The Journal of the Korean dental association (대한치과의사협회지)

The Korean Dental Association (대한치과의사협회)
권호 표지

Dental materials in patients with oral mucosal disease based on the results of patch test study

구강점막질환환자에서 치과재료를 이용한 첩포시험 결과에 대한 고찰

  • Jeong, Sung-Hee (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Su (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Hee (Department of Oral Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University) ;
  • Ok, Soo-Min (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Heo, Jun-Young (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Ahn, Yong-Woo (Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Dental Research Institute)
  • 정성희 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 김지수 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 김경희 (인제대학교 부산백병원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 옥수민 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 허준영 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 안용우 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실)
  • Received : 2014.01.03
  • Accepted : 2014.01.22
  • Published : 2014.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of positive patch test reaction to dental materials in patients with oral mucosal diseases. Epicutaneous patch test was performed in 110 patients with oral mucosal diseases; 41 patients with oral lichen planus(OLP), 44 patients with burning mouth syndrome(BMS), 25 patients with other oral mucosal diseases including recurrent aphthous ulcer and mucous membrane pemphigoid. The obtained results were as follows: Oral gold restorations were most common in patents with oral mucosal diseases and porcelain fused metal crown, implant appeared in the order. 33 of 110 patients did not appear skin reactions (negative, 30%) and 77 patients (positive, 70%) had skin reactions including redness, rash, blisters. Dental materials causing positive reaction to patch test were mainly as gold-sodium-thiosulfate (26.7%), nickel sulfate(Ni) (22.7%), cobalt chloride(Co) (14.7%), palladium chloride(Pd) (11.9%), potassium dichromate (10.7%) in order, respectively. In conclusion, old metal restorations could be the cause of oral mucosal diseases and epicutaneous patch test could be used as a tool to improve the oral conditions.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 부산대학교

References

  1. Sapp JP, Eversole LR, Wysocki GP. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial pathology, 1997, Clarinda Co., pp. 245-248.
  2. Sharma A, Bialynicki-Birula R, Schwartz RA, Janniger CK. Lichen planus: An update and review. Cutis 2012;90:17-23.
  3. McParland H, Warnakulasuriya S. Oral lichenoid contact lesions to mercury and dental amalgam-a review. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012;2012:589-569.
  4. Ahlgren C, Isaksson M, Moller H, Axell T, Liedholm R, Bruze M. The necessity of a test reading after 1 week to detect late positive patch test reactions in patients with oral lichen lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2013 oct 6. [Epub ahead of print]
  5. Alanko K, Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Kannas L, Estlander T. Oral mucosal diseases investigated by patch testing with a dental screening series. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:263-267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02197.x
  6. Holmstrup P. Reactions of the oral mucosa related to silver amalgam: A review. J Oral Pathol Med 1991;20:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1991.tb00878.x
  7. Vass G, Torkos A, Altmayer A et al. Epicutaneous patch test--a new diagnostic option to prevent the rejection of silicone-covered cochlear implants in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013;77:1635- 1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.06.023
  8. Cobos-Fuentes MJ, Martinez-Sahuquillo-Marquez A, Gallardo-Castillo I, Armas-Padron JR, Moreno- Fernandez A, Bullon-Fernandez P. Oral lichenoid lesions related to contact with dental materials: A literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:e514-20.
  9. Lindmaier A, Lindemayr H. Problems with dental prosthesis and dental filling materials: Results of epicutaneous tests, consequences and follow-up. Z Hautkr 1989;64:24-30.
  10. Koch P, Bahmer FA. Oral lesions and symptoms related to metals used in dental restorations: A clinical, allergological, and histologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:422-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70116-7
  11. Dal Sacco D, Gibelli D, Gallo R. Contact allergy in the burning mouth syndrome: A retrospective study on 38 patients. Acta Derm Venereol 2005;85:63-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/000155550410021457
  12. Bakula A, Lugovic-Mihic L, Situm M, Turcin J, Sinkovic A. Contact allergy in the mouth: Diversity of clinical presentations and diagnosis of common allergens relevant to dental practice. Acta Clin Croat 2011;50:553-561.
  13. Polanco I. Celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008;47 Suppl 1:S3-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181818df5
  14. 민숙진, 안형준, 박준상, 고명연. 첩포시험을 이용한 구강점막질환 환자의 접촉성 과민반응에 대한 평가. 대한구강내과학회지 2002;27:159-172
  15. Levi L, Barak S, Katz J. Allergic reactions associated with metal alloys in porcelain-fused-tometal fixed prosthodontic devices-A systematic review. Quintessence Int 2012;43:871-877.
  16. Rasanen L, Kalimo K, Laine J, Vainio O, Kotiranta J, Pesola I. Contact allergy to gold in dental patients. Br J Dermatol 1996;134:673-677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1996.tb06968.x
  17. Moller H. Dental gold alloys and contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2002;47:63-66. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.470201.x
  18. Stenman E, Bergman M. Hypersensitivity reactions to dental materials in a referred group of patients. Scand J Dent Res 1989;97:76-83.
  19. Marino R, Capaccio P, Pignataro L, Spadari F. Burning mouth syndrome: The role of contact hypersensitivity. Oral Dis 2009;15:255-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01515.x
  20. Grushka M, Epstein JB, Gorsky M. Burning mouth syndrome. Am Fam Physician 2002;65:615-620.
  21. Issa Y, Brunton PA, Glenny AM, Duxbury AJ. Healing of oral lichenoid lesions after replacing amalgam restorations: A systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:553-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.12.027
  22. Dunsche A, Kastel I, Terheyden H, Springer IN, Christophers E, Brasch J. Oral lichenoid reactions associated with amalgam: Improvement after amalgam removal. Br J Dermatol 2003;148:70-76. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.04936.x
  23. Mehulic M, Mehulic K, Kos P, Komar D, Katunaric M. Expression of contact allergy in undergoing prosthodontic therapy patients with oral diseases. Minerva Stomatol 2005;54:303-309.
  24. Brandao GA, Simas RM, de Almeida LM et al. Evaluation of ionic degradation and slot corrosion of metallic brackets by the action of different dentifrices. Dental Press J Orthod 2013;18:86-93.
  25. Mutlu-Sagesen L, Ergun G, Karabulut E. Ion release from metal-ceramic alloys in three different media. Dent Mater J 2011;30:598-610. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-031
  26. Kim YJ, Kim YK, Kho HS. Effects of smoking on trace metal levels in saliva. Oral Dis 2010;16:823-830. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01698.x
  27. Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Otani T et al. Screening for symptomatic metal sensitivity: A prospective study of 92 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Biomaterials 2005;26:1019-1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.038
  28. Cadosch D, Chan E, Gautschi OP, Filgueira L. Metal is not inert: Role of metal ions released by biocorrosion in aseptic loosening--current concepts. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;91:1252-1262.
  29. Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Tomlinson MJ, Gavrilovic J, Black J, Peoc'h M. Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:457-476. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.82B3.9310
  30. Virgili A, Corazza M, Trombelli L, Arcidiacono A. Burning mouth syndrome: The role of contact hypersensitivity. Acta Derm Venereol 1996;76:488-490
  31. Hietanen J, Pihlman K, Forstrom L, Linder E, Reunala T. No evidence of hypersensitivity to dental restorative metals in oral lichen planus. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:320-327.