The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of dentin bonding agent formulas on their polymerization quality, and together with tooth tissues on their microleakage and shear bond strength: an explorative 3-step experiment

  • Erfan, Mohmmad (Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Jafarzadeh-Kashi, Tahereh Sadat (Iranian Tissue Bank and Research Center, Department of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, Research Center for Sciences and Technology in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Ghadiri, Malihe (Pharmacist in private practice) ;
  • Rakhshan, Vahid (Iranian Tissue Bank and Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2013.12.31
  • Accepted : 2014.04.29
  • Published : 2014.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. Bonding agents (BA) are the crucial weak link of composite restorations. Since the commercial materials' compositions are not disclosed, studies to formulize the optimum ratios of different components are of value. The aim of this study was to find a proper formula of BAs. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This explorative experimental in vitro study was composed of 4 different sets of extensive experiments. A commercial BA and 7 experimental formulas were compared in terms of degree of conversion (5 experimental formulas), shear bond strength, mode of failure, and microleakage (3 experimental formulas). Statistical analyses were performed (${\alpha}$=.05). The DC of selected formula was tested one year later. RESULTS. The two-way ANOVA indicated a significant difference between the shear bond strength (SBS) of two tissues (dentin vs. enamel, P=.0001) in a way that dentinal bonds were weaker. However, there was no difference between the four materials (P=.283). The adhesive mode of failure was predominant in all groups. No differences between the microleakage of the four materials at occlusal (P=.788) or gingival (P=.508) sites were detected (Kruskal-Wallis). The Mann-Whitney U test showed a significant difference between the microleakage of all materials (3 experimental formulas and a commercial material) together at the occlusal site versus the gingival site (P=.041). CONCLUSION. A formula with 62% bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA), 37% hydroxy ethyl methacrylate (HEMA), 0.3% camphorquinone (CQ), and 0.7% dimethyl-para-toluidine (DMPT) seems a proper formula for mass production. The microleakage and SBS might be respectively higher and lower on dentin compared to enamel.

