DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Frictional behaviour of epoxy reinforced copper wires composites

  • Ahmed, Rehab I. (Production Engineering and Mechanical Design Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University) ;
  • Moustafa, Moustafa M. (Production Engineering and Mechanical Design Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University) ;
  • Talaat, Ashraf M. (Production Engineering and Mechanical Design Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University) ;
  • Ali, Waheed Y. (Production Engineering and Mechanical Design Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University)
  • Received : 2015.04.02
  • Accepted : 2015.11.27
  • Published : 2015.09.25

Abstract

Friction coefficient of epoxy metal matrix composites were investigated. The main objective was to increase the friction coefficient through rubber sole sliding against the epoxy floor coating providing appropriate level of resistance. This was to avoid the excessive movement and slip accidents. Epoxy metal matrix composites were reinforced by different copper wire diameters. The epoxy metal matrix composites were experimentally conducted at different conditions namely dry, water and detergent wetted sliding, were the friction coefficient increased as the number of wires increased. When the wires were closer to the sliding surface, the friction coefficient was found to increase. The friction coefficient was found to increase with the increase of the copper wire diameter in epoxy metal matrix composites. This behavior was attributed to the fact that as the diameter and the number of wires increased, the intensity of the electric field, generated from electric static charge increased causing an adhesion increase between the two sliding surfaces. At water wetted sliding conditions, the effect of changing number of wires on friction coefficient was less than the effect of wire diameter. The presence of water and detergent on the sliding surfaces decreased friction coefficient compared to the dry sliding. When the surfaces were detergent wetted, the friction coefficient values were found to be lower than that observed when sliding in water or dry condition.

Keywords

References

  1. Derler, S., Kausch, F. and Huber, R. (2008), "Analysis of factors influencing the friction coefficients of shoe sole materials", Safety Sci., 46(5), 822-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.01.010
  2. El-Sherbiny, Y.M., Mohamed, M.K. and Ali, W.Y. (2011), "Friction coefficient displayed by footwear walking against rubber floorings fitted by cylindrical treads", J. Egyptian Soc. Tribol., 8(1), 1-12.
  3. El-Sherbiny, Y.M., Samy, A.M. and Ali, W.Y. (2010), "Friction coefficient of rubber sliding against dusty indoor flooring", J. Egyptian Soc. Tribol., 7(4), 11-25.
  4. Gabriel, P., Thomas, A.G. and Busfield, J.J.C. (2010), "Influence of interface geometry on rubber friction", Wear, 268(5-6), 747-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2009.11.019
  5. Gronqvist, R. (1995), "Mechanisms of friction and assessment of slip resistance of new and used footwear soles on contaminated floors", Ergonomics 38, 224-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925100
  6. Heinrich, G. and Kluppel, M. (2008), "Rubber friction, tread deformation and tire traction", Wear, 265(7-8), 1052-1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.016
  7. Kai, W.L., Horng, H.W. and Yu-Chang, L. (2006), "The effect of shoe sole tread groove depth on the friction coefficient with different tread groove widths, floors and contaminants", Appl. Ergon., 37(6), 743-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.007
  8. Li, K.W., Yu, R. and Han, X.L. (2007), "Physiological and psychophysical responses in handling maximum acceptable weights under different footwear-floor friction conditions", Appl. Ergon., 38(3), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.06.006
  9. Li, K.W., Chang, C.C. and Chang, W.R. (2008), "Slipping of the foot on the floor when pulling a pallet truck", Appl. Ergon., 39(6), 812-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2007.06.002
  10. Liu, L., Li, K.W., Lee, Y.H., Chen, C.C. and Chen, C.Y. (2010), "Friction measurements on "anti-slip" floors under shoe sole, contamination, and inclination conditions", Safety Sci., 48(10), 1321-1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.04.014
  11. Maeda, K., Bismarck, A. and Briscoe, B. (2007), "Effect of bulk deformation on rubber adhesion", Wear, 263(7-12), 1016-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2007.02.002
  12. Miller, J.M. (1983), "Slippery" work surface: toward a performance definition and quantitative coefficient of friction criteria", J. Safety Res., 14, 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(83)90042-7
  13. Mohamed, M.K., Abdel-Jaber, G.T. and Ali, W.Y. (2014), "Abrasive wear of epoxy composites filled by abrasive particles and reinforced by polyamide fibres", Materialwiss. Werkst. 45(2), 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201400193
  14. Mohamed, M.K., Samy, A.M. and Ali, W.Y. (2010), "Friction coefficient of rubber shoes sliding against ceramic flooring", Tribologie Fachtagung, Gottengen, Germany, September.
  15. Patnaik, A., Satapathy, A., Chand, N., Barkoula, N.M. and Biswas, S. (2010), "Solid particle erosion wear characteristics of fiber and particulate filled polymer composites: a review", Wear, 268(5-6), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2009.07.021