DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Allometric equations, stem density and biomass expansion factors for Cryptomeria japonica in Mount Halla, Jeju Island, Korea

  • Jung, Sung Cheol (Warm Temperate and Subtropical Forest Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Lumbres, Roscinto Ian C. (Warm Temperate and Subtropical Forest Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Won, Hyun Kyu (Warm Temperate and Subtropical Forest Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Seo, Yeon Ok (Warm Temperate and Subtropical Forest Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • Received : 2014.07.31
  • Accepted : 2014.09.12
  • Published : 2014.11.28

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop allometric equations and to determine the stem density and biomass expansion factor (BEF) for the estimation of the aboveground and belowground biomass of Cryptomeria japonica in Jeju Island, Korea. A total of 18 trees were harvested from the 40-year-old C. japonica stands in Hannam experimental forest, Jeju Island. The mean biomass of the C. japonica was $50.4Mg\;ha^{-1}$ in stem wood, $23.1Mg\;ha^{-1}$ in root, $9.6Mg\;ha^{-1}$ in branch, $4.6Mg\;ha^{-1}$ in needle and $4.3Mg\;ha^{-1}$ in stem bark. The diameter at breast height (DBH) was selected as independent variable for the development of allometric equations. To evaluate the performance of these equations, coefficient of determination ($R^2$) and root mean square error (RMSE) were used and results of the evaluation showed that $R^2$ ranged from 71% (root biomass equation) to 96% (aboveground biomass equation) and the RMSE ranged from 0.10 (aboveground biomass equation) to 0.33 (root biomass equation). The mean stem density of C. japonica was $0.37g\;cm^{-3}$ and the mean aboveground BEF was $1.28g\;g^{-1}$. Furthermore, the ratio of the root biomass to aboveground biomass was 0.32.

