DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Process of Understanding Force As Used among Two Young Children in Rough-and-Tumble Play When Using Combative Objects

싸움도구를 사용하는 거친신체놀이에서 두 명의 유아들이 물리적 힘을 이해하는 과정

  • Baik, Eunyoung (Dept. of Early Childhood Education, Soongeui Women's College)
  • 백은영 (숭의여자대학교 유아교육과)
  • Received : 2014.07.31
  • Accepted : 2014.10.14
  • Published : 2014.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to elucidate how two young children understand force in rough-and-tumble play. For this purpose, a form of microanalysis(Forman, 2006) was used. They regarded black as the strongest color due to their daily experiences. They assumed that a structure made of black Lego-color-bricks would be strongest and made an experiment of beating it against blocks of other colors. Such repetitive behavior ultimately led them to realize that color had no correlation with strength. They also understood mechanical energy by which a boy's pushing power moves against an object. They tried to strike a bigger or protruding structure and understood that parts might be broken more easily by striking. This experience enabled the boys to realize the principle of resistance. That is to say, in the process of rough-and-tumble play, their misconceptions were gradually removed and they obtained scientific knowledge, including understanding of mechanical energy and the principle of resistance. This study found that two young children constructed knowledge together through the process of tool making and in contending for victory in rough-and-tumble play.

