Brain, and Complexity Adoptive system, Morowitz, H. J. and Singer, J. L ed., Reading, MA : Addition-Wesly, 1995.
  6. Min-Jung Lim, Moon-Hee Park, A Study on Fashion Design at Chaos Theory Characteristic, Journal of Digital Design, 12(2), pp. 439-448. 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2012.12.2.041
  7. Byung-won Min, Domestic politics which solved by complex system, Seoul, SERI. 2006.
  8. Young-Soo Yun, Seung-Byung Chae, An Introduction to complex system, Seoul, SERI. 2005.
  9. Young-Duck Jung et al., Rational Choice and Neosystemism, Seoul, DaeYoung Press. 1999.
  10. Seok-Jun Kim, New Governance and Cybver Governance Reasech, Seoul, DaeYoung Press. 2001.
  11. Chang-Koo Kang, A Study on the Effect and Political Implication on the International Environmental Agreements, Collected Papers in SangJiYoungseo University, Vol. 25. pp. 95-141. 2005.
  12. The Ministry of Environment, Climate Change Agreement Respondence system Research. 2002.
  13. Shin-wha Lee et al., Global Environment Governance theory and Practice, 2007.
  14. David L. Levy and Peter J. Newell, "Introduction: The Business of Global Environmental Governance",: in David L. Levy and Peter J. Nwell(eds.) The Business of Global Environmental Governance (Cambridge, MA, the MIT Press, 2004), pp. 2-3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12016-004-0001-5
  15. Guidebook for Environmental introduce National Standard refurbishing project for the Cleanness Production Groundwork, Korea Association of Standard. 2010.
  16. OECD. Fostering Innovation for Green Growth, OECD Green Growth Studies, p. 33. 2011.
  17. Rothwell, Roy. Industrial Innovation and Government Environmental Regulation: Some lessons from the Past. Technovation, 12(7): 447-458. 1992. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(92)90055-M
  18. Jaffe, Adam B., Steven R. Peterson, Paul R. Portney and Robert N. Stavins. Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1): 132-163. 1995.
  19. Palmer, Karen, Wallace E. Oates and Paul R. Portney. Tightening Environmental Standards: The benefit cost or no-cost paradigm. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9: 119-132. 1995. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.119
  20. Joo-Hyun Cho, Focusing on Korean Manufacturing Industries: Environmental Regulation Implementation and Innovation, Economic Research, 52(4), pp. 279-313. 2003.
  21. Man-Ok Kang, A Panel Data Analysis of the Effects of Environmental Regulation on Competitiveness of the Korean Manufacturing Sector, Environment Politics, 14(1), pp. 169-193, 2006.
  22. Lanoie, Paul, Michel Patry, and Richard Lajeunesse. Environmental Regulation and Productivity: Testing the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30: 121-128. 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11123-008-0108-4
  23. Porter, Michael E. and Claas van der Linde. Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review: 120-134, 1995.
  24. Vries, Frans P. de and Cees Withagen. Innovation and Environmental Stringency: The Case of Sulfur Dioxide Abatement. Center Discussion Paper No. 2005-18. 2005.
  25. Il-jae Yoo, A Study on Countermeasures and application plan of EU Chemical material management(REACH) at Industry Safety Health Law. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. 2011.