Keywords

References

  1. Annighofer P, Molder I, Zerbe S, Kawaletz H, Terwei A, Ammer C. 2012. Biomass functions for the two alien tree species Prunus serotina Ehrh. and Robinia pseudoacacia L. in floodplain forests of Northern Italy. Eur J Forest Res 131: 1619-1635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0629-2
  2. Avery TE, Burkhart HE. 2002. Forest Measurements. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
  3. Basuki TM, Van Laake PE, Skidmore AK, Hussin YA. 2009. Allometric equations for estimating the above-ground biomass in tropical lowland Dipterocarp forests. For Ecol Manage 257: 1684-1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.027
  4. Bollandsas OM, Rekstad I, Naesset E, Rosberg I. 2009. Models for predicting above-ground biomass of Betula pubescens spp. czerepanovii in mountain areas of southern Norway. Scand J For Res 24: 318-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580903117412
  5. Chung SY, Yim JS, Cho HK, Jeong JH, Kim SH, Shin MY. 2009. Estimation of forest biomass for Muju county using biomass conversion table and remote sensing data. J Korean For Soc 98: 409-416.
  6. Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J. 1994. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263: 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5144.185
  7. Fang JY, Wang ZM. 2001. Forest biomass estimation at regional and global levels, with special reference to China's forest biomass. Ecol Res 16: 587-592. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00419.x
  8. Fehrmann L, Lehtonen A, Kleinn C, Tomppo E. 2008. Comparison of linear and mixed-effect regression models and k-nearest neighbour approach for estimation of single-tree biomass. Can J For Res 38: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-119
  9. Fujiwara T, Yamashita K, Kuroda K. 2007. Basic densities as a parameter for estimating the amount of carbon removal by forests and their variation. Bull FFPRI 6: 215-226.
  10. Fukuda M, Iehara T, Matsumoto M. 2003. Carbon stock estimates for sugi and hinoki forests in Japan. For Ecol Manage 184: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00146-4
  11. Hosoda K, Iehara T. 2010. Aboveground biomass equations for individual trees of Cryptomeria japonica, Chamaecyparis obtuse and Larix kaempferi in Japan. J For Res 15: 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-010-0192-y
  12. IPCC. 2003. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-use Change and Forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Kanagawa.
  13. IPCC. 2006. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Kanagawa.
  14. Kim C, Jeong J, Kim RH, Son YM, Lee KH, Kim JS, Park IH. 2011. Allometric equations and biomass expansion factors of Japanese red pine on the local level. Landscape Ecol Eng 7: 283-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0131-2
  15. Kim CS, Lee JS, Cho KJ. 1987. Biomass and net production of Cryptomeria japonica and Chamaecyparis obtusa plantation in Changsong district, Chonnam. J Korean For Energy 7: 1-10.
  16. Kim JS, Son Y, Kim ZS. 1995. Allometry and canopy dynamics of Pinus rigida, Larix leptolepis, and Quercus serrata stands in Yangpyeong area. J Korean For Soc 84: 186-197.
  17. Korea Forest Research Institute. 2005. Report on Jeju experiment forest: forest ecosystem. pp 201-215.
  18. Korea Forest Research Institute. 2006a. Symposium on the prospect and utilization of Cryptomeria japonica in Jeju, May 23. Korea Forest Research Institute, Seoul, pp 115.
  19. Korea Forest Research Institute. 2006b. Survey manual for forest biomass. Korea Forest Service, Seoul.
  20. Korea Forest Research Institute. 2010. Survey manual for forest biomass and soil carbon. Korea Forest Service, Seoul.
  21. Korea Forest Service. 2012. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. Korea Forest Service, Seoul, pp 488.
  22. Korea Forest Service. 2014. Jeju Experimental Forest. http://www.forest.go.kr. Accessed 01 April 2014.
  23. Korea Meteorological Administration. 2013. Weather information. http://www.kma.go.kr/. Accessed 1 April 2014.
  24. Lee TJ, Nam MJ, Lee SK, Song Y, Uchida T. 2009. The Jeju dataset: three-dimensional interpretation of MT data from mid-mountain area of Jeju Island, Korea. J Appl Geophys 68: 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.11.006
  25. Lehtonen A, Makipaa R, Heikkinen J, Sievanen R, Liski J. 2004. Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 188: 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.008
  26. Levy PE, Hale SE, Nicoll BC. 2004. Biomass expansion factors and root: shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain. Forestry 77: 421-430. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/77.5.421
  27. Li X, Yi MJ, Son Y, Park PS, Lee KH, Son YM, Kim RH, Jeong MJ. 2010. Biomass expansion factors of natural Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora) forests in Korea. J Plant Biol 53: 381-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-010-9134-7
  28. Lim H, Lee KH, Lee KH, Park IH. 2013. Biomass expansion factors and allometric equations in an age sequence for Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) in southern Korea. J For Res 18: 316-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-012-0353-2
  29. Litton CM, Ryan MG, Tinker DB, Knight DH. 2003. Belowground and aboveground biomass in young postfire lodgepole pine forests of contrasting tree density. Can J For Res 33: 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1139/x02-181
  30. Montagu KD, Duttmer K, Barton CVM, Cowie AL. 2005. Developing general allometric relationships for regional estimates of carbon sequestration-an example using Eucalyptus pilularis from seven contrasting sites. For Ecol Manage 204: 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.003
  31. Park IH, Moon GS. 1994. Biomass, net production and biomass estimation equations in some natural Quercus forests. J Korean For Soc 83: 246-253.
  32. Peichl M, Arain MA. 2007. Allometry and partitioning of above- and belowground tree biomass in an age-sequence of white pine forests. For Ecol Manage 253: 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.003
  33. SAS Institute Inc. 2004. SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide. SAS Publishing, Cary, NC.
  34. Seo YO, Lee, YJ. 2013. Estimation of above- and belowground biomass with consideration of age classes for Cryptomeria japonica stands. J Agric Life Sci 47: 17-23.
  35. Seo YO, Lee YJ, Lumbres RIC, Pyo JK, Kim RH, Son YM, Lee KH. 2013. Influence of stand age class on biomass expansion factor and allometric equations for Pinus rigida plantations in South Korea. Scan J For Res 28: 566-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.786126
  36. Son Y, Hwang JW, Kim ZS, Lee WK, Kim JS. 2001. Allometry and biomass of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) in central Korea. Bioresour Technol 78: 251-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00012-8
  37. Son Y, Kim HW. 1998. Above-ground biomass and nutrient distribution in a 15-year-old Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba) plantation in central Korea. Bioresour Technol 63: 173-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00070-9
  38. Sprugel DG. 1983. Correcting for bias in log transformed allometric equations. Ecology 64: 209-210. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937343
  39. Teobaldelli M, Somogyi Z, Migliavacca M, Usoltsev VA. 2009. Generalized functions of biomass expansion factors for conifers and broadleaved by stand age, growing stock and site index. For Ecol Manage 257: 1004-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.002
  40. Tobin B, Nieuwenhuis M. 2007. Biomass expansion factors for Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) in Ireland. Eur J Forest Res 126: 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-005-0105-3
  41. Vanninen P, Makela A. 2005. Carbon budget for Scots pine trees: effects of size, competition and site fertility on growth allocation and production. Tree Physiol 25: 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.1.17
  42. Wang JR, Letchford T, Comeau P, Kimmins JP. 2000. Above-and below-ground biomass and nutrient distribution of a paper birch and subalpine fir mixed-species stand in the sub-boreal spruce zone of British Columbia. For Ecol Manage 130: 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00193-0
  43. Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ. 2000. Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  44. Xiao CW, Ceulemans R. 2004. Allometric relationships for below- and aboveground biomass of young Scots pines. For Ecol Manage 203: 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.062

Cited by

  1. 삼나무와 편백 임분의 임목, 임상, 토양의 탄소량 비교 vol.109, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2020.109.2.169