Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

  • 제58권4호
  • /
  • Pages.357-362
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2005-3711(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-7876(eISSN)
대한신경외과학회 (The Korean Neurosurgical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Spinopelvic Parameters and Paraspinal Muscle Degeneration on S1 Screw Loosening

  • Kim, Jin-Bum (Department of Neurosurgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Seung-Won (Department of Neurosurgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Young-Seok (Department of Neurosurgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Nam, Taek-Kyun (Department of Neurosurgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Yong-Sook (Department of Neurosurgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Baeg (Department of Neurosurgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2015.07.06
  • 심사 : 2015.10.12
  • 발행 : 2015.10.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective : To investigate risk factors for S1 screw loosening after lumbosacral fusion, including spinopelvic parameters and paraspinal muscles. Methods : We studied with 156 patients with degenerative lumbar disease who underwent lumbosacral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation including the level of L5-S1 between 2005 and 2012. The patients were divided into loosening and non-loosening groups. Screw loosening was defined as a halo sign larger than 1 mm around a screw. We checked cross sectional area of paraspinal muscles, mean signal intensity of the muscles on T2 weight MRI as a degree of fatty degeneration, spinopelvic parameters, bone mineral density, number of fusion level, and the characteristic of S1 screw. Results : Twenty seven patients showed S1 screw loosening, which is 24.4% of total. The mean duration for S1 screw loosening was $7.3{\pm}4.1$ months after surgery. Statistically significant risk factors were increased age, poor BMD, 3 or more fusion levels (p<0.05). Among spinopelvic parameters, a high pelvic incidence (p<0.01), a greater difference between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordotic angle preoperatively (p<0.01) and postoperatively (p<0.05). Smaller cross-sectional area and high T2 signal intensity in both multifidus and erector spinae muscles were also significant muscular risk factors (p<0.05). Small converging angle (p<0.001) and short intraosseous length (p<0.05) of S1 screw were significant screw related risk factors (p<0.05). Conclusion : In addition to well known risk factors, spinopelvic parameters and the degeneration of paraspinal muscles also showed significant effects on the S1 screw loosening.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL : The Galveston technique of pelvic fixation with L-rod instrumentation of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9 : 388-394, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198405000-00011
  2. Balderston RA, Winter RB, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Lonstein JE : Fusion to the sacrum for nonparalytic scoliosis in the adult. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 11 : 824-829, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198610000-00017
  3. Barber JW, Boden SD, Ganey T, Hutton WC : Biomechanical study of lumbar pedicle screws : does convergence affect axial pullout strength? J Spinal Disord 11 : 215-220, 1998
  4. Bernhardt M, Swartz DE, Clothiaux PL, Crowell RR, White AA 3rd : Posterolateral lumbar and lumbosacral fusion with and without pedicle screw internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res (284) : 109-115, 1992
  5. Cho W, Mason JR, Smith JS, Shimer AL, Wilson AS, Shaffrey CI, et al. : Failure of lumbopelvic fixation after long construct fusions in patients with adult spinal deformity : clinical and radiographic risk factors : clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19 : 445-453, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.6.SPINE121129
  6. Dakhil-Jerew F, Jadeja H, Cohen A, Shepperd JA : Inter-observer reliability of detecting Dynesys pedicle screw using plain X-rays : a study on 50 post-operative patients. Eur Spine J 18 : 1486-1493, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1071-0
  7. Dekutoski MB, Schendel MJ, Ogilvie JW, Olsewski JM, Wallace LJ, Lewis JL : Comparison of in vivo and in vitro adjacent segment motion after lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 : 1745-1751, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199408000-00015
  8. Devlin VJ, Boachie-Adjei O, Bradford DS, Ogilvie JW, Transfeldt EE : Treatment of adult spinal deformity with fusion to the sacrum using CD instrumentation. J Spinal Disord 4 : 1-14, 1991
  9. Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, Smith JA, Hu SS, Bradford DS : Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity : luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 776-786, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200204010-00017
  10. Finger T, Bayerl S, Onken J, Czabanka M, Woitzik J, Vajkoczy P : Sacropelvic fixation versus fusion to the sacrum for spondylodesis in multilevel degenerative spine disease. Eur Spine J 23 : 1013-1020, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3165-6
  11. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC : Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre-and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res (304) : 78-83, 1994
  12. Herkowitz HN : Lumbar spinal stenosis : indications for arthrodesis and spinal instrumentation. Instr Course Lect 43 : 425-433, 1994
  13. Huang Y, Majumdar S, Genant HK, Chan WP, Sharma KR, Yu P, et al. : Quantitative MR relaxometry study of muscle composition and function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Magn Reson Imaging 4 : 59-64, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880040113
  14. Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, Eck JC, Murphy RB, Covington LA : Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26 : 567-571, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200103010-00023
