DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Fisheries Distribution Margin and Performance ; Focused on the case of Mackerel

수산물 유통마진과 유통성과 연구 -고등어 유통 사례를 중심으로 -

  • Jang, Young-Soo (Department of Marine and Fisheries Business and Economics, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Park, Key-Seop (KS SEAFOOD CO., LTD.) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Phil (Department of Marine and Fisheries Business and Economics, Pukyong National University)
  • 장영수 (부경대학교 해양수산경영학과) ;
  • 박기섭 (KS수산식품(주)) ;
  • 이정필 (부경대학교 해양수산경영학과)
  • Received : 2015.12.05
  • Accepted : 2015.12.14
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis on mackerel distribution process and price formation process, and investigation of price and margin between traditional markets and Large-scale discount store distribution channel. Through this, the study investigated distribution efficiency of each channel, and examined whether a difference of distribution efficiency leads to a difference of performance through the investigation of a difference of function and role between members of a wholesale market and vendor of Large scale discount store. The following are the results of this study. As a consequence of investigating supply and sum by distribution channel of mackerel, it appeared that mackerels shipped from port market are distributed into 9 consumption sites(Wholesale market, Large scale discount store, Institutional Food Service, etc.). In the comparison of distribution efficiency between traditional retail store and Large scale discount store 52.0% margin is formed in traditional retail store distribution channel and 43.1% margin is formed in Large scale discount store, and a distribution cost rate consists of 19.4% cost in a traditional retail store for fishery products and 18.1% cost in a Large-scale discount store. To analyze a difference of performance, the study examine a difference of role and function between vendor and Wholesale market company, wholesaler and middleman. Wholesale market company and middleman of wholesale market for consumer have slightly high or similar score in collection function, sorting function, evaluation function and financial function which are traditional and original. However, it was confirmed that vendor has a better score in other functions, that is, newly-demanded functions(ex : market frontier function, product development function, Integral Distribution Function, etc.).

Keywords

References

  1. Cooper, R. and Kaplan, R. S. (1988), "Measure costs right: make the right decisions," Harvard business review, 66 (5), 96-103.
  2. Jeon, C. G. (1998), "An Analysis on the Marketing Channels and Margin over Marine Products," Korean journal of food marketing economics, 15 (2), 141-158.
  3. Jang, Y. S. (2004), "Fisheries Marketing Management Effectiveness of Discount Store," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 35 (1), 169-191.
  4. Jang, Y. S. and Park. K. H. (2005), "A Study of Information system Effects on the Trust between Wholesale Market Company and Intermediary Wholesaler in SeaFood Market," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 36 (2), 1-24.
  5. Jang, Y. S. (2011) Seafood Marketing, PUKYONG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY PRESS.
  6. Kang, J. H. (2014), "Changes and Implications of the Fishery Products Distribution Structure in the Channels of Fisheries Marketing," Ocean policy research, 29 (1), 129-151
  7. Kang, J. H. (2014), "A Study on Problems and Solutions for Trading System of Fishery Products Wholesale Market in Korea," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 45 (1), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2014.45.1.079
  8. Lee, K. W. (2000), "A Study on Improving the Fisheries Products Distribution Structure", Korean journal of food marketing economics, 31 (1), 33-54.
  9. Lee, N. S. (2006), "A Study on the Distribution and Consumption Structure of Aquacultural Flatfish," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 37 (2), 61-83.

Cited by

  1. Assessment of Quality Changes in Mackerel Scomber japonicus During Refrigerated Storage: Development of a Freshness Indicator vol.49, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2016.0731