DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Oral Health Care Program Based on Motivational Interviewing

동기면담을 적용한 구강 관리 프로그램의 효과

  • 한예슬 (남서울대학교 치위생학과) ;
  • 배현숙 (남서울대학교 치위생학과) ;
  • 조영식 (남서울대학교 치위생학과)
  • Received : 2014.05.02
  • Accepted : 2014.07.01
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to use basic data of dental hygiene curriculum with a new technique called motivational interviewing of communication skill to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method of oral health care. In this study, we performed oral health care program that has been made in dental hygiene department to university students. It was assigned to the control group and 66 and 32 experimental group based on the date of the first visit time. It conducted motivational interviewing of a total of three times in the experimental group. The analytical results of the measurements obtained in the oral examination and questionnaires. The results were as follows: The experimental group measured value was reduced after the intervention compared to before the PSR to evaluate the state of periodontal, gingival index, calculus index, plaque control record (PCR; O'Leary plaque index), simple plaque scor of Quantitative Light Induced Fluorescnece Digital measurement value (p<0.05). Experimental group decreased more and more the result of changes in the reduction of the average of the PCR. But control group was reduced to 3 weeks and increased back to the middle 16 weeks. There was also support interaction between the measurement point and the groups (p<0.05). Re-visit adherence of fit, 12.1% in the control group, the experimental group was 43.7% in the period of participation in the oral health care program. Thus, visit adherence of the experimental group was higher. In this study, a group that has motivational interviewing, It was able to confirm the improvement of oral health state. Discussion of the motivational interviewing can be applied to oral health care program.

