Computers and Concrete

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic performance of skewed highway bridges using analytical fragility function methodology

  • Bayat, M. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Tarbiat Modares University) ;
  • Daneshjoo, F. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Tarbiat Modares University)
  • Received : 2015.10.23
  • Accepted : 2015.11.06
  • Published : 2015.11.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the seismic performance of skewed highway bridges has been assessed by using fragility function methodology. Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) has been used to prepare complete information about the different damage states of a 30 degree skewed highway bridge. A three dimensional model of a skewed highway bridge is presented and incremental dynamic analysis has been applied. The details of the full nonlinear procedures have also been presented. Different spectral intensity measures are studied and the effects of the period on the fragility curves are shown in different figures. The efficiency, practicality and proficiency of these different spectral intensity measures are compared. A suite of 20 earthquake ground motions are considered for nonlinear time history analysis. It has been shown that, considering different intensity measures (IM) leads us to overestimate or low estimate the damage probability which has been discussed completely.

Keywords

References

  1. Agency, F.E.M. (2009), "Quantification of building seismic performance factors", FEMA P695, Washington, DC.
  2. Alam, S., Rahman Bhuiyan, M.A. and Muntasir Billah, A.H.M. (2012), "Seismic fragility assessment of SMA-bar restrained multi-span continuous highway bridge isolated by different laminated rubber bearings in medium to strong seismic risk zones", B. Earthq. Eng.,10(6), 1885-1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9381-8
  3. Kalantari, A. and Amjadian, M. (2010), "An approximate method for dynamic analysis of skewed highway bridges with continuous rigid deck", Eng. Struct., 32(9), 2850-2860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.004
  4. Amjadian, M. and Kalantari, A. (2012), "Influence of seismic pounding on dynamic response of skewed highway bridges", 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon.
  5. Ataei, N. and Padgett, J.E (2013), "Limit state capacities for global performance assessment of bridges exposed to hurricane surge and wave", Struct. Saf., 41, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.10.005
  6. Bayat, M., Daneshjoo, F. and Nistico, N. (2015a), "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of multi-span highway bridges", Steel Compos. Struct., 19(1), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.1.237
  7. Bayat, M., Daneshjoo, F. and Nistico, N. (2015b), "A novel proficient and sufficient intensity measure for probabilistic analysis of skewed highway bridges", Struct. Eng. Mech., 55(6), 1177-1202. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.6.1177
  8. Bisadi,V., Head, M. and Gardoni, P. (2011), "Seismic fragility estimates and optimization of retrofitting strategies for reinforced concrete bridges", Case study of the fabela bridge in Toluca, Mexico, ASCE Structures Congress, 13-22.
  9. Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B. and Fumal, T.E. (1993), "Estimation of response spectra and peak accelerations from western North American earthquakes: an interim report", Open-File Report 93-509, U.S. Geological Survey.
  10. Choi, E., DesRoches, R. and Nielson, B. (2004), "Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones", Eng. Struct., 26(2), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006
  11. Cimerallo, G.P., Reinhorn, A.M. and Bruneau, M. (2010), "Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience", Eng. Struct., 32(11), 3639-3649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
  12. Cornell, A.C., Jalayer, F. and Hamburger, R.O. (2002), "Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines", J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 526-532. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)
  13. Deepu, S.P., Prajapat. K. and Ray-Chaudhuri. S. (2014), "Seismic vulnerability of skew bridges under bidirectional ground motions", Eng. Struct., 71(9), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.013
  14. Eads, L., Miranda, E., Krawinkler, H. and Lignos, D. (2013), "An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 42(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2191
  15. Elnashai, A.S, Borzi, B. and Vlachos, S. (2004), "Deformation-based vulnerability functions for R/C bridges", Struct. Eng. Mech., 17(2), 215-244. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2004.17.2.215
  16. Federal Emergency Management Agency (1999), "Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model", HAZUS99 User's Manual, Washington DC.
  17. FEMA (2003), HAZUS-MH MR1: Technical Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, DC.
  18. Ghobarah, A. and Tso, W. (1973), "Seismic analysis of skewed highway bridges with intermediate supports", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 2(3), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290020304
  19. Hwang, H., Liu, J. and Chiu, Y. (2001), "Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges", Center for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, Memphis, Technical Report.
  20. Kameshwar, S. and Padgett, J.E. (2014), "Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards," Eng. Struct., 78(11), 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.016
  21. Katsanos, E.I. and Sextos, A.G. (2013), "An integrated software environment for structure-specific earthquake ground motion selection," Adv. Eng. Soft., 58, 70-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.01.003
  22. Mackie, K. and Stojadinovic, B. (2003), "Seismic demands for performance-based design of bridges," PEER Report No. 2003/16, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley CA.
  23. Maragakis, E.A. and Jennings, P.C. (1987), "Analytical models for the rigid body motions of skew bridges", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 15(8), 923-944. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290150802
  24. Meng, J.Y. and Lui, E.M. (2000), "Seismic analysis and assessment of a skew highway bridge", Eng. Struct., 22, 1433-1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00097-8
  25. Nielson, G.B. (2005), "Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones", Georgia Institute of Technology, in partial requirement for the requirement for Doctor of Philosophy.
  26. Padgett Jamie, E., Nielson Bryant, G. and DesRoches, R. (2008), "Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 37(5), 711-725. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.782
  27. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M.Q., Kim, H., Uzawa, T. and Ueda, T. (2001), "Statistical analysis of bridge fragility curves", Unpublished MCEER Technical Report.
  28. Shinozuka, M., Kim, S.H., Kushiyama S. and Yi, J.H. (2002), "Fragility curves of concrete bridges retrofitted by Column Jacketing", J. Earthq. Eng. E. Vibr., 1(2), 195-205 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-002-0065-2
  29. Sung, Y.C. and Su. C.K. (2011), "Time-dependent seismic fragility curves on optimal retrofitting of neutralised reinforced concrete bridges", Struct Infrastr. E., 7(10), 797-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470902989720
  30. Tavares, D.H., Padgett. J.E.and Paultre P. (2012), "Fragility curves of typical as-built highway bridges in eastern Canada", Eng. Struct., 40(9), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.019
  31. Wakefield, R.R., Nazmy, A.S. and Billington, D.P. (1991), "Analysis of seismic failure in skew RC bridge", J. Struct. Eng., 117(3), 972-986. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:3(972)
  32. Wright, T., DesRoches, R. and Padgett, J.E. (2011), "Bridge seismic retrofitting practices in the Central and Southeastern United States", J. Bridge Eng., 16(1), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000128
  33. Yi, J.H., Kim, S.H. and Kushiyama, S. (2007), "PDF interpolation technique for seismic fragility analysis of bridges", Eng. Struct., 29, 1312-1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.019

Cited by

  1. Seismic fragility curves for highly skewed highway bridges vol.19, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.18340
  2. Closed-form fragility analysis of the steel moment resisting frames vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.21.1.093
  3. Multivariate probabilistic seismic demand model for the bridge multidimensional fragility analysis 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0414-y
  4. A novel index for damage detection of deck and dynamic behavior of horizontally curved bridges under moving load vol.19, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.19370
  5. Optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand models of RC high-rise buildings vol.13, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.3.221
  6. Seismic evaluation of isolated skewed bridges using fragility function methodology vol.20, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.20.4.419
  7. Comparison of different local site effect estimation methods in site with high thickness of alluvial layer deposits: a case study of Babol city vol.13, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-5258-3
  8. Seismic fragility analysis of sea-crossing continuous rigid frame bridges based on fuzzy failure vol.34, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.055