Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Symbiotic Design Process of Digital - Analog Models and the Role of BIM in the Next Generation Design Environment - Focusing on the Smart Architectural Space Design -

차세대 설계환경에서 디지털-아날로그 모델의 공생적 과정과 BIM의 역할 - 스마트 건축공간 설계를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2014.07.31
  • Accepted : 2014.10.29
  • Published : 2014.11.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Traditionally, designers have used models to represent abstract design ideas or to analyse and evaluate the refined design solutions. The digital model, in particular, represents the logics, process, and intended result of the design in the form of digital information and media. Innovations in Internet of Things (IoT) and smart technologies now enable the various levels of real-world spatial interactions that were possible only when the user becomes an avatar in a cyberspace. This levels of interaction are virtualized for the design and the building itself by real-time interaction between digital and analogue model. This is the notion of smart space design. Smart space is defined as a kind of machine which is an assembly of sensors, actuators, and processors. This nature calls for a new design process model based on prototyping paradigm rather than traditional form-making process. Smart Analog Model is proposed to provide the real-world interaction with the functions and behaviours of the smart space being designed. Such a design process can be better supported by the symbiotic interaction between Digital Model (DM) and Smart Analog Model (SAM). The structure of the smart space is analysed and the role of BIM is discussed in the framework of the symbiotic design process. An exemplary design case of a kinetic facade is conducted to examine the usability of the proposed process model.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 국토교통부

References

  1. 김성아(1997), CAAD 교육에 있어서 모델링의 역할, 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 제 13권, 제 7호, p.p. 37-43
  2. 김성아(2012), 디지털 건축과 BIM, 대한건축학회지 제 56권, 제 11호, p.p. 15-18
  3. Calado A. V. S., Soares M. M., Campos F. and Correia W. (2013), Virtual Reality Applied to the Study of the Interaction between the User and the Built Space: A Literature Review, Design, User Experience, and Usability 8014, p.p. 345-351
  4. Carpo M. (2013), The ebb and flow of digital Innovation: from form making to form finding - and beyond, Journal of Architectural Design 83, Special Issue: The Innovation of Imperative: Architectures and Vitality, No. 1, p.p. 56-61
  5. Intenational Alliance for Interoperability (2013), IFC $2{\times}4$, http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/ifc/IFC4/final/html/index.htm
  6. Jeng T. (2009), Toward a ubiquitous smart space design framework, Journal of Information Science and Engineering 25, p.p. 675-686
  7. Lopez T. S., Ranasinghe D. C., Patkai B. and McFarlane D. (2011), Taxonomy, technology and applications of smart objects, Information Systems Front, p.p. 281-300
  8. Papadopoulou E., Gallacher S., Taylor N. K. and Williams H. (2012), A personal smart space approach to realising ambient ecologies, Journal of Pervasive and Mobile Computing 8, p.p. 485-499 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.10.008
  9. Say M. (2014), Ubiquitous computing riding the next ware, Journal of ITNOW 56, No. 1, p.p. 2-3
  10. Shelden D. R. (2002), Digital surface representation and the constructibility of Gehry's architecture, Maschusetts Institute of Technology
  11. Singh B., Pardyjak E. R., Norgren A and Willemsen P. (2011), Accelerating urban fast response Largrangian dispersion simulations using inexpensive graphics processor parallelism, Environmental Modelling & Software 26, p.p. 739-750 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.12.011
  12. Sun L., Fukuda T., Tokuhara T. and Yabuki N. (2013), Differences in spatial understanding between physical and virtual models, Frontier of Architectural Research 3, p.p. 28-35
  13. Volander M. (2014), Virtual reality for architectural acoustics, Journal of Building Performance Simulation, p.p. 1-11
  14. Oxman R. (2008), Digital architecture as a challenge for design pedagogy: theory, knowledge, models and medium, Design Studies, Vol. 29, No. 2, p.p. 99-120 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.003
  15. Oxman R. (2008), Performance-based Design: Current Practice and Research Issues, International Journal of Architectural Computing, Vol. 6, No. 1, p.p. 1-17 https://doi.org/10.1260/147807708784640090