구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제31권4호
  • /
  • Pages.378-386
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

하악에서 완압형 자성 어태치먼트를 부착한 임플란트-자연치 피개 의치: 10년 증례보고

Mandibular implant-natural tooth retained overdenture using magnetic attachment with stress breaker

  • 박은철 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이수연 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김희중 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Park, Eun-Chul (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Su-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 투고 : 2015.08.28
  • 심사 : 2015.12.08
  • 발행 : 2015.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

피개 의치는 의치의 안정과 유지력 증가라는 장점을 갖지만 지대치가 우식 또는 치주질환에 이환되기 쉬우며 의치의 두께가 얇아짐으로써 의치가 파절되기 쉽다는 단점도 갖고 있다. 자성 어태치먼트 피개 의치는 수직적 유지력은 크지만 수평적 유지력은 작으므로 지대치나 임플란트에 덜 위해한 힘을 가하며, 다른 기계적 유지장치에 비해 마모나 파손 등이 적다는 장점이 있다. 피개 의치에서 나타나는 의치의 파절은 의치상의 두께가 얇아져서 발생하기도 하지만, 연조직과 경조직, 임플란트와 자연치의 압하량 차이로 인해 발생하기도 한다. 이를 보상하기 위해 silicone ball이 자석 안에 삽입되어있는 자성 어태치먼트가 개발되었으며, 이를 이용해 피개 의치를 제작한 증례에서 우수한 결과가 나타나 보고하고자 한다.

Overdenture has the advantage of improving the stability and retention of the denture but the abutment may be easily affected by caries or periodontal disease and the thin denture can be easily broken. The magnetic attachment overdenture has a high vertical retention but a low horizontal retention, thus, exerting a less disruptive force to the abutment or implant and shows less abrasion or damage compared to other mechanical retainers. Denture fractures in overdenture is caused by the thin denture base as the attachment is inserted, but it may also be caused by the difference in detrusion between soft tissue and hard tissue, and between an implant and a natural tooth. To compensate this shortcoming, a magnetic attachment with a silicone ball inserted in the magnet was developed as we report a successful case using this specific type of magnetic attachment overdenture.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Fueki K, Kimoto K, Ogawa T, Garrett NR. Effect of implant-supported or retained dentures on masticatory performance: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:470-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60147-4
  2. Fitzpatrick B. Standard of care for the edentulous mandible: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:71-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.007
  3. Kim HY, Shin SW, Lee JY. Standardizing the evaluation criteria on treatment outcomes of mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:325-32. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.325
  4. Lord JL, Teel S. The overdenture: patient selection, use of copings, and follow-up evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1974;32:41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(74)90097-3
  5. Takanashi Y, Penrod JR, Lund JP, Feine JS. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:181-6.
  6. Tokuhisa M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:128-34.
  7. Ichikawa T, Horiuchi M, Wigianto R, Matsumoto N. In vitro study of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: the influence of stud attachments on load transfer to the implant and soft tissue. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:394-9.
  8. Kimoto S, Pan S, Drolet N, Feine JS. Rotational movements of mandibular two-implant overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:838-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01723.x
  9. Sheets CG, Earthman JC. Tooth intrusion in implant-assisted prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77: 39-45. Review. Erratum in: J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70172-0
  10. Elsyad MA, El-Waseef FA, Al-Mahdy YF, Fouad MM. A comparison of mandibular denture base deformation with different impression techniques for implant overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24 Suppl A100:127-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02395.x
  11. Gonda T, Maeda Y, Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Fracture incidence in mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:178-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60026-1
  12. Dong J, Ikebe K, Gonda T, Nokubi T. Influence of abutment height on strain in a mandibular overdenture. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:594-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01602.x
  13. Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:537-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70208-8
  14. Assuncao WG, Tabata LF, Barao VA, Rocha EP. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:766-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01851.x
  15. Rissin L, House JE, Manly RS, Kapur KK. Clinical comparison of masticatory performance and electromyographic activity of patients with complete dentures, overdentures, and natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:508-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80181-4
  16. Choi M, Acharya V, Berg RW, Marotta J, Green CC, Barbizam JV, White SN. Resinous denture base fracture resistance: effects of thickness and teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:53-9.
  17. Gonda T, Ikebe K, Ono T, Nokubi T. Effect of magnetic attachment with stress breaker on lateral stress to abutment tooth under overdenture. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:1001-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01324.x
  18. Sadowsky SJ, Caputo AA. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:327-34. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109378
  19. Weinberg LA. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:19-31.
  20. Muhlemann HR. Tooth mobility: a review of clinical aspects and research findings. J Periodontol 1967;38:686-713. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.6_part2.686