DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding University Industry Technology Transfer: Relationship Management Approaches of Leading Universities in Europe And USA

  • Received : 2015.03.29
  • Accepted : 2015.05.19
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

The importance of university technology transfer has widely been brought to the center of attention over the last decades. Research and practice thereby often concentrate on issues related to patenting and licensing or entrepreneurship but abstract away from relationship- and network-focused initiatives. In this paper, we argue that efforts to systematically develop close, long-term collaboration partnerships - although complex and resource intensive - are likely to be more beneficial for both universities and industry in the long run. Drawing on data derived from interviews with technology transfer executives of 22 leading European and U.S. universities, we analyze and discuss well-established practices of network and relationship management and their possible impact on technology transfer success. Our findings indicate that dedicated relationship management approaches can yield a sustainable competitive advantage for universities. We thereby shift the focus away from transaction-orientation towards more forward-looking relationship-centric approaches and discuss their institutionalization in great detail.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, J. D. (1990) "Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth," Journal of Political Economy 98(4): 673-702. https://doi.org/10.1086/261702
  2. Ahuja, G. (2000) "Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study," Administrative Science Quarterly 45(3): 425-455. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105
  3. Anand, B. N., and Khanna, T. (2000) "Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances," Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<295::AID-SMJ91>3.0.CO;2-O
  4. Anderson, J. C., and Narus, J. A. (1990) "A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships," Journal of Marketing 54(1): 42-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252172
  5. Anderson, T. R., Daim, T. U., and Lavoie, F. F. (2007) "Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer," Technovation 27(5): 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.003
  6. Anselin, L., and Varga, A. (1997) "Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations," Journal of Urban Economics 42(3): 422-448. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1997.2032
  7. Artz, K. W., and Brush, T. H. (2000) "Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms: an examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 41(4): 337-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00080-3
  8. AUTM Survey (2007) U.S. Licensing Activity Survey 2007, Association of University Technology Managers. available at http://www.autm.net
  9. AUTM Survey (2009) U.S. Licensing Activity Survey 2009, Association of University Technology Managers. available at http://www.autm.net
  10. ASTP Survey (2009) ASTP Survey for Fiscal Year 2008, Association of European Science and Technology Transfer Professionals. available at http://www.astp.net
  11. Balconi, M., and Laboranti, A. (2006) "University-industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics," Research Policy 35(10): 1616-1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.018
  12. Barnes, T., Pashby, I., and Gibbons, A. (2002) "Effective University - Industry Interaction: A Multi-case Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects," European Management Journal 20(3): 272-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00044-0
  13. Beise, M., and Stahl, H. (1999) "Public research and industrial innovations in Germany," Research Policy 28(4): 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00126-7
  14. Belderbos, R., Carree, M., and Lokshin, B. (2004) "Cooperative R&D and firm performance," Research Policy 33(10): 1477-1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003
  15. Bercovitz, J., Jap, S. D., and Nickerson, J. A. (2006) "The Antecedents and Performance Implications of Cooperative Exchange Norms," Organization Science 17(6): 724-740. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0213
  16. Bielig, A., and Haase, H. (2004) "Patente aus Hochschulen: Die Intellectual Property Rights-Frage," Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftspolitik 53(2): 228-251.
  17. Boulding, W., Staelin, R., Ehret, M., and Wesley, J. J. (2005) "A Customer Relationship Management Roadmap: What is Known, Potential Pitfalls, and Where to Go," Journal of Marketing 69(4): 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.155
  18. Bozeman, B. (2000) "Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory," Research Policy 29(4-5): 627-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
  19. Brown, S. L., and Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) "Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions," Academy of Management Review 20(2): 343-378. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9507312922
  20. Bruneel, J., D'Este, P., and Salter, A. (2010) "Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration," Research Policy 39(7): 858-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006
  21. Capaldo, A. (2007) "Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability," Strategic Management Journal 28(6): 585-585. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.621
  22. Cassiman, B., and Veugelers, R. (2006) "In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition," Management Science 52(1): 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
  23. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., and Walsh, J. P. (2002) "Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D," Management Science 48(1): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
  24. Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R. R., Rosenberg, N., and Sampat, B. N. (2002) "How Do University Inventions Get into Practice?" Management Science 48(1): 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.61.14272
  25. Cook, K. S., and Emerson, R. M. (1978) "Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks," American Sociological Review 43(5): 721-739. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094546
  26. Corbin, J. M., Strauss, A. L., and Strauss, A. L. (2008) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.), Los Angeles Calif.: Sage Publications Inc.
