DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

소아·청소년 환자의 매복치 특성과 치료에 관한 연구

A Statistical Study on Characteristics and Treatment of Child and Adolescent Patients with Tooth Impaction

  • 조완선 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이난영 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이상호 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Jo, Wansun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Nanyoung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Sangho (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 투고 : 2014.05.02
  • 심사 : 2014.10.16
  • 발행 : 2014.11.30

초록

매복치란 맹출 연령임에도 맹출이 되지 않았거나, 임상적, 방사선학적 관찰을 통해 완전한 맹출이 어려울 것으로 예상되는 치아이다. 매복치는 치근 변위와 흡수, 인접치의 치주적 문제, 재발성 통증, 낭종의 형성과 같은 잠재적인 문제의 원인이 될 수 있으며, 상악 전치부의 경우 심미적인 문제를 야기 할 수 있다. 이 연구는 조선대학교 치과 병원에 내원하여 매복치로 진단 받은 15세 이하의 소아 청소년 환자의 매복치 특성과 치료에 대해 분석해 보기 위해 시행되었다. 매복 제3대구치, 매복 과잉치, 매복 유치를 제외한 335명의 환자를 대상으로 한명의 조사자가 환자의 전자 차트 기록과 파노라마 방사선 사진, 치근단 방사선 사진을 통해 매복치아의 위치, 매목의 원인, 치료방법, 견인치료 기간 등을 조사 하였다. 매복의 빈도는 다음과 같았다 : 상악 견치, 상악 절치, 하악 소구치, 상악 소구치, 하악 견치. 치아 매복의 원인으로는 치배 위치나 맹출 경로 이상(38.04%), 국소적 병소의 존재(35.01%)가 대부분을 차지하였다. 매복치의 치료로는 교정적 견인(46.01%)가 가장 많았다. 국소적 병소 같은 명확한 방해요인이 있는 경우 견인 기간이 상대적으로 짧게 나타났으며, 상악 절치의 경우가 매복 상악 견치보다 짧은 견인기간이 관찰되었다. 본 연구에서, 교정적 견인의 성공률은 96.7%였으며, 5증례가 실패하였다. 3증례는 장치협조도 불량으로 인한 것 이었으며, 2증례는 치아 유착으로 인한 실패였다. 매복치의 견인은 연령이 증가 할수록 불리할 것으로 여겨진다. 따라서, 정기적 검진을 통한 조기의 진단과 적절한 치료계획이 매우 중요하다. 또한, 소아 청소년 환자의 성공적인 교정적 견인 치료를 위해서는 환아의 협조도가 특히 중요할 것으로 생각된다.

