Korean Journal of Radiology

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Dual-Energy CT with Non-Linear Blending on Abdominal CT Angiography

  • Li, Sulan (Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University) ;
  • Wang, Chaoqin (Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University) ;
  • Jiang, Xiaochen (Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University) ;
  • Xu, Ge (Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University)
  • Received : 2013.11.29
  • Accepted : 2014.05.07
  • Published : 2014.07.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether non-linear blending technique for arterial-phase dual-energy abdominal CT angiography (CTA) could improve image quality compared to the linear blending technique and conventional 120 kVp imaging. Materials and Methods: This study included 118 patients who had accepted dual-energy abdominal CTA in the arterial phase. They were assigned to Sn140/80 kVp protocol (protocol A, n = 40) if body mass index (BMI) < 25 or Sn140/100 kVp protocol (protocol B, n = 41) if $BMI{\geq}25$. Non-linear blending images and linear blending images with a weighting factor of 0.5 in each protocol were generated and compared with the conventional 120 kVp images (protocol C, n = 37). The abdominal vascular enhancements, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and radiation dose were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance test, independent t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Mean vascular attenuation, CNR, SNR and subjective image quality score for the non-linear blending images in each protocol were all higher compared to the corresponding linear blending images and 120 kVp images (p values ranging from < 0.001 to 0.007) except for when compared to non-linear blending images for protocol B and 120 kVp images in CNR and SNR. No significant differences were found in image noise among the three kinds of images and the same kind of images in different protocols, but the lowest radiation dose was shown in protocol A. Conclusion: Non-linear blending technique of dual-energy CT can improve the image quality of arterial-phase abdominal CTA, especially with the Sn140/80 kVp scanning.

Keywords

References

  1. Macovski A, Alvarez RE, Chan JL, Stonestrom JP, Zatz LM. Energy dependent reconstruction in X-ray computerized tomography. Comput Biol Med 1976;6:325-336 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4825(76)90069-X
  2. Alvarez RE, Macovski A. Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerized tomography. Phys Med Biol 1976;21:733-744 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/21/5/002
  3. Goo HW. CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 2012;13:1-11 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.1.1
  4. Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, Grasruck M, Bruder H, Morhard D, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1510-1517 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0517-6
  5. Altenbernd J, Heusner TA, Ringelstein A, Ladd SC, Forsting M, Antoch G. Dual-energy-CT of hypervascular liver lesions in patients with HCC: investigation of image quality and sensitivity. Eur Radiol 2011;21:738-743 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1964-7
  6. Marin D, Nelson RC, Samei E, Paulson EK, Ho LM, Boll DT, et al. Hypervascular liver tumors: low tube voltage, high tube current multidetector CT during late hepatic arterial phase for detection--initial clinical experience. Radiology 2009;251:771-779 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2513081330
  7. Behrendt FF, Schmidt B, Plumhans C, Keil S, Woodruff SG, Ackermann D, et al. Image fusion in dual energy computed tomography: effect on contrast enhancement, signal-to-noise ratio and image quality in computed tomography angiography. Invest Radiol 2009;44:1-6 https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e31818c3d4b
  8. Eusemann C, Holmes DR III, Schmidt B, Flohr TG, Robb R, McCollough C, et al. Dual energy CT: how to best blend both energies in one fused image? SPIE 2008;6918:691803e8
  9. Holmes DR 3rd, Fletcher JG, Apel A, Huprich JE, Siddiki H, Hough DM, et al. Evaluation of non-linear blending in dual-energy computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2008;68:409-413 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.017
  10. Johnson TR. Dual-energy CT: general principles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(5 Suppl):S3-S8 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9116
  11. Primak AN, Giraldo JC, Eusemann CD, Schmidt B, Kantor B, Fletcher JG, et al. Dual-source dual-energy CT with additional tin filtration: dose and image quality evaluation in phantoms and in vivo. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:1164-1174 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3956
  12. Lv P, Lin XZ, Chen K, Gao J. Spectral CT in patients with small HCC: investigation of image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Eur Radiol 2012;22:2117-2124 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2485-3
  13. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174 https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  14. Chandarana H, Godoy MC, Vlahos I, Graser A, Babb J, Leidecker C, et al. Abdominal aorta: evaluation with dual-source dual-energy multidetector CT after endovascular repair of aneurysms--initial observations. Radiology 2008;249:692-700 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2492080359
  15. Okayama S, Seno A, Soeda T, Takami Y, Kawakami R, Somekawa S, et al. Optimization of energy level for coronary angiography with dual-energy and dual-source computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:901-909 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9897-z
  16. Graser A, Johnson TR, Chandarana H, Macari M. Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen. Eur Radiol 2009;19:13-23 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1122-7
  17. Kalva SP, Sahani DV, Hahn PF, Saini S. Using the K-edge to improve contrast conspicuity and to lower radiation dose with a 16-MDCT: a phantom and human study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:391-397 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200605000-00008
  18. Kartje JK, Schmidt B, Bruners P, Mahnken AH. Dual energy CT with nonlinear image blending improves visualization of delayed myocardial contrast enhancement in acute myocardial infarction. Invest Radiol 2013;48:41-45 https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182749b38
  19. Hwang HJ, Seo JB, Lee JS, Song JW, Kim SS, Lee HJ, et al. Radiation dose reduction of chest CT with iterative reconstruction in image space - Part I: studies on image quality using dual source CT. Korean J Radiol 2012;13:711-719 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.6.711
  20. Ascenti G, Krauss B, Mazziotti S, Mileto A, Settineri N, Vinci S, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in renal masses: nonlinear versus linear blending. Acad Radiol 2012;19:1186-1193 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.05.010

Cited by

  1. Comparison of noise-optimized linearly blended images and noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic images evaluated by dual-source, dual-energy CT in cardiac vein assessment vol.62, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185120933242