  27. Crosby, Y. L., Evans, K. R., and Cowles, D. (1990) "Relationship Quality in Services Selling - An Interpersonal Influence Perspective," Journal of Marketing 54(3): 68-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251817
  28. Davenport, S., Davies, J., and Grimes, C. (1998) "Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference," Technovation 19(1): 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00083-2
  29. Debackere, K., and Veugelers, R. (2005) "The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links," Research Policy 34(3): 321-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003
  30. Decter, M., Bennett, D., and Leseure, M. (2007) "University to business technology transfer-UK and USA comparisons," Technovation 27(3): 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.02.001
  31. Der-Juinn, H., and Chao-Chih, H. (2005) "How to Improve Efficiency in Transfer of Scientific Knowledge from University to Firms: The Case of Universities in Taiwan," Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 7(2): 187-190.
  32. Di Gregorio, D., and Shane, S. (2003) "Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?" Research Policy 32(2): 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5
  33. Doney, P. M., and Cannon, J. P. (1997) "An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships," Journal of Marketing 61(2): 35-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251829
  34. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., and Oh, S. (1987) "Developing Buyer- Seller Relationships," Journal of Marketing 61(2): 11-28.
  35. Dyer, J. H., and Singh, H. (1998) "The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage," Academy of Management Review 23(4): 660-679. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255632
  36. Dyer, J. H., Kale, P., and Singh, H. (2001) "How to make strategic alliances work," MIT Sloan Management Review 42(4): 37-43.
  37. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) "Building Theories from Case Study Research," Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385
  38. Etzkowitz, H., and Webster, A. (2000) "The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm," Research Policy 29(2): 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
  39. Feldman, M., Feller, I., Bercovitz, J., and Burton, R. (2002) "Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities," Management Science 48(1): 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.105.14276
  40. Feller, I., Ailes Catherine, P., and Roessner, J. D. (2002) "Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: Evidence from engineering research centers," Research Policy 31(3): 457-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00119-6
  41. Floricel, S., and Ibanescu, M. (2008) "Using R&D portfolio management to deal with dynamic risk," R&D Management 38(5): 452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00535.x
  42. Fryxell, G. E., Dooley, R. S., and Vryza, M. (2002) "After the ink dries: The interaction of trust and control in US-based international joint ventures," Journal of Management Studies 39(6): 865-886. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00315
  43. Gibb, A. A. (1996) "Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management: Can We Afford to Neglect Them in the Twenty- first Century Business School," British Journal of Management 7(4): 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00121.x
  44. Granovetter, M. (1973) "Strength of weak ties," American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
  45. Gummesson, E. (2002) "Relationship Marketing in the New Economy," Journal of Relationship Marketing 1(1): 37-58. https://doi.org/10.1300/J366v01n01_04
  46. Hagedoorn, J. (2002) "Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960," Research Policy, 31(4): 477-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00120-2
  47. Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., and Vonortas, N. S. (2000) "Research partnerships," Research Policy, 29(4/5): 567-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6
  48. Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., and Scott, J. T. (2001) "Barriers Inhibiting Industry from Partnering with Universities: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program," Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1-2): 87-87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007888312792
  49. Harmon, B., Ardishvili, A., Cardozo, R., Elder, T., Leuthold, J., Parshall, J., Raghian, M., and Smith, D. (1997) "Mapping the university technology transfer process," Journal of Business Venturing 12(6): 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00064-X
  50. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., and Gremler, D. D. (2002) "Understanding Relationship Marketing Outcomes," Journal of Service Research 4(3): 230-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670502004003006