Keywords

References

  1. Baik, E. (2013). Possibility and limitations of the constructive play among four-year-old children: Focused on the meaning of 'Being Strong'. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Barnes, D. (2008). Exploratory talk for learning. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in schools (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
  3. Caillois, R. (1994). Play and human beings. Lee, S. (translation). Seoul: Moonye-Press. (Original published in 1967).
  4. Cho, H., Kim, S., Kim, J., Kim, M., & Kim, N. (2014). Science education for young children (2nd ed.). Seoul: Hakjisa.
  5. Choi, M., Hong, S., Jeon, A., Bae, E., & An, S. (2013). The relationship between young children's engagement in rough-and-tumble play during recess and their display of leadership. The Journal of Eco Early childhood Education, 12(2), 91-112.
  6. Choi, M., Roh, E., Jeong, M., & Ju, B. (2013). The influence of reduction in aggression of young children and interpersonal problem solving ability between outdoor activity of rough and tumble play and general outdoor activity play. Journal of Future Early Childhood Education, 20(4), 21-44.
  7. Chung, D. (1998). Research on art and area of 'represent the imaginary' to improve the teaching and learning. Journal of Elementary Education, 12, 309-345.
  8. Corsaro, W. A. (1992). Interpretive reproduction in children's peer cultures. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 160-177. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786944
  9. Cutnell, J. D., & Johnson, K. W. (2014). Introduction to physics. (9th ed.). A compilation committee of physical science textbook. (translation). Paju: Cheongmoongak. (Original published in 2012).
  10. Forman, G. (2006). Constructive play. In D. P. Fromberg & D. Bergen (Eds.), Play from birth to twelve: Contexts, perspectives, and meanings (2nd ed., pp. 103-109). New York: Routledge.
  11. Forman, G., & Landry, C. (1999). Research on early science education. In L. R. Williams (Series Ed.) & C. Seefeldt (Ed.), The early childhood curriculum: A review of current research (3rd ed., pp. 133-158). New York: Teachers College Press.
  12. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricular. New York: Teachers College Press.
  13. Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego: Academic Press.
  14. Ha, H. (2009). A study of teachers' perceptions toward preschool boys' rough and tumble play and peer play behaviors. Unpublished master's thesis, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea.
  15. Han, Y. (2010). Science education for young children. Seoul: Changjisa.
  16. Hanson, N. R. (1995). Patterns of discovery. Song, J., & Cho, K. (translation). Seoul: Minumsa. (Original published in 1958).
  17. Humphreys, A. P., & Smith, P. K. (1987). Rough and tumble, friendship, and dominance in school children: Evidence for continuity and change with age. Child Development, 58, 201-212. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130302
  18. Hyun, E. (2008). Teachable moments: Reconceptualizing curricula understandings. Son, Y., Kim, N., Nam, M., Jung, H., Lee, K., & Son, W. (translation). Goyang: Seohyunsa. (Original published in 2006).
  19. Jeon, S. (2011). A comparison between fathermother perceptions of young children's rough-and-tumble play. Unpublished master's thesis, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea.
  20. Jewett, J. W., & Serway, R. A. (2013). Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics. (8th ed.). A compilation committee of physical science textbook. (translation). Seoul: Cengage Learning Korea Ltd. (Original published in 2010).
  21. Jo, H. (1994). Science concepts easy to understand wrong. Seoul: Jeonpagwahaksa.
  22. Johnson, J. E., Christie, J. F., & Yawkey, T. D. (1999). Play and early childhood development. New York: Longman.
  23. Jones, N. B. (1976). Rough-and-tumble play among nursery school children. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 352-363). New York: Basic Books.
  24. Kim, K. (2002). Children's change in scientific concepts and attitude during science activities based on the spontaneous inquiry. Unpublished master's thesis, Chungang University, Seoul, Korea.
  25. Kim, K., & Na, K. (2013). An analysis of teacher and children co-constructing understanding through explanation during free choice activities. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 33(1), 191-214.
  26. Kim, S. (2007). A study on the analysis of scientific misconception in early young children. Korea Journal of Child Care and Education, 48, 59-83.
  27. Kim, S. (2008). Development on the constructive teaching model for young children's scientific conceptual change. Korea Journal of Child Care and Education, 52, 1-19.
  28. Kim, S. (2013). Constructive early science education. Goyang: Seohyunsa.
  29. Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2002). Reflecting on scientific thinking as goal of early science education. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 22(2), 247-269.
  30. Kim, Y. (2007). The relationship between children's rough-and-tumble play and social competence. Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  31. Koh, B. (2003). Power: Research of power. Seoul: Sowha.
  32. Koh, Y. (2009). An investigation on the aspects, factors and the meaning of children's rough and tumble play. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  33. Koh, Y., & Ohm, J. (2010). An investigation into the aspects and factors at work in children's rough and tumble play. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 31(4), 75-90.
  34. Koh, Y., & Ohm, J. (2014). The importance of teacher interactions with children during rough-and-tumble play. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 34(1), 59-89. https://doi.org/10.18023/kjece.2014.34.1.003
  35. Kwak, H. (2002). Childhood science teaching for conceptual change from the constructivist perspectives. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 6(1), 87-109.
  36. Kwon, J., Kim, B., Kang, N., Choi, B., Kim, H., Paik, S., et al. (2012). Science education. Paju: Kyoyookbook Press.
  37. Kwon, J., Kim, B., Woo, C., Chung, W., Chung, J., & Choi, B. (1998). The theory of science education. Paju: Kyoyookbook Press.
  38. Kwon, Y., Jeong, J., Shin, D., Lee, J., Lee, I., & Byun, J. (2011). The creation and evaluation of science knowledge. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  39. Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  40. Lee, J. (2007). The relationship between boys' and girls' rough-and-tumble play and peer competence. Unpublished master's thesis, Duksung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  41. Lee, K. (2006). Kindergarten teachers' perceptions on science education. Journal of Science Education, 19, 205-220.
  42. Lee, K. (2013). The directions and tasks of early childhood science education. The Journal of Education, 33(1), 161-189.
  43. Lee, S. (1992). A qualitative study on children's playgrounds and play behaviors. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 14(1), 109-132.
  44. Lee, S. (1998). Rough-and-tumble play and social competence in preschool children. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 19(1), 131-140.
  45. Lee, S. (2010). Early childhood teachers' recognition on value and behavioral characteristics of rough and tumble play. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National Open University, Seoul, Korea.
  46. Lee, S., & Yim, M. (1998). The research of rough-and-tumble play: Focus on outdoor play among six-old-year children. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 36(3), 255-279.
  47. Lee, W. (2010). Changes and meaning of physical play from supporting process of early childhood rough and tumble play. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 15(1), 413-436.
  48. Lee, Y. (2009). Young children's rough and tumble play about the perceptions of parents and teachers. Unpublished master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  49. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
  50. Moon, S. (2008). A study on rough and tumble play of kindergarten teachers. Unpublished master's thesis, Silla University, Pusan, Korea.
  51. Ninjago (2014. 06. 04 withdraw) [http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%A0% 88%EA%B3%A0]
  52. Oh, M. (2011a). Early childhood classroom discourse as a cognitive activity on the social plane. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 16(3), 129-156.
  53. Oh, M. (2011b). A teacher's strategies for supporting children's co-construction of theories in 'science talk'. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 16(4), 1-32.
  54. Ohm, J. (2002). The effect of the structure of play materials on young children's intersubjectivity in social dramatic play. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 22(3), 195-215.
  55. Park, C., & Lee, K. (2006). Discussion about educational continuity of national science education curricula in kindergarten and elementary school. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 10(3), 149-172.
  56. Pellegrini, A. (1988). Elementary-school children's rough and tumble play and social competence. Development Psychology, 24, 802-806. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.802
  57. Pellegrini, A. (1989). Elementary-school children's rough and tumble play. Early Children Research Quarterly, 4, 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(89)80006-7
  58. Pellegrini, A. D., & Boyd, B. (1993). The role of play in early childhood development and education: Issues in definition and function. In S. Spodek (Ed.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (pp. 105-121). New York: Macmillan.
  59. Ryu, J., & Kwon, S. (2005). The knowledge sharing process on a collaborative problem solving task with a concept map. Journal of Educational Technology, 21(2), 29-60.
  60. Schwartz, S., & Copeland, S. (2013). Connecting emergent curriculum and standards in the early childhood classroom. Park, E., Shin, E., Kim, H., & Lee, J. (translation). Seoul: Hakjisa. (Original published in 2010).
  61. Shawn, M. G., Russell, H. Y., & Bruce, K. B. (2000). The psychology of learning science. Gwon, S., & Im, C. (translation). Seoul: Sigmapress. (Original published in 1991).
  62. Song, J. (2003). Constructivist science education and the map of students' physics misconceptions. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 42(2), 87-109.
  63. Song, J., Kim, I., Kim, Y., Kwon, S., Oh, W., & Park, J. (2005). Learners' physical misconception maps. Seoul: Cengage Learning Korea Ltd.
  64. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  65. Suh, D., & Ryu, W. (2006). New introduction to physics (6th ed.). Seoul: Hanbit Intellectual Property Center.
  66. Suh, J., & Ohm, J. (2013). Kindergarten teachers' perceptions of rough and tumble play and the teaching strategies toward that play. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 17(3), 201-224.
  67. Vygotsky, L. (2014). Children's imaginary and creativity. Committe on Vygotsky's work. (translation). Seoul: Salimter. (Original published in 1930).
  68. Wang, H., & Lee, K. (2011). Teachers' recognition on preschool children's rough and tumble play. Journal of Physical Education & Sports Science, 27, 11-23.
  69. Woo, J. (2003). A study on teachers' cognition of young children's rough-and-tumble play and its patterns. Unpublished master's thesis, Chungang University, Seoul, Korea.
  70. Woodard, C., & Davitt, R. (1999). Physical science in early childhood. Cho, E., Ha, S., & Choi, I. (translation). Seoul: Changjisa. (Original published in 1987).