DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Surgical treatment planning for the two subtypes of mandibular asymmetry

  • Jeon, Ju-Hong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center)
  • Published : 2014.10.31

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Wolford LM, Hilliard FW, Dugan DJ. Surgical treatment objective. St. Louis, Toronto, Princeton: The CV Mosby; 1985.
  2. Ellis E 3rd. A method to passively align the sagittal ramus osteotomy segments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2125-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.02.005
  3. Yoshida K, Rivera RS, Kaneko M, Kurita K. Minimizing displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:15-8. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.19264
  4. Schwartz HC. Efficient surgical management of mandibular asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:645-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.009
  5. Sekiya T, Nakamura Y, Oikawa T, Ishii H, Hirashita A, Seto K. Elimination of transverse dental compensation is critical for treatment of patients with severe facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:552-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.064
  6. Jeon JH, Ha BG. Presurgical transverse dental decompensation in facial asymmetry patients. Recent Adv Orthod Orthognath Surg 2012;1:27-34.