  51. Jaffe, A. B. (1989) "Real Effects of Academic Research," American Economic Review 79(5): 957-970.
  52. Jensen, R. A., Thursby, J. G., and Thursby, M. C. (2003) "Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: "The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with"," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9): 1271-1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00083-3
  53. Johannisson, B., Landstrom, H., and Rosenberg, J. (1998) "University training for entrepreneurship - An action frame of reference," European Journal of Engineering Education 23(4): 477-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799808923526
  54. Jones-Evans, D., Klofsten, M., Andersson, E., and Pandya, D. (1999) "Creating a bridge between university and industry in small European countries: The role of the Industrial Liaison Office," R&D Management 29(1): 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00116
  55. Kale, P., and Singh, H. (2009) "Managing Strategic Alliances: What Do We Know Now, and Where Do We Go From Here?" Academy of Management Perspectives 23(3): 45-62. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2009.43479263
  56. Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., and Singh, H. (2002) "Alliance Capability, Stock Market Response, and Long-Term Alliance Success: The Role of the Alliance Function," Strategic Management Journal 23(8): 747-767. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.248
  57. Kale, P., Dyer, J., and Singh, H. (2001) "Value creation and success in strategic alliances: Alliancing skills and the role of alliance structure and systems," European Management Journal 19(5): 463-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(01)00062-7
  58. Kale, P., Singh, H., and Perlmutter, H. (2000) "Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital," Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::AID-SMJ95>3.0.CO;2-Y
  59. Koza, M. P., and Lewin, A. Y. (1998) "The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances," Organization Science 9(3): 255-264. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.3.255
  60. Lambe, C. J., Spekman, R. E., and Hunt, S. D. (2002) "Alliance Competence, Resources, and Alliance Success: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Initial Test," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30(2): 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/03079459994399
  61. Lavie, D. (2006) "The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource based view," Academy of Management Review 31(3): 638-658. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.21318922
  62. Levin, D. Z., and Cross, R. (2004) "The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer," Management Science 50(11): 1477-1490. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136
  63. Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., and Bozeman, B. (2007) "An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in in-formal university technology transfer," Industrial & Corporate Change 16(4): 641-656. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm020
  64. Lunnan, R., and Haugland, S. A. (2008) "Predicting and measuring alliance performance: a multidimensional analysis," Strategic Management Journa, 29(5): 545-556. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.660
  65. Mansfield, E. (1998) "Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings," Research Policy 26(7-8): 773-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00043-7
  66. March, J. G., and Sutton, R. I. (1997) "Organizational performance as a dependent variable," Organization Science 8(6): 698-706. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.6.698
  67. Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H., Balkin, D. B., and Gianiodis, P. T. (2005) "Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer," Journal of Business Venturing 20(2): 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003
  68. McAdam, R., Keogh, W., Galbraith, B., and Laurie, D. (2005) "Defining and improving technology transfer business and management processes in university innovation centers," Technovation 25(12): 1418-1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.08.002
  69. McMillan, G. S., and Narin, F. (2000) "An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology," Research Policy 29(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00030-X
  70. Meyer-Krahmer, F., and Schmoch, U. (1998) "Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields," Research Policy 27(8): 835-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00094-8
  71. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis : an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  72. Millman, T. F. (1996) "Global key account management and systems selling: Project Marketing and Systems Selling," International Business Review 5(6): 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(96)00031-5
  73. Mohr, J., and Spekman, R. (1994) "Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques," Strategic Management Journal, 15(2): 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150205
  74. Morgan, R. M., and Hunt, S. D. (1994) "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing," Journal of Marketing 58(3): 20-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252308
  75. O'Connor, G. C. (2008) "Major Innovation as a Dynamic Capability: A Systems Approach," Journal of Product Innovation Management 25(4): 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00304.x
  76. Padula, G. (2008) "Enhancing the innovation performance of firms by balancing cohesiveness and bridging ties," Long Range Planning 41(4): 395-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.01.004
  77. Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. R., Grewal, D., and Evans, K. R. (2006) "Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis," Journal of Marketing, 70(4): 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.136
  78. Pardo, C. (1999) "Key account management in the business- to-business field: a French overview," The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 14(4): 276-297. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858629910279880
  79. Park, H. W., and Leydesdorff, L. (2010) "Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives," Research Policy 39(5): 640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.009
  80. Park S.H. and Ungson G.R. (2001) "Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure," Organization Scienc, 12: 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.37.10118
  81. Payne, A., and Frow, P. (2005) "A Strategic Framework for Customer Relationship Management: Journal of Marketing," Journal of Marketing 69(4): 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.167