Impacted teeth are teeth with a delayed eruption time or that are expected to erupt incompletely. Those teeth can cause a series of potential problems such as root displacement and resorption, periodontal problems in adjacent teeth, referred pain and the formation of cysts and odontogenic tumors. The purpose of this study was to investigate characteristics and treatment of child and adolescent patients younger than 15 years of age that were diagnosed with an impacted tooth who visited the Chosun University Dental Hospital. The impacted tooth, its etiology, treatment and traction period were surveyed through electric medical records, radiographs in 335 patients. We excluded the impacted third molar, supernumerary and deciduous teeth from this study. The most frequently impacted teeth are upper canine, followed by the upper incisor. The most common etiologies of impaction were an abnormal eruption pathway and localized pathologic lesions. The treatment of an impacted tooth was mostly orthodontic traction. The traction period was relatively short in cases with distinct obstacles, with an impacted upper incisor and if patients were younger. An orthodontic traction is considered to be more unfavorable if the patient gets older. Therefore, an early diagnosis and a precise treatment plan through a regular check-ups are mandatory.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Thilander B, Jakobsson SO : Local factors in impaction of maxillary canines. Acta Odontol Scand, 26:145, 1968. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356809004587
  2. Nan-Young Lee : Eruption guidance for impacted canine. The Journal of the Korean Dental Association, 50:312-321, 2012.
  3. Sant'Anna EF, Marquezan M, Sant'Anna CF : Impacted incisors associated with supernumerary teeth treated with a modified Haas appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 42:863-71, 2012.
  4. Anastasia Fardi, Athena Kondylidou-Sidira, Anastasios Tsirlis, et al. : Incidence of impacted and supernumerary teeth-a radiographic study in a North Greek population. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal, 16:56-61, 2011.
  5. Rui Hou, Liang Kong, Guicai Liu, et al. : Investigation of Impacted Permanent Teeth Except the Third Molar in Chinese Patients Through an XRay Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 68:762-767, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.137
  6. Shah RM, Boyd MA, Vakil TF : Studies of permanent tooth anomalies in 7,886 Canadian individuals. I: Impacted teeth. J Can Dent Assoc, 44:262, 1978.
  7. Nagahara K, Yuasa S, Utida H, et al. : Etiological study of relationship between impacted permanent teeth and malocclusion. Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi, 27:913-24, 1989.
  8. Dachi SF, Howell FV : A survey of 3874 routine full-mouth radiographs. II: A study of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 14:1165, 1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(61)90204-3
  9. Becker A : Early treatment for impacted maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121:586-7, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.124171
  10. Ryu SH, Lee CS, Lee SH : Management of impacted teeth by autotransplantation in children. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 27:564-572, 2000.
  11. Pack JA, Yang KH, Choi NK, et al. : The eruption guidance of an impacted tooth associated with a complex odontoma : Case report. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 34:651-657, 2007.
  12. Jeon SY, Lee NY, Lee SH : Three-dimensional evaluation of impacted maxillary canines using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiographs. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 40:106-117, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2013.40.2.106
  13. Moon CH, Kang HW, Choi JH : Research on Characteristics and treatment duration and method of patients with tooth impaction who visited Gachon University Gil Hospital Orthodontic Department (year 2005-2008). The Journal of the Korean Dental Association, 49:211-218, 2011.
  14. Kim HJ, Choi YS, Lee SH, et al. : A statistical study on the impacted teeth by orthodontic traction. Oral Biology Research, 29:63-70. 2005.
  15. Ericson S, Kurol J : Radiographic assessment of maxillary canine eruption in children with clinical signs of eruption disturbance. Eur J Orthod, 8:133-40, 1986.
  16. Kaan Gundaz, Aydan Acikgoz, Erol Egrioglu : Radiologic investigation of prevalence, associated pathologies and dental anomalies of Non-Third Molar impacted teeth in Turkish oral patients. The chinese Journal of dental research, 14:141-146, 2011.
  17. Bayram M, Ozer M, Sener I : Maxillary canine impactions related to impacted central incisors: two case reports. J Contemp Dent Pract, 8:72-81, 2007.
  18. Chaushu S, Chaushu G, Becher A : The use of panoramic radiographs to localize displaced maxillary canines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 85:511-6, 1999.
  19. Becker A, Chaushu S : Success rate and duration of orthodontic treatment for adult patients with palatally impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124:509-14, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00578-X
  20. Giliana Zuccati, Jamile Ghobadlu, Carlo Clausera, et al. : Factors associated with the duration of forced eruption of impacted maxillary canines : A retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130:349-356, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.028
  21. Mirabella D, Giunta G, Lombardo L : Substitution of impacted canines by maxillary first premolars: a valid alternative to traditional orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 143:125-33, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.029
  22. Ferguson JW : Management of the unerupted maxillary canine. Br Dent J, 169:11-7, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807250
  23. Deng-gao Liu, Wan-lin Zhang, Xu-chen Ma, et al. : Localization of impacted maxillary canines and observation of adjacent incisor resorption with conebeam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 105:91-8, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.01.030
  24. Brin I, Zilberman Y, Azaz B : The unerupted maxillary central incisor: review of its etiology and treatment. ASDC J Dent Child, 49:352-56, 1982.
  25. Orton HS, Garvey MT, Pearson MH : Extrusion of the ectopic maxillary canine using a lower removable appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 107: 349-59, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70087-0
  26. Shapira Y, Kuftinec MM : Early diagnosis and interception of potential maxillary canine impaction. J Am Dent Assoc, 129:1450, 1998. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0080

피인용 문헌

  1. Factors and Treatments Influencing the Unilaterally Unerupted Maxillary Central Incisor vol.45, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2018.45.3.334