한국식품영양학회지 (The Korean Journal of Food And Nutrition)

  • 제28권6호
  • /
  • Pages.1071-1081
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1225-4339(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-4992(eISSN)
한국식품영양학회 (The Korean Society of Food and Nutrition)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

친환경오이와 일반오이의 이화학적 특성 및 소비자 기호도

Physicochemical Analyses and Korean Consumers' Acceptability of Environment-Friendly and Conventionally Grown Cucumber

  • 김성아 (부산대학교 식품영양학과, 김치연구소) ;
  • 전순실 (순천대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 이지현 (부산대학교 식품영양학과, 김치연구소)
  • Kim, Sung-a (Dept. of Food Science and Nutrition and Kimchi Research Institute, Pusan National University) ;
  • Chun, Soon-Sil (Dept. of Food and Nutrition, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Lee, Jeehyun (Dept. of Food Science and Nutrition and Kimchi Research Institute, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2015.12.10
  • 심사 : 2015.12.24
  • 발행 : 2015.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

친환경농산물이 많이 소비되고 있는 반면에 소비자의 기호도에 관한 연구는 부족한 실정이다. 본 연구의 목적은 국내에서 시판되는 오이를 생식으로 섭취할 경우 소비자의 기호도에 차이가 있는지를 알아보고, 친환경오이와 일반오이에 대한 소비자 외관 기호도 차이가 있는지, 그리고 친환경오이와 일반오이의 물리화학적 특성을 연구하고자 하였다. 9점척도법을 이용하여 백다다기오이, 가시오이, 무농약미니오이, 유기농가시오이, 유기농조선오이에 대한 소비자의 기호도를 조사하였고, 전반적인 기호도에서는 백다다기오이, 유기농조선오이, 유기농가시오이를 선호하였다. 그러나 오이에 대한 기호도와 선호도가 다른 소비자의 소그룹이 있었다. 외관 기호도를 평가하였을 때, 친환경농산물 여부에 관계없이 유기농가시오이를 가장 선호하였다. 물리화학적 특성으로 껍질과 과육의 색도, 오이의 길이, 둘레, 무게, 수분활성도, 당도, 조직감(경도, 부서지는 정도)을 측정한 결과, 수분활성도와 경도를 제외한 모든 특성에서 시료간에 유의적인 차이가 있었다(p<0.05). 백다다기오이의 당도는 3.8 brix로 오이 시료 중 가장 높았고, 그 다음으로는 무농약미니오이와 유기농조선오이의 순이었다. 백다다기오이, 유기농조선오이, 유기농가시오이는 부서지는 정도가 다른 시료보다 높았다. 명도는 백다다기오이가 가장 높았으며, 무농약미니오이, 유기농가시오이, 가시오이 사이에는 유의적인 차이가 없었다.

