Correlation between structures related to movement, activity, and participation in Disabled Persons Living at Home

재가 장애인의 운동관련 구조손상 영역 및 활동과 참여 영역의 상관관계 분석

  • Park, Seung Kyu (Department of Physical Therapy, School of Public Health, Sehan University) ;
  • Heo, Jae Won (Department of Physical Therapy, graduate school, Sehan University)
  • 박승규 (세한대학교 보건학부 물리치료학과) ;
  • 허재원 (세한대학교 일반대학원 물리치료학 전공)
  • Received : 2014.03.19
  • Accepted : 2014.04.10
  • Published : 2014.04.25

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the impairments of body structures, activity limitation, and participation restriction. In addition, we wanted to provide basic data on correlation between impairments of body structures, activity, and participation in Disabled Persons Living at Home. Methods: After selection of 128 people with physical disabilities more than the third level and brain damage disabilities living at home, we conducted testing for impairments of body structures, activity, and participation, according to the ICF checklist. Results: Impairments of body structures was highest in the upper and lower extremity. 2) Mobility, domestic life, and self care were more limited. 3) Also, the structure related to movement showed correlation with mobility, domestic life, and self care. Conclusion: We observed differences in participation and activities of persons with disabilities Living at Home depending on the impairments of body structures. After thorough review of the status of Disabled Persons Living at Home, we decided to appropriate support and social services.

Keywords

References

  1. KIHASA. 2008 National survey on persons with disabilities, 2008. Ministry of Health and Welfare.
  2. WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health(ICF). 2001. Geneva. WHO.
  3. Mandich AD, Polatajko HJ, Rodger S, Rites of passage: Understanding participation of children with developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 2003;22(4):583-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2003.09.011
  4. Cieza A, Geyh S, Kostanjsek N et al. ICF linkage rules: An update based on lessons learned. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2005;37(4):212-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970510040263
  5. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF body functions. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2005;27(4):191-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400008537
  6. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2005;27(6):315-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400008545
  7. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2005;27(9):507-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963828040008552
  8. Schepers VPM, Ketelar M, van de Port IGL et al. Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2007;29(3):221-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600756257
  9. Hwang SK. Understanding the new international classification of disability and introduction of the concept of functional disability. KLI. 2004;4(2):127-48.
  10. Park SK, Ji HY, Heo JW. Effects of home visiting physical therapy on activites of daily living and function in disabled persons living at home. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2011;23(2):61-8.
  11. Kim WH, Ahn MR, Kim ES et al. Function and environmental factors analysis using ICF(International classification of functioning, disability and health) for people with disabilities. J Korean Acad Rehab Med. 2008;32(1):100-5.
  12. An SH, Park DS, Lee SM. The clinical application of ICF(international classification of functioning, disability and health) for functional ability analysis of stroke patients. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy. 2009;17(4):37-44.
  13. Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health(ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11-12):577-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963828031000137081
  14. Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL et al. Participation survey/mobility: Psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(2):189-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.014
  15. WHO. The ICF checklist: Development and application by classification, assessment, survey and terminology team(CAS). Meeting of head of WHO collaborating centers for the family of international classifications. 2002.
  16. ICF Korea Translated and Published Committee. ICF(international classification of functioning, disability and health) introduction. ICF Open Forum. 2003:59-84.
  17. WHO. ICIDH2 (icidh-1:international classification of impairment, disability and handicap). 1997.
  18. KEAD. 2011 Disability statistics. Ministry of Employment and Labor. 2011.
  19. S Wood-Dauphinee, JI Williams. Reintegration to normal living as a proxy to quality of life. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1987;40(6):491-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90005-1