Keywords

References

  1. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28: 163-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00066-4
  2. Magne P, Douglas WH. Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure: intact versus veneered incisors. Quintessence Int 2000;31:5-18.
  3. Shafiei L, Mojiri P, Ghahraman Y, Rakhshan V. Microleakage of a self-adhesive class v composite on primary and permanent dentitions. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14:461-7. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1345
  4. Khosravanifard B, Nemati-Anaraki S, Faraghat S, Sajjadi SH, Rakhshan H, Rakhshan V. Efficacy of 4 surface treatments in increasing the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to saliva-contaminated direct composites. Orthod Wave 2011;70:65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.odw.2011.02.003
  5. Khosravanifard B, Rakhshan V, Saadatmand A. Effects of blood and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets and evaluating certain methods for reversing the effect of contamination. Orthod Wave 2010;69:156-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.odw.2010.06.001
  6. Jafarzadeh Kashi TS, Erfan M, Rakhshan V, Aghabaigi N, Tabatabaei FS. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Oper Dent 2011;36:608-17. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-386-L
  7. Prasanna N, Pallavi Reddy Y, Kavitha S, Lakshmi Narayanan L. Degree of conversion and residual stress of preheated and room-temperature composites. Indian J Dent Res 2007;18:173-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.35827
  8. Jafarzadeh-Kashi TS, Mirzaii M, Erfan M, Fazel A, Eskandarion S, Rakhshan V. Polymerization behavior and thermal characteristics of two new composites at five temperatures: refrigeration to preheating. J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3:216-20. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.4.216
  9. Cotti E, Scungio P, Dettori C, Ennas G. Comparison of the Degree of Conversion of Resin Based Endodontic Sealers Using the DSC Technique. Eur J Dent 2011;5:131-8.
  10. Antonucci JM, Toth EE. Extent of polymerization of dental resins by differential scanning calorimetry. J Dent Res 1983; 62:121-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620020701
  11. Braem M, Davidson CL, VanHerle G, Van Doren V, Lambrechts P. The relationship between test methodology and elastic behavior of composites. J Dent Res 1987;66:1036-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660050901
  12. Daronch M, Rueggeberg FA, De Goes MF. Monomer conversion of pre-heated composite. J Dent Res 2005;84:663-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400716
  13. Craig RG, Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig's restorative dental materials. 12th ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby Elsevier, 2006.
  14. Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW. Phillips' science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Saunders, 2003.
  15. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. Chicago[etc.]: Quintessence Publishing Co., 2008.
  16. van Noort R. Introduction to dental materials. 3rd ed. Edinburgh; New York: Mosby/Elsevier, 2007.
  17. Roberson TM, Heymann H, Swift, EJ, Sturdevant CM. Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby, 2006.
  18. Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R, Prati C, Biasotto M, Contardo L, Breschi L. Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:525-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00251.x
  19. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30:371-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00064-7
  20. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2003;82:136-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200212
  21. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Tay FR, Kaga M, Kudou Y, Oguchi H, Araki Y, Kubota M. Micromorphological changes in resin-dentin bonds after 1 year of water storage. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:306-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10208
  22. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204
  23. Breschi L, Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Biasotto M, Prati C, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R. Polymerization kinetics of dental adhesives cured with LED: correlation between extent of conversion and permeability. Dent Mater 2007;23:1066-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.040
  24. Usumez S, Buyukyilmaz T, Karaman AI, Gunduz B. Degree of conversion of two lingual retainer adhesives cured with different light sources. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:173-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjh085
  25. McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA. McDonald and Avery's dentistry for the child and adolescent. Maryland Heights, Mo: Mosby/Elsevier. 2011. p. 297-9.
  26. Yoshida K, Greener EH. Effect of photoinitiator on degree of conversion of unfilled light-cured resin. J Dent 1994;22: 296-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90064-7
  27. Kashi TJ, Erfan M, Niasar AN. Comparison of shear bond strength and microleakage of Scotchbond multi-purpose (MP) adhesive system and an experimental Dentin Bonding agent based on standard of ISO TR 11405. J Dent Med 2009;22:69-77.
  28. Taira M, Urabe H, Hirose T, Wakasa K, Yamaki M. Analysis of photo-initiators in visible-light-cured dental composite resins. J Dent Res 1988;67:24-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670010401
  29. Barkmeier WW, Cooley RL. Shear bond strength, microleakage and SEM study of the XR Bond adhesive system. Am J Dent 1989;2:111-5.
  30. Fujisawa S, Kadoma Y, Masuhara E. Effects of photoinitiators for the visible-light resin system on hemolysis of dog erythrocytes and lipid peroxidation of their components. J Dent Res 1986;65:1186-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650091401
  31. Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 1993;18:187-94.
  32. Gilpatrick RO, Ross JA, Simonsen RJ. Resin-to-enamel bond strengths with various etching times. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:47-9.
  33. Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T, Donassollo TA, Sommer L, Strapasson A, Demarco FF. Influence of thermal stress on marginal integrity of restorative materials. J Appl Oral Sci 2008;16:106-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000200005
  34. Silveira de Araujo C, Incerti da Silva T, Ogliari FA, Meireles SS, Piva E, Demarco FF. Microleakage of seven adhesive systems in enamel and dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;7:26-33.
  35. Roberson TM, Heymann H, Swift EJ, Sturdevant CM. Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby. 2006. p. 381-95.
  36. Burrow MF, Thomas D, Swain MV, Tyas MJ. Analysis of tensile bond strengths using Weibull statistics. Biomaterials 2004;25:5031-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.060
  37. Diaz-Arnold AM, Aquilino SA. An evaluation of the bond strengths of four organosilane materials in response to thermal stress. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:257-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90327-2
  38. Kecik D, Cehreli SB, Sar C, Unver B. Effect of acidulated phosphate fluoride and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate application on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2008;78:129-33. https://doi.org/10.2319/122506-529.1
  39. Bouschlicher MR, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA. Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent 1997; 10:279-83.
  40. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:209-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70158-7
  41. Kim MJ, Lim BS, Chang WG, Lee YK, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Phosphoric acid incorporated with acidulated phosphate fluoride gel etchant effects on bracket bonding. Angle Orthod 2005;75:678-84.
  42. Fracasso MDLC, Rios D, Machado MAAM, da Silva SMB, Abdo RCC. Evaluation of marginal microleakage and depth of penetration of glass ionomer cements used as occlusal sealants. J Appl Oral Sci 2005;13:269-74. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572005000300013
  43. Ateyah NZ, Elhejazi AA. Shear bond strengths and microleakage of four types of dentin adhesive materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004;5:63-73.

Cited by

  1. Catechol-Functionalized Synthetic Polymer as a Dental Adhesive to Contaminated Dentin Surface for a Composite Restoration vol.16, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00451
  2. The effect of 4,4'-bis(N,N-diethylamino) benzophenone on the degree of conversion in liquid photopolymer for dental 3D printing vol.7, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.386
  3. Bioinspired Catecholic Primers for Rigid and Ductile Dental Resin Composites vol.10, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b14679
  4. Effects of at-home and in-office bleaching and three composite types (hybrid, microhybrid, and nanofilled) on repair shear bond strength of aged composites: A preliminary study vol.18, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.324020
  5. Synergistic effect of graphene oxide/calcium phosphate nanofiller in a dentin adhesive on its dentin bond integrity and degree of conversion. A scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X‐ vol.84, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23764