DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sharing Innovation's Benefits

  • Received : 2015.08.28
  • Accepted : 2015.09.25
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

WTR articles to date have addressed raising innovation capacity in lagging regions. We now move to the question of sharing the benefits of specific innovations, noting that one way to do this is to focus on a particular technology as a demonstration project within a capacity-building project. The word "sharing" implies mechanisms that go beyond simple buy-sell transactions. This paper catalogs a number of these mechanisms, which in fact include many well-known technology transfer techniques. The paper focuses in particular on two mechanisms, technology assessment and new institutions, the latter including three Korean institutions. A manager seeking to benefit from the several mechanisms currently must find them in as many different places. We therefore present the possible "roll-up" of sharing mechanisms as an opportunity in social entrepreneurship. We hope the paper will lead to an expanded list of sharing mechanisms, consideration of their feasibility in different regions, and ultimately a one-stop shop for managers seeking to benefit their own and other organizations by the sharing of innovations.

Keywords

References

  1. Gulbrandsen, M. (2011) "Research institutes as hybrid organizations: Central challenges to their legitimacy," Policy Sciences 44(3): 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-011-9128-4
  2. Mani, S., and Nelson, R. R. (eds.) (2013) TRIPS Compliance, National Patent Regimes, and Innovation, Elgar.
  3. Martin Kenney, Dan Breznitz and Michael Murphree (2013) "Coming back home after the sun rises: Returnee entrepreneurs and growth of high tech industries," Research Policy 42: 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.08.001
  4. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MTIE) (2011) Comprehensive Plan for Fostering Special R&D Zone II. available at: www.motie.go.kr/common/download.do?fid=bbs&bbs_ cd_n=5&bbs_seq_n=58434&fil (accessed on August 12, 2015) [in Korean]
  5. Oh, D.S., and Phillips, F. (2015) "Technology Assessment: A role for UNESCO and S&T Parks," WTA working paper, July 2015.
  6. Phillips, F. (2001) Market-Oriented Technology Management, Springer.
  7. Phillips, F. (2004) "Trading Down: The Intellectual Poverty of the New FTAs," Technological Forecasting & Social Change 71(8): 865-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.01.002
  8. Business Insider. http://www.businessinsider.com/ (June, 2015)
  9. BOOKS FOR AFRICA. www.booksforafrica.org
  10. Center for Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEI). https://ccei.creativekorea.or.kr/info/press.do (July 27, 2015)
  11. INNOPOLIS Foundation. http://www.innopolis.or.kr/(July 09,2015)
  12. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning. http://www.msip.go.kr/english/main/main.do (July 27, 2015)
  13. Science and Technology Policy Institute (STEPI). http://www.stepi.re.kr/ (July 2015)
  14. Daejeon Center for Creative Economy and Innovation. https://ccei.creativekorea.or.kr/daejeon/info/pr_info.do (July24,2015)
  15. World Technopolis Association (WTA). http://www.wtanet.org/main.html (July 11, 2015)

Cited by

  1. How Should Techno Parks Innovate to Support Start-ups and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Effectively in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution? vol.6, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr17a0829.16