The effect of mechanical properties of bone in the mandible, a numerical case study

  • 투고 : 2013.03.09
  • 심사 : 2013.06.17
  • 발행 : 2013.03.25


Bone properties are one of the key components when constructing models that can simulate the mechanical behavior of a mandible. Due to the complexity of the structure, the tooth, ligaments, different bones etc., some simplifications are often considered and bone properties are one of them. The objective of this study is to understand if a simplification of the problem is possible and assess its influence on mandible behavior. A cadaveric toothless mandible was used to build three computational models from CT scan information: a full cortical bone model; a cortical and cancellous bone model, and a model where the Young's modulus was obtained as function of the pixel value in a CT scan. Twelve muscle forces were applied on the mandible. Results showed that although all the models presented the same type of global behavior and proximity in some locations, the influence of cancellous bone can be seen in strain distribution. The different Young's modulus defined by the CT scan gray scale influenced the maximum and minimum strains. For modeling general behavior, a full cortical bone model can be effective. However, when cancellous bone is included, maximum values in thin regions increase the strain distribution. Results revealed that when properties are assigned to the gray scale some peaks could occur which did not represent the real situation.



  1. Austman, R.L., Milner, J.S., Holdsworth, D.W. and Dunning, C.E. (2008), "The effect of the density-modulus relationship selected to apply material properties in a finite element model of long bone", J. Biomech., 41( 3), 171-3176.
  2. Bujtar, P., Sandor, G.K., Bojtos, A., Szucs, A. and Barabas, J. (2010), "Finite element analysis of the human mandible at 3 different stages of life", Oral Surg. Oral Med. O., 110(3), 301-309.
  3. Chen, G., Schmutz, B., Epari, D., Rathnayaka, K., Ibrahim, S., Schuetz, M.A. and Pearcy, M.J. (2010), "A new approach for assigning bone material properties from CT images into finite element models", J. Biomech., 43(5), 1011-1015.
  4. Chowdhury, A.R., Kashi, A. and Saha, S. (2011), "A comparison of stress distributions for different surgical procedures, screw dimensions and orientations for a Temporomandibular joint implant", J. Biomech., 44(14), 2584-2587.
  5. Groning, F., Liu, J., Fagan, M.J. and O'Higgins, P. (2009), "Validating a voxel-based finite element model of a human mandible using digital speckle pattern interferometry", J. Biomech., 42(9), 1224-1229.
  6. Helgason, B., Perilli, E, Schileo, E., Taddei, F., Brynjolfsson, S. and Viceconti, M. (2008), "Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review", Clin. Biomech., 23(2), 135-146.
  7. Helgason, B., Taddei, F., Palsson, H., Schileo, E., Cristofolini, L., Viceconti, M. and Brynjolfsson, S. (2008), "A modified method for assigning material properties to FE models of bones", Med. Eng. Phys., 30(4), 444-453.
  8. Huang, H.L., Tsai, M.T., Lin, D.J., Chien, C.S. and Hsu, J.T. (2010), "A new method to evaluate the elastic modulus of cortical bone by using a combined computed tomography and finite element approach", Comput. Biol. Med., 40(4), 464-468.
  9. Kalender, W. A. (2006), "X-ray computed tomography", Phys. Med. Biol., 51, 29-43.
  10. Iwashita, Y. (2000), "Basic study of the measurement of bone mineral content of cortical and cancellous bone of the mandible by computed tomography", Dentomaxillofac. Rad., 29, 209-215.
  11. Liu, J.G., Li, D.S., Ma, W.H., Zhou, Z.P. and Xu, X.X. (2004), "Computer assisted reconstruction of 3D canal model of femur and design for custom-made stem", Chin. Med. J.117(8), 1265-1267.
  12. Marinescu, R., Daegling, D.J. and Rapoff, A.J. (2005), "Finite-element modeling of the anthropoid mandible: the effects of altered boundary conditions", Anat. Rec. Part A, 283(2), 300-309.
  13. Mesnard, M. (2005), Elaboration et validation d'un protocol de caractérisation de l'Articulation Temporo-Mandibulaire, University Bordeux, IST Press.
  14. Mesnard, M., Ramos, A., Ballu, A., Morlier, J. Cid, M. And Simoes, J.A. (2011), "Biomechanical analysis comparing natural and alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement using a finite element model", J. Oral Maxil. Surg., 69(4), 1008-1017.
  15. Panagiotopoulou, O., Curtis, N., O'Higgins, P. and Cobb, S.N. (2010), "Modelling subcortical bone in finite element analyses: a validation and sensitivity study in the macaque mandible", J. Biomech., 43(8), 1603-1611.
  16. Parascandolo, S., Spinzia, A., Piombino, P. and Califano, L. (2010), "Two load sharing plates fixation in mandibular condylar fractures: biomechanical basis", J. Cranio Maxill. Surg., 38(5), 385-390.
  17. Ramos, A., Completo, A., Relvas, C., Mesnard. M. and Simoes, J.A. (2011), "Straight, semi-anatomic and anatomic TMJ implants: the influence of condylar geometry and bone fixation screws", J. Cranio Maxill. Surg., 39(5), 343-350.
  18. Reina-Romo, E., Sampietro-Fuentes, A., Gomez-Benito, M.J., Dominguez, J., Doblare, M. And Garcia-Aznar, J.M. (2010), "Biomechanical response of a mandible in a patient affected with hemifacial microsomia before and after distraction osteogenesis", Med. Eng. Phys., 32, 860-866.
  19. Rho, J.Y., Hobatho, M.C., and Ashman, R.B. (1995), "Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone", Med. Eng. Phy., 17(5), 347-355.
  20. Roberts, W.E., Huja, S. and Roberts, J.A. (2004), "Bone modeling: biomechanics, molecular mechanisms, and clinical perspectives", Semin. Orthod., 10(2), 123-161.
  21. Sato, H., Kawamura, A., Yamaguchi, M. and Kasai, K. (2005), "Relationship between masticatory function and internal structure of the mandible based on computed tomography findings", Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac., 128(6), 766-773.
  22. Sun, W. and Lal, P. (2002), "Recent development on computer aided tissue engineering - a review", Comp. Methods Programs Biomed., 67(2), 85-103.
  23. Tie, Y., Ma, R., Ye, M., Wang, D. and Wang. C. (2006), "Rapid prototyping fabrication and finite element evaluation of 3D medical pelvic model", Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 28(3-4), 302-306.
  24. Wong, R.C., Tideman, H., Merkx, M.A., Jansen, J., Goh, S.M. and Liao, K. (2011), "Review of biomechanical models used in studying the biomechanics of reconstructed mandibles", Int. J. Oral Maxil. Surg., 40, 393-400.
  25. Yosibash, Z., Trabelsi, N. and Milgrom, C. (2007), "Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations", J. Biomech., 40(16), 3688-3699.
  26. Zannoni, C., Mantovani, R. and Viceconti, M. (1998), "Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method", Med. Eng. Phy., 20(10), 735-740.
  27. Zhang, F., Peck, C.C. and Hannam, A.G. (2002), "Mass properties of the human mandible", J. Biomech., 35(7), 975-978.

피인용 문헌

  1. Evaluating the Effect of Minimizing Screws on Stabilization of Symphysis Mandibular Fracture by 3D Finite Element Analysis vol.16, pp.2, 2017,