  15. Jorgensen MJ, Marras WS, Gupta P : Cross-sectional area of the lumbar back muscles as a function of torso flexion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 18 : 280-286, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00027-5
  16. Kim EH, Kim HJ : Long segment fusion to L5 vertebra and sacral vertebra in degenerative lumbar spine. J Korean Soc Spine Surg 9 : 216-222, 2002 https://doi.org/10.4184/jkss.2002.9.3.216
  17. Kim HK, Laor T, Horn PS, Racadio JM, Wong B, Dardzinski BJ : T2 mapping in Duchenne muscular dystrophy : distribution of disease activity and correlation with clinical assessments. Radiology 255 : 899-908, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091547
  18. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho KJ, Edwards CC 2nd, Rinella AS : Pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity following multisegmental instrumentation and arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 : 721-728, 2006 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00550
  19. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G : Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum : prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 2329-2336, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000238968.82799.d9
  20. Kostuik JP, Hall BB : Spinal fusions to the sacrum in adults with scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8 : 489-500, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198307000-00006
  21. Krag MH, Beynnon BD, Pope MH, Frymoyer JW, Haugh LD, Weaver DL : An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine. Design and testing. Clin Orthop Relat Res (203) : 75-98, 1986
  22. La Grone MO : Loss of lumbar lordosis. A complication of spinal fusion for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 19 : 383-393, 1988
  23. Lazennec JY, Ramare S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, et al. : Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion : relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9 : 47-55, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050008
  24. Lebwohl NH, Cunningham BW, Dmitriev A, Shimamoto N, Gooch L, Devlin V, et al. : Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation techniques in a calf spine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 2312-2320, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200211010-00003
  25. Lee CS, Chung SS, Choi SW, Yu JW, Sohn MS : Critical length of fusion requiring additional fixation to prevent nonunion of the lumbosacral junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 : E206-E211, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bfa518
  26. Lee JC, Cha JG, Kim Y, Kim YI, Shin BJ : Quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration in the patients with the degenerative lumbar flat back using a digital image analysis : comparison with the normal controls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33 : 318-325, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318162458f
  27. Lehman RA Jr, Kuklo TR, Belmont PJ Jr, Andersen RC, Polly DW Jr : Advantage of pedicle screw fixation directed into the apex of the sacral promontory over bicortical fixation : a biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 806-811, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200204150-00006
  28. Leong JC, Lu WW, Zheng Y, Zhu Q, Zhong S : Comparison of the strengths of lumbosacral fixation achieved with techniques using one and two triangulated sacral screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23 : 2289-2294, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199811010-00008
  29. Luk KD, Chen L, Lu WW : A stronger bicortical sacral pedicle screw fixation through the s1 endplate : an in vitro cyclic loading and pull-out force evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 525-529, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000154649.55589.bf
  30. McCarthy RE, Bruffett WL, McCullough FL : S rod fixation to the sacrum in patients with neuromuscular spinal deformities. Clin Orthop Relat Res (364) : 26-31, 1999
  31. McLachlin SD, Al Saleh K, Gurr KR, Bailey SI, Bailey CS, Dunning CE : Comparative assessment of sacral screw loosening augmented with PMMA versus a calcium triglyceride bone cement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36 : E699-E704, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fb73ea
  32. Mengiardi B, Schmid MR, Boos N, Pfirrmann CW, Brunner F, Elfering A, et al. : Fat content of lumbar paraspinal muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and in asymptomatic volunteers : quantification with MR spectroscopy. Radiology 240 : 786-792, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2403050820
  33. Moore DC, Maitra RS, Farjo LA, Graziano GP, Goldstein SA : Restoration of pedicle screw fixation with an in situ setting calcium phosphate cement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22 : 1696-1705, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199708010-00003
  34. Pihlajamaki H, Myllynen P, Bostman O : Complications of transpedicular lumbosacral fixation for non-traumatic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 : 183-189, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.79B2.7224
  35. Rechtine GR, Sutterlin CE, Wood GW, Boyd RJ, Mansfield FL : The efficacy of pedicle screw/plate fixation on lumbar/lumbosacral autogenous bone graft fusion in adult patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 9 : 382-391, 1996
  36. Renner SM, Lim TH, Kim WJ, Katolik L, An HS, Andersson GB : Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29 : E212-E216, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200406010-00020
  37. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C : Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res (203) : 7-17, 1986
  38. Ruland CM, McAfee PC, Warden KE, Cunningham BW : Triangulation of pedicular instrumentation. A biomechanical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16 (6 Suppl) : S270-S276, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199106001-00019