  82. Perkmann, M., and Walsh, K. (2007) "University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda," International Journal of Management Reviews 9(4): 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
  83. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) "Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology," Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1): 116-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988
  84. Provan, K. G., Fish, A., and Sydow, J. (2007) "Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks," Journal of Management 33(3): 479-516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307302554
  85. Reynolds, K. E., and Beatty, S. E. (1999) "Customer benefits and company consequences of customer-salesperson relationships in retailing," Journal of Retailing 75(1): 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80002-5
  86. Rogers, E. M., Takegami, S., and Yin, J. (2001) "Lessons learned about technology transfer," Technovation 21(4): 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00039-0
  87. Rosenberg, N., and Nelson, R. R. (1994) "American universities and technical advance in industry," Research Policy 23(3): 323-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90042-6
  88. Rost, K. (2011) "The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation," Research Policy 40(4): 588-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.12.001
  89. Rothaermel, F. T., and Deeds, D. L. (2004) "Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development," Strategic Management Journal 25(3): 201-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.376
  90. Rothaermel, F., and Deeds, D. (2006) "Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures," Journal of Business Venturing 21(4): 429-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.006
  91. Ryals, L., and Rogers, B. (2007) "Key account planning: benefits, barriers and best practice," Journal of Strategic Marketing, 15(2-3): 209-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09652540701320894
  92. Saez, C. B., Marco, T. G., and Arribas, E. H. (2002) "Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: an empirical study of Spanish firms," R&D Management 32(4): 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00264
  93. Sampat, B. N. (2006) "Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh- Dole," Research Policy 35(6): 772-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.009
  94. Santoro, M. D., and Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001) "Relationship Dynamics between University Research Centers and Industrial Firms: Their Impact on Technology Transfer Activities," Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1-2): 163-163. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007804816426
  95. Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., and Gassler, H. (2001) "Interactive Relations between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria," Journal of Technology Transfer 26(3): 255-255. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011110207885
  96. Schmoch, U., Licht, G., and Reinhard, M. (2000) Wissens- und Technologietransfer in Deutschland, Stuttgart: IRB Verlag.
  97. Schreiner, M., Prashant, K., and Daniel, C. (2009) "What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success?" Strategic Management Journal 30(13): 1395-1395. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.790
  98. Sheth, J., and Parvatiyar, A. (1995) "Relationship marketing in consumer markets: Antecedents and consequences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23(4): 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300405
  99. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., and Link, A. (2003) "Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study," Research Policy 32(1): 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
  100. Srinivasan, R., and Moorman, C. (2005) "Strategic Firm Commitments and Rewards for Customer Relationship Management in Online Retailing," Journal of Marketing 69(4): 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.193
  101. Teece, D. J. (1977) "Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How," Economic Journal 87(346): 242-261. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232084
  102. Thursby, J. G., and Thursby, M. C. (2002) "Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing," Management Science 48(1): 90-104. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271
  103. Tiwana, A. (2008) "Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity," Strategic Management Journal 29(3): 251. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.666
  104. Todtling, F., Lehner, P., and Kaufmann, A. (2008) "Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions?" Technovation 29(1):59-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.002
  105. Tomkins, C. (2001) "Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks," Accounting, Organizations and Society 26(2): 161-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00018-0
  106. Uzzi, B. (1997) "Social structure and competition in interfirm networks," Administrative Science Quarterly 42(2): 417-418. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393931
  107. Weston, C., Gandell, T., Beauchamp, J., McAlpine, L., Wiseman, C., and Beauchamp, C. (2001) "Analyzing Interview Data: The Development and Evolution of a Coding System," Qualitative Sociology 24(3): 381-400. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010690908200
  108. Wong, V., Shaw, V., and Sher, P. J. (1999) "Intra-Firm Learning in Technology Transfer: A Study of Taiwanese Information Technology Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management 3(4): 427-459. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919699000219
  109. Wright, R. (2008) "How to Get the Most from University Relationships," MIT Sloan Management Review 49(3): 75-80.
  110. Xu, Z., Parry, M. E., and Song, M. (2011) "The Impact of Technology Transfer Office Characteristics on University Invention Disclosure," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 58(2): 212-227. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2048915
  111. Yin, R. K. (2009) Case study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.), Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage Publications.
  112. Youtie, J., Libaers, D., and Bozeman, B. (2006) "Institutionalization of university research centers: The case of the National Cooperative Program in Infertility Research," Technovation 26(9): 1055-1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.11.007

Cited by

  1. A conical-helix model of technology transfer and public-private partnerships for technological development in Brazilian public health vol.53, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.01.006