The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of different veneering techniques on the fracture strength of metal and zirconia frameworks

  • Turk, Ayse Gozde (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege) ;
  • Ulusoy, Mubin (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege) ;
  • Yuce, Mert (Private practice) ;
  • Akin, Hakan (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University)
  • Received : 2015.05.14
  • Accepted : 2015.10.20
  • Published : 2015.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. To determine whether the fracture strengths and failure types differed between metal and zirconia frameworks veneered with pressable or layering ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A phantom molar tooth was prepared and duplicated in 40 cobalt-chromium abutments. Twenty metal (IPS d.SIGN 15, Ivoclar, Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and 20 zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar) frameworks were fabricated on the abutments. Each framework group was randomly divided into 2 subgroups according to the veneering material: pressable and layering ceramics (n=10). Forty molar crowns were fabricated, cemented onto the corresponding abutments and then thermocycled ($5-55^{\circ}C$, 10,000 cycles). A load was applied in a universal testing machine until a fracture occurred on the crowns. In addition, failure types were examined using a stereomicroscope. Fracture load data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS. The highest strength value was seen in metal-pressable (MP) group, whereas zirconia-pressable (ZP) group exhibited the lowest one. Moreover, group MP showed significantly higher fracture loads than group ZP (P=.015) and zirconia-layering (ZL) (P=.038) group. No significant difference in fracture strength was detected between groups MP and ML, and groups ZP and ZL (P>.05). Predominant fracture types were cohesive for metal groups and adhesive for zirconia groups. CONCLUSION. Fracture strength of a restoration with a metal or a zirconia framework was independent of the veneering techniques. However, the pressing technique over metal frameworks resisted significantly higher fracture loads than zirconia frameworks.

Keywords

References

  1. Guess PC, Kulis A, Witkowski S, Wolkewitz M, Zhang Y, Strub JR. Shear bond strengths between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics and their susceptibility to thermocycling. Dent Mater 2008;24:1556-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.028
  2. Akin GE, Kaval ME, Turk T, Akin H. Surface roughness and bond strength of zirconia posts to a resin cement after various surface pretreatments. Photomed Laser Surg 2015;33:246-51. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3861
  3. Akin H, Ozkurt Z, Kirmali O, Kazazoglu E, Ozdemir AK. Shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic after aluminum oxide sandblasting and various laser treatments. Photomed Laser Surg 2011;29:797-802. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2011.3039
  4. Kirmali O, Akin H, Ozdemir AK. Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia core after different surface treatments. Photomed Laser Surg 2013;31:261-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2013.3487
  5. Zhang Y, Kim JW. Graded structures for damage resistant and aesthetic all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2009;25:781-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.002
  6. Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J 2011;56:77-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01298.x
  7. Macedo VC, Anami LC, de Melo RM, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Effect of the layering technique on bond strength and cohesive resistance of a porcelain-zirconia system. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:57-62.
  8. Ishibe M, Raigrodski AJ, Flinn BD, Chung KH, Spiekerman C, Winter RR. Shear bond strengths of pressed and layered veneering ceramics to high-noble alloy and zirconia cores. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60090-5
  9. Choi JE, Waddell JN, Torr B, Swain MV. Pressed ceramics onto zirconia. Part 1: Comparison of crystalline phases present, adhesion to a zirconia system and flexural strength. Dent Mater 2011;27:1204-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.006
  10. Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Roos M, Trottmann A, Sailer I, Hammerle CH. Load-bearing capacity and failure types of anterior zirconia crowns veneered with overpressing and layering techniques. Dent Mater 2011;27:1045-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.006
  11. Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Guess PC, Thompson VP, Silva NR. Fatigue and damage accumulation of veneer porcelain pressed on Y-TZP. J Dent 2010;38:318-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.12.004
  12. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:984-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.013
  13. Ritter JE. Predicting lifetimes of materials and material structures. Dent Mater 1995;11:142-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80050-6
  14. Baldassarri M, Zhang Y, Thompson VP, Rekow ED, Stappert CF. Reliability and failure modes of implant-supported zirconium-oxide fixed dental prostheses related to veneering techniques. J Dent 2011;39:489-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.006
  15. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings-a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2009;25:121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.019
  16. Christensen RP, Ploeger BJ. A clinical comparison of zirconia, metal and alumina fixed-prosthesis frameworks veneered with layered or pressed ceramic: a three-year report. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:1317-29. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0076
  17. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater 2006;22:857-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.014
  18. Eisenburger M, Mache T, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Fracture stability of anterior zirconia crowns with different core designs and veneered using the layering or the press-over technique. Eur J Oral Sci 2011;119:253-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00829.x
  19. Kanat-Erturk B, Comlekoglu EM, Dundar-Comlekoglu M, Ozcan M, Gungor MA. Effect of veneering methods on zirconia framework-veneer ceramic adhesion and fracture resistance of single crowns. J Prosthodont 2014 Oct 15.
  20. Choi YS, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS. In vitro evaluation of fracture strength of zirconia restoration veneered with various ceramic materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:162-9. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.162
  21. Nakamura K, Adolfsson E, Milleding P, Kanno T, Ortengren U. Influence of grain size and veneer firing process on the flexural strength of zirconia ceramics. Eur J Oral Sci 2012;120:249-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00958.x
  22. Fahmy NZ, Salah E. An in vitro assessment of a ceramicpressed-to-metal system as an alternative to conventional metal ceramic systems. J Prosthodont 2011;20:621-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00767.x
  23. Schweitzer DM, Goldstein GR, Ricci JL, Silva NR, Hittelman EL. Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal. J Prosthodont 2005;14:239-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00052.x
  24. Ortorp A, Kihl ML, Carlsson GE. A 3-year retrospective and clinical follow-up study of zirconia single crowns performed in a private practice. J Dent 2009;37:731-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.002
  25. Napankangas R, Raustia A. Twenty-year follow-up of metalceramic single crowns: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:307-11.
  26. Oilo M, Kvam K, Gjerdet NR. Simulation of clinical fractures for three different all-ceramic crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 2014;122:245-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12128
  27. Attia A, Kern M. Influence of cyclic loading and luting agents on the fracture load of two all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:551-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.002
  28. Joda T, Huber S, Burki A, Zysset P, Bragger U. Influence of Abutment Design on Stiffness, Strength, and Failure of Implant-Supported Monolithic Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) Crowns. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014 Mar 14.
  29. Chen C, Trindade FZ, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 2014;30:954-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.018
  30. Sundh A, Molin M, Sjogren G. Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing. Dent Mater 2005;21:476-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.013
  31. Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG. The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:462-7.
  32. Rosentritt M, Plein T, Kolbeck C, Behr M, Handel G. In vitro fracture force and marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns fixed on natural and artificial teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:387-91.

Cited by

  1. Effect of core design on fracture resistance of zirconia-lithium disilicate anterior bilayered crowns vol.12, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.4.181
  2. Effect of cementation and aging on the marginal fit of veneered and monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns vol.125, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.036
  3. Fracture Load of Metal, Zirconia and Polyetheretherketone Posterior CAD-CAM Milled Fixed Partial Denture Frameworks vol.14, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040959