Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society (한국지반환경공학회 논문집)

Korean Geo-Environmental Society (한국지반환경공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Behavior Analysis of Large-diameter Drilled Shaft by Design Methods in Deep Water Depth Composite Foundation

대수심 대형 복합기초에서 설계기법에 따른 대구경 현장타설말뚝의 거동 분석 연구

  • Han, Yushik (Department of Civil Engineering, Kyungsung University) ;
  • Choi, Yongkyu (Department of Civil Engineering, Kyungsung University)
  • Received : 2014.03.27
  • Accepted : 2014.09.16
  • Published : 2015.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the long span bridge construction, construction cost portion of large scale marine foundation is about 40% (KICTEP, 2007). In this study, designs for deep water depth large composite foundation of a super long span cable-stayed girder bridge of prototype were performed by three design methods (ASD, LRFD, Eurocode) and the behaviors of a large diameter drilled shaft were analyzed and the 3D numerical analysis was performed. As a result, the soft rock socket lengths in allowable stress design estimation method were the longest. The soft rock socket lengths estimated by the design approach 2 among Eurocode and the LRFD were similar. The longer the socket length socketed in the soft rock was, the smaller the axial force acting on a large-diameter drilled shaft head was and the smaller the settlement of drilled shaft was.

장대교량의 공사비에서 대형 해상기초가 차지하는 비중은 약 40% 수준이다(KICTEP, 2007). 본 연구에서는 가상의 초장대 사장교에서 대수심 대형 복합기초에 대하여 3가지 설계법(허용응력 설계, LRFD 설계, 유로코드 설계)으로 설계검토를 실시하였고, 3차원 유한요소 해석을 통하여 대구경 현장타설말뚝의 거동에 관한 연구를 수행하였다. 그 결과, 허용응력 설계에서 추정한 방법이 연암 소켓길이가 가장 길었다. LRFD와 유로코드 설계법 2에 의해 계산된 연암소켓 길이는 유사하였다. 대구경 현장타설말뚝의 연암소켓길이가 길어짐에 따라 대구경 현장타설말뚝 두부에 작용하는 축력은 작아졌으며 현장타설말뚝의 침하량도 작아졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrew Bond, Andrew Harris (2008), Decoding Eurocode 7, Taylor&Francis, pp. 155, 178.
  2. AASHTO (1998). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specification, AASHTO, Washington DC., pp. 10-64, 66, 91.
  3. AASHTO (2007), AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications 4th edition, AASHTO, Washington DC., pp. 3-37, 10-40-43.
  4. Canadian Geotechnical Society (2006), Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual 4th edition, Bitech Publishers, Vancouver, BC., pp. 296-298.
  5. EN1990 (2004), EN 1990 - EUROCODE : BASIS OF STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANNEX A2 : Application for bridges (Normative), EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPEENNE EUROPAISCHE NORM., pp. 6-22.
  6. EN1997 (2004), Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design - part 1 : General rules, BRITISH STANDARD, pp. 130-132, 164-165.
  7. Freudenthal, A. M. (1947), Safety of Structures. Transactions. ASCE, Vol. 112, pp. 125-159
  8. Goda, Y. (1973), "A New Method of Wave Pressure Calculation for the Design of Composite Breakwater", Report of the Port and Harbour Research Institute, Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 31-69 (in Japanese).
  9. KICTEP (2007), Super long span bridge R&D center : Pre-Planning study, Final Report, Korea Agency for infrastructure Technology, pp. 102, 190 (in Korean).
  10. Korean Geotechnical Society (2002), Deep foundation, Goomibook, pp. 595 (in Korean).
  11. Korean Geotechnical Society (2009), Structural foundation design criteria, Goomibook, pp. 320-322 (in Korean).
  12. Korea Highway Corporation (2002), Guidelines for design of drilled shafts in rock, pp. 6-7 (in Korean).
  13. Korean Society of Civil Engineers & Korea Bridge Design Engineering Research Center (2008), Highway bridge design criteria, kimoondang, pp. 41 (in Korean).
  14. Korean Society of Civil Engineers (2012), Highway bridge design criteria (limit state design), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport., pp. 3-7-10 (in Korean).
  15. Midas GTS (2011a), Getting Started, Midas Information Technology Co., Ltd, pp. 1-104 (in Korean).
  16. Midas GTS (2011b), Analysis reference, Midas Information Technology Co., Ltd., pp. 1-300 (in Korean).
  17. O'Neill, M. W. and L. C. Reese (1999). Drilled shafts: Construction Procedures and Design Methods, FHWA-IF-99-025, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. pp. A-22.
  18. Pugsley, A. (1955), Report on structural Safety. Structural Engineer, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 141-149.
  19. Seoyeong Engineering (2012), Prototype structural calculation document of cable-stayed girder bridge, Super long span bridge R&D center pp. 9-11, 293-315 (in Korean).