Creative Apparel Design Process Approach Using Architectural and Artistic Influence

  • Received : 2015.08.31
  • Accepted : 2015.12.29
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

Creativity is an ever-increasing research area related to fashion design, namely the documentation and dissemination of creative scholarship. The purpose of this project is to apply creative bridge or creative leap theory to the development of an existing designer's garment collection using the creative design process of an architect. A single case study design was used to investigate the phenomenon of design process creative leap using a direct observation. Results indicate the difficult challenge of producing new and individualized silhouettes for the marketability of clothing, it is apparent that new methods of fostering creativity in designers through non-traditional approaches would benefit the education of apparel designers. Through targeted design practice, educators and practitioners can apply the principles of scientific inquiry into design processes to solve a problem, address a challenge, or create based on personal inspirations.

Keywords

References

  1. Bye, E., & Sohn, M. (2010). Technology, tradition, and creativity in apparel designers: A study of designers in three US companies. Fashion Practice, 2(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.2752/175693810X12774625387477
  2. Cross, N. (1997). Descriptive models of creative design: Application to an example. Design Studies, 18(4) 427-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00010-0
  3. Cross, N. (2007). Forty years of design research. Design studies, 28(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.11.004
  4. Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solving. Design Studies (22)5, 425-437
  5. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1990). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York:McGraw Hill.
  6. Friedman, K. (2003). Theory construction in design research: Criteria: approaches, and methods. Design Studies, 24(6), 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00039-5
  7. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.
  8. Goldschmidt, G. (1990) Linkography: Assessing design productivity. In Cybernetics and Systems '90, Proceedings of the Tenth European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research (291-298). Singapore: World Scientific.
  9. Goldschmidt, G. (2003). Cognitive economy in design reasoning. In U. Lindemaan (Ed.) Human behaviour in design (53-62). Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  10. Goldschmidt, G., & Tatsa, D. (2005). How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity. Design Studies 26(6) 593-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.02.004
  11. Kolodner, J. L., & Wills, L. M. (1996). Powers of observation in creative design. Design Studies, 17(4), 385-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00021-X
  12. LaBat, K. L., & Sokolowski, S. L. (1999). A three-stage design process applied to an industry-university textile product design project. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9901700102
  13. Lamb, J. M., & Kallal, M. J. (1992). A conceptual framework for apparel design. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(2), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9201000207
  14. Liu, Y. T., & Group, A. (1996). Is designing one search or two? A model of design thinking involving symbolism and connectionism. Design Studies, 17(4), 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00018-X
  15. Liu, Y. T. (2000). Creativity or novelty?: Cognitive-computational versus social-cultural. Design Studies, 21(3), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00013-7
  16. Mann, L., & Tekmen Araci, Y. (2014). Describing creativity in design across disciplines. Paper presented at the 10th Design Thinking Research Symposium-Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
  17. McKelvey, K., & Munslow, J. (2011). Fashion design: Process, innovation and practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  18. Pollack, S. (director), Yamagata, H. (producer), Buchthal, S. (producer), Hoffman, M. (producer), Lacy, S. (producer), & Guilfoyle, U. (producer). (2006). The Sketches of Frank Gehry [documentary]. United States: Sony Pictures Classics.
  19. Regan, C., Kincade, D., & Sheldon, G. (1998). Applicability of the engineering design process theory in the apparel design process. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 16(1), 36-46 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9801600105
  20. Samuel, A., & Lewis, W. (1990). Industry centred co-operative learning programmes in engineering design. 2nd Annual Convention and Conference: New pathways and methods in engineering education; Conference Proceedings, 615.
  21. Sinha, P. (2002). Creativity in fashion. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 2(4), 1-16.
  22. Yildiz, S., & Duzgun, H. (2014). Fashion inspiring from architecture; a workshop at architectural design studio: "ARCHIFASHION". In EDULEARN14 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (7374-7380). Spain: World Scientific.
  23. Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  24. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  25. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.