DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Emotional Dimension that takes into account the Characteristics of the Arousal axis

각성 축의 특성을 고려한 감정차원에 관한 연구

  • Han, Eui-Hwan (Department of Electronic Engineering, Soongsil University) ;
  • Cha, Hyung-Tai (Department of Electronic Engineering, Soongsil University)
  • 한의환 (숭실대학교 대학원 전자공학과) ;
  • 차형태 (숭실대학교 정보통신전자공학부)
  • Received : 2014.03.04
  • Accepted : 2014.08.18
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

In this paper, we verify the relation between elements (active and inactive) of Russell's emotional dimension ("A Circumplex Model") to propose a new representing method. Russell's emotional dimension expresses emotional words (happy, joy, sad, nervous, etc.) as a point on the two dimensions (Arousal and Valence). It is most commonly used in many filed such as Science of Emotion & Sensibility, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), and Psychology etc. But other researchers have insisted that Russell's emotional dimension have to be modified because of its inherent problems. Such problems included the possibility of mixed feelings, the difference of emotion and sensibility, and the difference of Arousal axis and Valence axis. Therefore, we verify relationship of A Circumplex Model's elements (active and inactive) and find how to people express their Arousal feelings using survey. We finally propose new method to express emotion in Russell's emotional dimension. Using this method, we can solve Russell's problems and compensate other researches.

본 논문에서는 Russell의 감정차원 모델("A Circumplex Model")의 차원 축 중 Arousal 축의 요소(active, inactive)간의 연관성을 파악하여 새로운 감정 표현 방식을 제안한다. Russell의 감정차원 모델은 arousal, valence의 2개의 축 위에 감정을 나타내는 단어(happy, joy, sad, 긴장 등)를 하나의 점으로 표현한다. 이런 Russell 모델은 감성과학, HCI, 심리학 등 여러 분야의 연구에 가장 많이 사용되는 감정 차원이다. 하지만 기존의 연구(복합적 감정, 감정과 감성, arousal 축과 valence 축의 차이점 등)에서는 Russell의 감정차원 모델은 표현방법의 수정이 필요하다고 주장하였다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 2개의 차원 축(arousal, valence) 중 arousal 축의 요소(active, inactive) 간의 연관성을 확인하고 실험을 통하여 사용자들이 본인의 각성(arousal) 정도를 어떠한 방식으로 표현하는지 확인하여 Russell의 감정차원 모델의 새로운 표현 방식을 제안한다. 본 논문에서 제안하는 방식을 이용하여 Russell 모델의 문제점을 보완하였으며, 기존 연구에 대한 근거가 될 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bradley, M. M., Lang, P. J. (2010). Affective Norms for English Words(ANEW): Affective ratings of words and instruction manual, Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-2. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
  2. Cacioppo, J. T. & Berntson G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space : A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates, Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401-423 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.401
  3. Lang, P. J. & Bradley, M. M. & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system(IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual, Technical Report A-8, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
  4. Larsen, J. T. & McGraw, A. P. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Can People Feel Happy and Sad at the Same Time?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 684-696. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.684
  5. Lee, K, Y. (1997). Human Sensibility and Its Measurement and Evaluation, Proceedings of the Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility Conference, 37-42.
  6. Lee, K, Y. (1998). Human Sensibility and Emotion in Sensibility Ergonomics, Korean Journal of The Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 1(1), 113-122.
  7. Kim, J. K. & Moon, H. S. & Oh, K. J. (1998). Validating the Stability of Two-dimensional Structure of Emotion, Korean Journal of the Science for Emotion & Sensibility, 2(1), 43-52.
  8. Koots, L. & Realo, A. & Allik, J. (2012). Relationship Between Linguistic Antonyms in Momentary and Retrospective Ratings of Happiness and Sadness, Journal of individual Difference, Vol. 33(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000061
  9. Mauss, I. B. & Robinson, M.. D. (2009). Measures of emotion: A review, COGNITION AND EMOTION, 23(2), 209-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802204677
  10. Osgood, C. E. & May, W. H. & Miron, M. S. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning, Urbana: University of Illinoise Press.
  11. Park, T. J. & Park, S. H. (2009). Emotional Evaluation about IAPS in Korean University Student. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(2), 183-195.
  12. Russell, J. A. (1980). A Circumplex Model of Affect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714
  13. Russell, J. A. & Lewicka, M. & Nitt, T. (1989). A cross-cultural study of a circumplex model of affect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 848-856. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.848
  14. Russell, J. A. & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.3
  15. Rea, L. M. & Parker, R. A. (2005). Designing & Conduction Survey Research A Comprehensive Guid (3rd Edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  16. Han, E. H. & Cha, H. T. (2013). A study of Emotional Dimension for Mixed Feelings, Korean Journal of The Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 16(4), 469-480.