DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Issue Analysis on 'Trade Secret Claim' in 「Chemicals Control Act」 and 「Amendment on Occupational Safety and Health Act(1917-227)」

「화학물질관리법」과 「산업안전보건법」의 영업비밀 사전 허가 제도 도입과 관련한 쟁점 분석

  • Kim, Shinbum (Wonjin Institute for Occupational & Environmental Health) ;
  • Lee, Yun Keun (Wonjin Institute for Occupational & Environmental Health) ;
  • Choi, Youngeun (Wonjin Institute for Occupational & Environmental Health)
  • Received : 2015.12.04
  • Accepted : 2015.12.18
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

Objectives: The major objectives of this study are to review the issues surrounding trade secret claims in the Chemicals Control Act and Amendment on Occupational Safety and Health Act(1917-227) and to propose a way of improving the reliability of chemical information in MSDSs, labels and National Chemical Survey results. Materials: To review the issues on trade secret claims, we made an analysis frame which was divided into three steps: Value and Problem Recognition; New Regulation Design; and Enforcement and Amendment. We then compared Korean issues with issues from the United States' Hazard Communication Standard and Emergency Planning & Community Right-to-Know Act, Canada's Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System and Hazardous Materials Information Review Act and the European Union's Regulation on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of substances and Mixtures. Results: The stage of right-to-know development in Korea has passed the Value and Problem Recognition phase, so efforts are needed to elaborately design new regulation. Conclusions: We recommend two ways to improve right-to-know in Korea. First, strict examination of the quality of documents for trade secret claims is very important. Second, trade secrets should be limited to less-hazardous substances.

Keywords

References

  1. Bennett D. The right to know about chemical hazards in Canada, 1982-2006. New Solut. 2008;18(2):233-243 https://doi.org/10.2190/NS.18.2.l
  2. Choi JW, Kim DS, Kim HS, Park HC, Yoon SJ. A Study on Implementation of MSDS systems & their Promotion. KOSHA. 2003
  3. ELC(Environment and Labor Committee). Review Report on Amendment for Occupational Safety and Health Act(No. 17227). 2015
  4. GOC(Government of Canada). Hazardous Product Regulations regulatory impact analysis statement. Canada Gaz. 2014;148(32)
  5. GOC(Government of Canada). Hazardous Products Regulations(SOR/2015-17). Canada Gaz. PartII 2015; 149(3):343-476
  6. KELA(Korean Environmental Law Association). Public hearing for chemical information disclosure. 2015
  7. Kim KY, Cho KH, Lee YH, Yi DW, Hwang IY et al. A Study on the Comprehensibility of Material Safety Data Sheet Control and Its Improvement on REACH. KOSHA, 2007
  8. Kim SB, Lee YK, Choi YE. How to improve the reliability of MSDS and labels?: A critical review on the U.S. Standard 29 CFR Part 1910 Hazard Communication. J. Korean Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2015a;25(1):1-12 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2015.25.1.1
  9. Kim SB, Lee YK, Choi YE. How to Improve the Reliability of MSDS and Labels?(2): A Review on the EU CLP(REGULATION(EC) No 1272/2008). J. Korean Soc. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2015b;25(2):115-125 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2015.25.2.115
  10. Kim YJ, Yoo IT, Jin SJ, Yoo EH, Kim HM et al. Amendment for Occupational Safety and Health Act(No. 17227). 2015
  11. Lee JH, Lee KS, Park JW, Jo JH. A Research on the Actual Conditions of Trade Secrets in the MSDSs and Improvement of the Relevant System. KOSHA 2009
  12. Lee KS, Seung SW, Hwang SS, Yoon SJ, Yang HS et al. A study on the chemical substance information control and its improvement. KOSHA. 2005
  13. Lee KS, Jo JH, Choi JH, Choi SB, Lee JH. A study on the ways of improving the reliability of MSDS written and controlled in workplaces. KOSHA. 2007
  14. McLellan JW. Hazardous substances and the right to know in Canada. Int. Labour Rev. 1989;128(5):639-650
  15. MoE(Korean Ministry of Environment). Chemicals Control Act. 2013
  16. MoE(Korean Ministry of Environment). Materials for the conference to discuss on the range of information disclosure and review process. 2015a
  17. MoE(Korean Ministry of Environment). Materials for the 2nd meeting of Chemical Management Committee. 2015b
  18. MoE(Korean Ministry of Environment). Materials for the 3rd meeting of Chemical Management Committee. 2015c
  19. MoE(Korean Ministry of Environment). Materials for the 4th meeting of Chemical Management Committee. 2015d
  20. MoE(Korean Ministry of Environment). Notice on Regulation for Management of Chemical Survey Result and Disclosure of Information(Notice No. 2015-700). 2015e
  21. NA(The National Assembly of Republic of Korea). Parliamentary information system. [cited 2015 Nov. 17] Available from http://likms.assembly.go.kr/
  22. Roberts L. A corrosive fight over California's toxics law. Science. 1989;243(4889):306-309 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2911742
  23. Wolf S. Fear and loathing about the public right to know: the surprising success of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act. J L Use Envtl L. 1996;11(2):217-254