본 연구는 구강 건강 개선을 위해 효과적인 구강 보건 교육방법을 모색하고자 동기면담이라는 새로운 상담기법을 적용한 구강 관리 프로그램을 진행하였다. 동기면담의 효과를 검증하고, 구강 관리 프로그램 개발의 기초자료로 제시하고자 대학생 98명을 대상으로 구강 관리 프로그램을 시행하였다. 첫 방문 날짜를 기준으로 실험군 32명과 대조군 66명으로 배정하였으며, 실험군에게는 총 3회의 동기면담을 시행한 결과 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 중재 유무에 따라 프로그램 참여 전후의 구강 상태를 비교한 결과 실험군에서 유의한 차이를 나타냈다. 치주상태를 평가하는 PSR, 치은 지수, 치석 지수, 치면세균막 지수, QLF-D 측정값인 SPS 모두 중재 전보다 중재 후에 측정값이 유의하게 감소하였다(p<0.05). 2. 구강 관리 프로그램 시행 기간 총 3회 동안 치면세균막지수값을 측정한 결과 두 집단 간의 차이는 통계적으로 유의하지 않았으나(p>0.05), 3회의 치면세균막 측정 시점 간의 차이는 통계적으로 유의하였으며 집단과 측정 시점간의 교호작용도 유의한 차이를 나타냈다(p<0.05). 3. 구강 관리 프로그램 참여 기간 동안 재방문 준수도는 실험군의 방문 준수도가 높게 나타났다. 또한 프로그램 재방문에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석한 결과 동기면담을 시행한 집단이 시행하지 않은 집단보다 재방문할 가능성이 23.89배 높았으며, 구강 양치액을 사용하는 사람이 사용하지 않는 사람보다 21.73배, 치주상태 측정값 PSR이 큰사람이 12.19배 재방문할 가능성이 높은 것으로 나타났다(p<0.05). 이상의 결과를 종합해 보면, 동기면담의 시행은 구강 상태를 개선하며 그 가운데 치면세균막 감소에 높은 영향력이 있음을 확인할 수 있다. 또한 동기면담을 적용한 집단은 치면세균막 지수가 점차 감소하는 반면 중재를 시행하지 않는 집단은 다시 증가하는 양상을 나타내어 동기면담의 시행이 행동 유지에 관련이 있음을 알 수 있다. 동기면담 시행 집단이 재방문율이 높고, 재방문 준수에 동기면담의 영향력이 있는 것을 확인하였으므로 동기면담은 구강 관리 프로그램에 적용 가능하며 구강건강개선에 영향력 있는 중재로 이용될 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kushnir D, Zusman SP, Robinson PG: Validation of a hebrew version of the oral health impact profile 14. J Public Health Dent 64: 71-75, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2004.tb02730.x
  2. Ramiseier CA, Suvan JE: Health behavior change in the dental practice. 1st ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Iowa, pp.24-58, 2010.
  3. Schmid MO, Salmelli OP: Plaque-removing effect of a toothbrush, dental floss, and a toothpick. J Clin Peridontol 3: 157-165, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1976.tb01863.x
  4. Han SJ, Hwang YS, Yoo JS, Kim YS: A study on oral health awareness, oral health behavior and dental caries among low socio-economic status children: the cases of local childrenʼs center in Incheon. J Dent Hyg Sci 8: 147-153, 2008.
  5. Miller WR: Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behav Ther 11: 147-172, 1983.
  6. Rollnick S, Heather N, Bell A: Negotiating behavior change in medical settings: the development of brief motivational interviewing. J Mental Health 1: 25-37, 1992. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638239209034509
  7. Carl RR. Counseling and psychotherapy: newer concepts in practice, Hakjisa, Seoul, pp.515-517, 2000.
  8. Prochaska JO, Diclemente CC, Norcross JC: In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist 47: 1102-1114, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102
  9. Miller WR, Rollnick S: Motivational interviewing-helping people change. 3th ed. Guilford Pubn, New York, pp.1-29, 2012.
  10. Rollnick S, Butler CC, Jim MC, Paul K, Elwyn G: Consultations about changing behaviour. BMJ 331: 961-963, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7522.961
  11. Miller WR, Rollnick S: Motivational interviewing-preparing people for change. 2th ed. Guilford Pub, New York, pp.35- 40, 2002.
  12. Weinstein P, Harrison R, Benton T: Motivating parents to prevent caries: confirming the beneficial effect of counseling. J Am Dent Assoc 137: 789-793, 2006. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0291
  13. Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Laurritzen T: Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brit J Gen Pract 55: 305-312, 2005.
  14. Koerber A, Crawford J, O'Connell K: The effects of teaching dental students brief motivational interviewing for smokingcessation counseling: a pliot study. J Dent Educ 67: 439-447, 2003.
  15. Jimenez M, Krall EA, Garcia RI, Vokonas PS, Dietrich T: Periodontitis and incidence of cerebrovascular disease in men. Ann Neurol 66: 505-512, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21742
  16. Park MS, Kim JH: A study on awareness of dental treatment and oral health management during the period of pregnancy -focusing on women of childbearing ages and women of childbirth experience-. J Dent Hyg Sci 9: 231-239, 2009.
  17. Bledsoe LK: Smoking cessation: an application of theory of planned behavior to understanding progress through stages of change. Addict Behav 31: 1271-1276, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.08.012
  18. Lalic M, Aleksic E, Gajic M, Millic J, Malesevic D: Does oral health counseling effectively improve oral hygiene of orthodontic patients? Eur J Paediatr Dent 13: 181-186, 2012.
  19. Godard A, Dufour T, Feanne S: Application of self-regulation theory and motivational interview for improving oral hygiene: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol 38: 1099- 1105, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01782.x
  20. Weinstein P, Harrison R, Benton T: Motivating parents to prevent caries in their young children (one-year findings). J Am Dent Assoc 135: 731-738, 2004. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0299
  21. Weinstein P: Motivational interviewing concepts and the relationship to risk management and patient counseling. J Calif Dent Assoc 39: 742-745, 2011.
  22. Harrison R, Wong T: An oral health promotion program for an urban minority population of preschool children. Community Den Oral Epidemiol 31: 392-399, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00001.x
  23. Harrison R, Bention T, Everson S, Winstein P: Effect of motivational interviewing on rates of early childhood caries: a randomized trial. Periatric Dent 29: 16-22, 2007.
  24. Harrison R, Veronneau J, Leroux B: Design and implementation of a dental caries prevention trial in remote Canadian aboriginal communities. Trials 11: 1-9, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-1
  25. Harrison RL, Veronneau J, Leroux B: Effectiveness of maternal counseling in reducing caries in cree children. J Dent Res 91: 1032-1037, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512459758
  26. Jonsson B, Lindberg P, Oscarson N: Improved compliance and self-care in patients with periodontitis-a randomized control trial. Int J Dent Hyg 4: 77-83, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2006.00175.x

Cited by

  1. 치약선택기준에 따른 구매만족, 재구매 의도 및 권유 의사 분석 vol.15, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2015.15.1.77