Environment-friendly agricultural products are consumed widely, but little is known about consumers' acceptability. The objectives of this study were to 1) determine consumers' acceptability of cucumber when consumed raw, 2) determine differences in appearance liking between environment-friendly and conventionally grown cucumber samples, and 3) analyze the physicochemical properties of cucumber. White dadagi, gasi, non-pesticide mini cucumber, organic gasi, and organic Joseon cucumber samples were evaluated for consumers' acceptability using a nine-point hedonic scale; White dadagi, organic Joseon, and organic gasi cucumber samples showed the highest acceptability scores. However, there were three consumer segmentations differing their degree of cucumber liking and preference. Consumers liked the appearance of organic gasi best. Consumers' preference of cucumbers did not change upon evaluation of the acceptability of the appearance of whole fruit with and without a label indicating an environment-friendly status. Additionally, the physicochemical properties of the cucumbers-including color (skin and flesh), length, circumference, weight, water activity, brix, and texture (hardness and fracturability)-were measured. All measurements showed significant differences among samples, with the exception of water activity and hardness. White dadagi was 3.8 brix, which was the highest among cucumbers, followed by non-pesticide mini cucumber and organic Joseon. White dadagi, organic Joseon, and organic gasi showed greater fracturability than the other cucumber samples.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae SE, Yun JS, Lee JS, Kim CH, Yun GS. 2004. Analysis on the characteristics of consumer's consumption types of environmently friendly agricultural products. Korean J Community Living Sci 15:149-163
  2. Choi MK, Seo HC, Baek SH. 2010. The influence of environment- friendly agricultural products (EAPs) perception of parents in Chung-buk area on EAPs consumption behavior. Korean J Food Nutr 23:269-275
  3. Cochran WG, Cox GM. 1992. Experimental Designs. 2nd ed. Chap. 4, pp. 117-126. John Wiley & Sons
  4. Han IS. 2014. Study about using methods of natural enemies to control cucumber major pests in greenhouse. Ph.D. Thesis. Kongju National Univ. Gongju. Korea
  5. Han SK. 2007. Determination of fertigation program for cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). PhD Dessertation. Chonbuk National Univ. Jeonju. Korea
  6. Hartman Group. 2000. The Organic Consumer Profile. Bellevue, WA. January 2000
  7. Heo SW, Kim H. 2003. Marketing strategies and consumption situations of environment-friendly agricultural products in the metropolitan area. Korean J Org Agr 11:16-38
  8. Heo SW, Kim H. 2004. Green marketing strategies and willingness to pay for environment-friendly agricultural products in the metropolitan area. Korean J Org Agr 12:317-331
  9. Heo SW, Kim H. 2010. An analysis on consumer's satisfaction attributes and factors of environmental-friendly agricultural products. Korean J Org Agr 18:41-53
  10. Hong JS, Park HW, Park RS, Young CO, Seon MH. 2012. Advanced Korean Foods. Gyomoon Publishers, Paju, Gyeonggido. pp. 81, 85
  11. Jaeger SR, Rossiter KL, Wismer WV, Harker FR. 2003. Consumerdriven product development in the kiwifruit industry. Food Qual Prefer 14:187-198 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00053-8
  12. Jeon KC, Kim EY, Jeon DC. 2013. Taste of Korean Cuisine Handing Down a Secret Method 100. pp 62, 292. Baeksan Publishing
  13. Jung CW, Hoe SW, Kim H. 2003. A study on the development strategies and measuring consumer's willingness to pay for the quality-certificated environmental-friendly products-Focused on rice, lettuce, and bean curd at Cheonan-city-. Korean J Org Agr 11:24-43
  14. Jung SM. 2011. Development of labor saving cluster femaleflowered cucumber cultivar. Master Thesis. Chung-Ang Univ. Seoul. Korea
  15. Kang SE. 2013. Four Season Everyday Sidedishes. pp 100-101, 116-117, 148-149, 150-151, 182-183. Naneunbook Publisher
  16. Kim JY. 2013. Basic Korean cooking. pp 66, 100, 104. Ukang Books
  17. Korea Agro-Fisheries and Food Trade Corporation. 2006. Distribution Survey-Consumption Survey-2006 The main vegetable consumption patterns. Available from http://www.kamis.co.kr/ [cited 2015 December 10]
  18. Korea Rural Economic Institute. 2013. Environment-friendly agricultural produces: Action for cease of low-pesticide certification. Available from http://library.krei.re.kr/dl_images/001/036/P172.pdf [cited 2015 December 10]
  19. Lawless HT, Heymann H. 2010. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed. Chap.14, pp. 325-330. Springer Science and Business Media
  20. Lee HY. 2011. Fifty Million People's Dishes. pp 100, 102, 112. Kyunghyangmedia
  21. Lee JH, Lee AJ. 2006. Delicious Korean Foods. pp.188-189. Hyoil Publisher
  22. Lee JY, Jang BC, Sung JK, Lee SY, Kim RY, Lee YJ, Park YH, Kang SS, Hyun BK. 2012. Evaluation of soil and fertilizer management techniques applied by farmers in forcing and semi-forcing cucumber cultivation facilities. Korean Soc Soil Sci Fertilis 45:983-991 https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2012.45.6.983
  23. Lee JY, Sung JK, Lee SY, Jang BC, Kim RY, Kang SS. 2011. Macro and micro nutrient contents in leaves of greenhousegrown cucumber by growth stages. Korean Soc Soil Sci Fertilis 44:215-220 https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2011.44.2.215
  24. Nam TS. 2002. Effect of growth and development of hydroponically grown cucumber plants by changed nutrient solution concentration. Master Thesis. Chonnam National Univ. Gwangju. Korea
  25. National Institute of Agricultural Sciences and Technology. 2005. Purchasing behavior survey report of consumers of environmentally friendly agricultural produces. pp 16-22. National Institute of Agricultural Sciences and Technology,Rural Resources Development Institute. Suwon, Korea
  26. Park JI. 2013. Kimchi & Jangajji. pp 76, 92, 114, 116, 146, 186, 188, 190, 240, 242. Jihoon Publisher
  27. Park SW, Lee JW, Kim YC, Kim KY, Hong JH, Lee MR, Hong SJ. 2004. Relationship between physicochemical quality attributes and sensory evaluation during fruit maturation of cucumber. Kor J Hort Sci Technol 22:177-182
  28. Resurreccion AVA. 1998. Consumer Sensory Testing for Product Development. pp. 1-10.
  29. An Aspen Publication Rural Development Administration. 2015. Vegetable-Cucumber-Variety selection. Available from http://oneclick.rda.go.kr/ [cited 2015 December 10]
  30. Ryu JH, Rho JO. 2011. The consumption behavior and perceptions of environment-friendly agricultural products by university students in Korea. Korean J Food Nutr 24:101-110 https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2011.24.1.101
  31. Seo CN. 2002. Correlation between quality factors and sensory test and quality estimation of cucumber fruits at different ripening stages. Master thesis. Gangneung National Univ. Gangneung-si. Korea
  32. Statistics Korea. 2015. Environment-friendly agricultural produces production trend. Available from http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1292 [cited 2015 December 10]
  33. Yoon HS. 2011. Four season Gala Menu 303. pp 102, 133, 138, 155. After100years Publishing Co
  34. Zhao X, Chambers IV E, Matta Z, Loughin TM, Carey EE. 2007. Consumer sensory analysis of organically and conventionally grown vegetables. J Food Sci 72:456-460 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00509.x

피인용 문헌

  1. Eco-Physiological Properties of Open-Field Cucumbers Responded to Organic Liquid Fertilizers vol.12, pp.23, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239830
  2. 황토노각플러스 추출물의 항산화, 항염 및 항미생물 효능 vol.10, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.22156/cs4smb.2020.10.12.183