  39. Sanden B, Olerud C, Petren-Mallmin M, Johansson C, Larsson S : The significance of radiolucent zones surrounding pedicle screws. Definition of screw loosening in spinal instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 : 457-461, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14323
  40. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP : Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34 : 1828-1833, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a13c08
  41. Seo JB, Yoo JS, Jang HS, Kim JS : Correlation of clinical symptoms and function with fatty degeneration of infraspinatus in rotator cuff tear. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23 : 1481-1488, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2857-0
  42. Skinner R, Maybee J, Transfeldt E, Venter R, Chalmers W : Experimental pullout testing and comparison of variables in transpedicular screw fixation. A biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15 : 195-201, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199003000-00007
  43. Soini J, Laine T, Pohjolainen T, Hurri H, Alaranta H : Spondylodesis augmented by transpedicular fixation in the treatment of olisthetic and degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res (297) : 111-116, 1993
  44. Winter RB, Pinto WC : Pelvic obliquity. Its causes and its treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 11 : 225-234, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198604000-00008
  45. Wu JC, Huang WC, Tsai HW, Ko CC, Wu CL, Tu TH, et al. : Pedicle screw loosening in dynamic stabilization : incidence, risk, and outcome in 126 patients. Neurosurg Focus 31 : E9, 2011
  46. Xu H, Tang H, Guan X, Jiang F, Xu N, Ju W, et al. : Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis. Neurosurgery 72 (1 Suppl Operative) : 21-26, 2013
  47. Yan DL, Pei FX, Li J, Soo CL : Comparative study of PILF and TLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 17 : 1311-1316, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0739-1
  48. Zahi R, Vialle R, Abelin K, Mary P, Khouri N, Damsin JP : Spinopelvic fixation with iliosacral screws in neuromuscular spinal deformities : results in a prospective cohort of 62 patients. Childs Nerv Syst 26 : 81-86, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-0966-8
  49. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH, Thomas JC, Holland WR, Field BT, et al. : A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res (203) : 99-112, 1986

피인용 문헌

  1. Percutaneous Image-Guided Screw Fixation of Bone Lesions in Cancer Patients: Double-Centre Analysis of Outcomes including Local Evolution of the Treated Focus vol.39, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-016-1389-z
  2. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Iliac Screw Loosening After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery vol.42, pp.17, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002047
  3. Regional Hounsfield unit measurement of screw trajectory for predicting pedicle screw fixation using cortical bone trajectory: a retrospective cohort study vol.160, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3424-5
  4. Pedicle Screws Loosening in Patients With Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine: Potential Risk Factors and Relative Contribution vol.9, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218772302
  5. Multi-Rod Constructs Can Increase the Incidence of Iliac Screw Loosening after Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity vol.13, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0209
  6. The Effect of Paraspinal Muscle Degeneration on Distal Pedicle Screw Loosening Following Corrective Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis vol.45, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000003336
  7. Level-based analysis of screw loosening with cortical bone trajectory screws in patients with lumbar degenerative disease vol.99, pp.40, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000022186
  8. The Prevalence and Risk Factors for S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Loosening with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up vol.14, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0127
  9. Hounsfield units value is a better predictor of pedicle screw loosening than the T-score of DXA in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases vol.29, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06386-8
  10. Computed tomography Hounsfield unit-based prediction of pedicle screw loosening after surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease vol.32, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.11.spine19868
  11. Computed tomography Hounsfield unit-based prediction of pedicle screw loosening after surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease vol.32, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.11.spine19868
  12. Assessment of the association between paraspinal muscle degeneration and quality of life in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8682
  13. Potential contribution of pedicle screw design to loosening rate in patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: An observational study vol.12, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i5.310
  14. Caudad Insertion of Pedicle Screws Facilitates Interbody Distraction During Spondylolisthetic Vertebrae Restoration: A Retrospective Study vol.10, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00315-3
  15. Second sacral sacralalar‐iliac (S2AI) screw placement in adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients: an imaging study vol.21, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01139-w
  16. Risk Factors Affecting Cage Retropulsion into the Spinal Canal Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Association with Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis vol.15, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0434