대한치과의사협회지 (The Journal of the Korean dental association)

  • 제52권3호
  • /
  • Pages.132-138
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 0376-4672(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-7961(eISSN)
대한치과의사협회 (The Korean Dental Association)
권호 표지

임상가를 위한 특집 1 - CBCT의 선택과 처방

How to Choose and Use the CBCT

  • 안창현 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면방사선학교실)
  • An, Chang-Hyeon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2014.02.03
  • 심사 : 2014.02.11
  • 발행 : 2014.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The emergence of Cone Beam Computed Tomography(CBCT) in the late 1990s represented an innovative advancement in the field of dental and maxillofacial radiology because it greatly reduced the radiation exposure to patients and offered 3D images easily. The 3D information generated by this technique brings the potential of improved diagnosis and treatment planning for a wide range of clinical applications in dentistry. The use of CBCT includes diagnosis and surgical assessment of the orofacial hard tissue lesions, dental implant treatment planning and postoperative evaluation, TMJ assessment, diagnosis of craniofacial fracture, orthodontics, endodontics, and so on. All CBCT examinations should be justified on an individualized needs. The clinical benefits to the patient for each CBCT scan must outweigh the potential risks associated with exposure to ionizing radiation. CBCT scans should be taken with initially obtained medical and dental histories of patients and a close clinical examination. CBCT should be considered as an imaging alternative of other conventional radiography in cases where the anatomical structures of interest may not be seen. The smallest possible field of view(FOV) and the lowest setting of tube current and scan time should be chosen, and the entire images scanned should be interpreted by a qualified expert.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6:31-36. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.259.x
  2. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol 2005;56:413-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.05.011
  3. Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K, Ito K. Clinical application of a new cone-beam computerized tomography system to assess multiple two-dimensional images for the preoperative treatment planning of maxillary implants: case reports. Quintessence Int 2004;35:525-528.
  4. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:228-231.
  5. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:825-833.
  6. Honda K, Matumoto K, Kashima M, Takano Y, Kawashima S, Arai Y. Single air contrast arthrography for temporomandibular joint disorder using limited cone beam computed tomography for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:271-273. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/50972902
  7. Tsiklakis K, Syriopoulos K, Stamatakis HC. Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:196-201. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/27403192
  8. Honda K, Arai Y, Kashima M, Takano Y, Sawada K, Ejima K, et al. Evaluation of the usefulness of the limited cone-beam CT (3DX) in the assessment of the thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:391-395. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/54316470
  9. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:126-130. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600680
  10. Heiland M, Schulze D, Rother U, Schmelzle R. Postoperative imaging of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures using digital volume tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1387-1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.215
  11. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod 2007;33:1121-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.011
  12. Aboudara CA, Hatcher D, Nielsen IL, Miller A. A three-dimensional evaluation of the upper airway in adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6:173-175.
  13. Baumrind S, Carlson S, Beers A, Curry S, Norris K, Boyd RL. Using three-dimensional imaging to assess treatment outcomes in orthodontics: a progress report from the University of the Pacific. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6:132-142. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.246.x
  14. Maki K, Inou N, Takanishi A, Miller AJ. Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam X-ray computed tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6:95-101. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.241.x
  15. Cohnen M, Kemper J, Mobes O, Pawelzik J, Modder U. Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 2002;12:634-637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300100928
  16. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:83-86. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/28403350
  17. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:508-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00350-0
  18. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229-234. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/26310390
  19. Ngan DC, Kharbanda OP, Geenty JP, Darendeliler MA. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Aust Orthod J 2003;19:67-75.
  20. White SC. 1992 assessment of radiation risk from dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992;21:118-126. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.21.3.1397466
  21. Danforth RA, Clark DE. Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:236-243. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.103526
  22. Gibbs SJ. Effective dose equivalent and effective dose: comparison for common projections in oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:538-545. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.109189
  23. Hu H, He HD, Foley WD, Fox SH. Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology 2000;215:55-62. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap3755
  24. Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH, Resnik R, Reardon GT, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent. 2012;21:78-86. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31824885b5
  25. Baba R, Konno Y, Ueda K, Ikeda S. Comparison of flat-panel detector and image-intensifier detector for cone-beam CT. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2002;26:153-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-6111(02)00008-3
  26. Baba R, Ueda K, Okabe M. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:285-290. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/87440549
  27. Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites EJ. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:187-195. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/74941012
  28. The SEDENTEXCT Project. Radiation Protection: Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology: Evidence Based Guidelines 2011 (v2.0 Final). www.sedentexct.eu/files/guidelines _final.pdf. Accessed May 11, 2012.
  29. Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, et al; American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:561-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.007
  30. Joint Position Statement of the American Association of Endodontists and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics. www.aaomr.org/resource/resmgr /Docs/AAOMR-AAE_postition_paper_CB.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2012.
  31. Academy of Osseointegration. 2010 guidelines of the Academy of Osseointegration for the provision of dental implants and associated patient care. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:620-627.
  32. Scarfe WC. "All that glitters is not gold": standards for cone-beam computerized tomographic imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:402-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.006