A Clinical Analysis of Patients Who Visited Emergency Department due to Chemical Incident Occurred at Industrial Place: A Retrospective Study

산업장 화학 사고로 응급실에 내원한 환자의 임상적 고찰: 일개병원의 후향적 연구

  • Shin, Hee Jun (Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital) ;
  • Oh, Se Kwang (Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital) ;
  • Yoo, Byeong Dai (Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital) ;
  • Jun, Duck Ho (Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Dong Ha (Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital) ;
  • Woo, Kuck Hyeun (Environmental Health Center, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital) ;
  • Yoon, Seong Yong (Environmental Health Center, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Sung Yong (Environmental Health Center, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital)
  • 신희준 (순천향대학교 구미병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 오세광 (순천향대학교 구미병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 유병대 (순천향대학교 구미병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 전덕호 (순천향대학교 구미병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 이동하 (순천향대학교 구미병원 응급의학과) ;
  • 우극현 (순천향대학교 구미병원 환경보건센터) ;
  • 윤성용 (순천향대학교 구미병원 환경보건센터) ;
  • 최성용 (순천향대학교 구미병원 환경보건센터)
  • Received : 2015.11.02
  • Accepted : 2015.12.10
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to understand what kinds of chemical substances have been used annually and to investigate incidents that occurred due to chemical hazard release and to analyze statistically clinically chemical injury patients who visited one regional emergency medical center in Gumi city with documented references review. Methods: Annual chemical waste emission quantity (Kg/Year) (Cwep) was reproduced using national web site data governed by the Ministry of Environment and 5 years (from 1 .Jan. 2010 to 31. Dec. 2014) of medical records of chemical injury patients who visited our emergency department were reviewed retrospectively. By applying exclusion criteria, 446 patients of 460 patients were selected. Results: Dichloromethane, Toluene, Trichloroethylene, and Xylene were always included within Top 5 of Cweq. Six cases of chemical incidents were reported and in 3 of 6 cases involving Hydrogen fluoride were included during the study period. Male gender and twenties were the most prevalent group. Injury evoking chemicals were Hydrogen fluoride, unknown, complex chemicals (over 2 substances) in sequence. The most frequent site of wounds and injuries was the respiratory tract. Gas among status, intoxication among diagnosis, and discharge among disposition was most numerous in each group. Conclusion: There have been no uniform clinical protocols for chemical wounds and injuries due to various kinds of chemicophysical properties and ignorance of antidotes. Therefore conduct of a multicenter cohort study and experiments for ruling out chemicals according to chemicophysical priority as well as development of antidotes and clinical protocols for chemical injury patients is needed.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Wyke, A. Pena-Fernandez, N. Brooke, R. Duarte-Davidson. The importance of evaluating the physicochemical and toxicological properties of a contaminant for remediating environments affected by chemical incidents. Environ Int 2014;72:109-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.05.002
  2. Chemical Abstract Service. CAS Registry 2015; Available from: http://www.cas.org/content/chemical-substances. [cited 2015 13. Oct].
  3. . Available from: http://www.who.int/ipcs/about_ipcs/activity_report_2014.pdf?ua=1. [cited 2015 13. Oct].
  4. Gumi City home page.; Available from: http://www.gumi.go.kr/pages/sub.jsp?menuIdx=129. [cited 2015 13. Oct].
  5. Chemistry Safety Clearing-house. CSC Registry from 2010 to 2015. Available from: http://csc.me.go.kr/accident/accidentInfoPList.do. [cited 2015 13. Oct].
  6. Wang Xingang, Zhang Yuanhai, Ni Liangfang, You Chuanganga, Ye Chunjiang, Jiang Ruiming et al. A review of treatment strategies for hydrofluoric acid burns: current status and future prospects. Burns 2014;40:1447-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.04.009
  7. Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers 2015. Available from: http://ncis.nier.go.kr/prtr/index.do. [cited 2015 13.Oct].
  8. Jin, Chae. A study on the improvement of the disaster response system for hazardous materials accidents. Korean Public Administration Review 2015;49:473-506. https://doi.org/10.18333/KPAR.49.2.473
  9. Pesatori AC, Consonni D, Bachetti S, Zocchetti C, Bonzini M, Baccarelli A et al. Short- and long-term morbidity and mortality in the population exposed to dioxin after the "Seveso accident". Ind Health 2003;41:127-38. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.41.127
  10. Le Floch S, F.M., Slangen P, Aprin L. Environmental parameter effects on the fate of chemical slick. Air Quality - Monitoring and Modeling, Sunil Kumar and Rakesh Kumar (Ed.), INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2012:59-78.
  11. Anderson, A.R. and J. Wu. Top five industries resulting in injuries from acute chemical incidents-Hazardous Substance Emergency Events Surveillance, nine states, 1999-2008. MMWR Surveill Summ, 2015;64:47-53.
  12. Hunault CC, Boerleider RZ, Hof BG, Kliest JJ, Meijer M, Nijhuis NJ et al. Review of acute chemical incidents as a first step in evaluating the usefulness of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in such incidents. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2014;52:121-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2013.878866
  13. C.P. Lin, H.K. Chang, Y.M. Chang, S.W. Chen, C.M. Shu. Emergency response study for chemical releases in the high-tech industry in Taiwan-A semiconductor plant example. Process Saf. Environ 2009;87:353-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2009.07.005
  14. Posthuma L, Wahlstrom E, Nijenhuis R, Dijkens C, de Zwart D, van de Meent D et al. The Flash Environmental Assessment Tool: worldwide first aid for chemical accidents response, pro action, prevention and preparedness. Environ Int 2014;72:140-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.018
  15. Palao R, Monge I, Ruiz M, Barret JP. Chemical burns: pathophysiology and treatment. Burns 2010;36:295-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2009.07.009
  16. Moore K. Hot Topics: Chemical Burns in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Nurs 2015;41:364-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2015.04.017
  17. Jelenko 3rd C. Chemicals that "burn". J Trauma 1974;14:65-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-197401000-00009
  18. Robinson EP, Chhabra AB. Hand chemical burns. J Hand Surg Am 2015;40:605-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.07.056
  19. You K, Yang HT, Kym D, Yoon J, HaejunYim, Cho YS et al. Inhalation injury in burn patients: establishing the link between diagnosis and prognosis. Burns; 2014:40:1470-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.09.015
  20. Tan T, Wong DS. Chemical burns revisited: What is the most appropriate method of decontamination?. Burns 2015;41:761-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.10.004
  21. Wang X, Zhang Y, Ni L, You C, Ye C, Jiang R et al. A review of treatment strategies for hydrofluoric acid burns: current status and future prospects. Burns. 2014;40:1447-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.04.009
  22. Siegel DC, Heard JM. Intra-arterial calcium infusion for hydrofluoric acid burns. Aviat Space Environ Med 1992;63:206-11.
  23. Seyb ST NL, Botens S, Mani MM. A study to determine the efficacy of treatments for hydrofluoric acid burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995;16:253-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-199505000-00006
  24. Lin TM TC, Lin SD, Lai CS. Continuous intra-arterial infusion therapy in hydrofluoric acid burns. J Occup Environ Med 2000;42:892-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200009000-00008
  25. van Zundert A, Helmstadter A, Goerig M, Mortier E. Centennial of intravenous regional anesthesia. Bier's Block (1908-2008). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008;33:483-9.
  26. Heny JA, Hla KK. Intravenous regional calcium gluconate infusion for hydrofluoric acid burns. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1992;30:203-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/15563659209038631