DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of the Seismic Fragility Functions of the High Speed Railway Tunnels in use

기존 고속철도 터널의 지진취약도 함수 개발에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Hongkyoon (Institute of Infrastructure Safety, KISTEC) ;
  • Shin, Chulsik (Institute of Infrastructure Safety, KISTEC) ;
  • Lee, Taehyung (Institute of Infrastructure Safety, KISTEC) ;
  • Lee, Jonggun (Institute of Infrastructure Safety, KISTEC) ;
  • Park, Duhee (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2014.08.06
  • Accepted : 2014.09.17
  • Published : 2014.11.01

Abstract

In this study, the staged seismic performance evaluations were conducted to the 91 high speed railway tunnels in use for checking whether to comply with the recent design criteria or not. In addition, the seismic fragility functions of the tunnels were developed to allow the probabilistic risk assessment. The results of the staged seismic performance evaluations which consist of a preliminary assessment and a detailed assessment, show that the tunnels comply with the recent design criteria. With reference to the results of previous studies, a form of the proposed seismic fragility functions was set as a log-normal distribution by PGA, and the parameters of the functions were determined by using the probability of damage for the design PGA level. The seismic fragility functions were developed for each types (Cut & Cover, NATM) of tunnels. The seismic fragility functions from this study and the existing research results (FEMA, 2004) were compared to evaluate the seismic performance level of the tunnels, as a result the tunnels of this study were relatively superior to the ASSM tunnels on the seismic performance.

본 연구에서는 공용 중인 91개 고속철도 터널을 대상으로 단계별 내진성능평가를 실시하여 설계기준에서 제시하는 목표 내진성능 확보여부를 검토하였다. 또한 지진취약도 함수도 함께 개발하여 지진규모에 따른 시설물의 확률론적 피해예측이 가능하도록 하였다. 단계별 내진성능평가는 내진성능 예비평가 및 상세평가 순으로 실시하였으며, 평가결과 대상터널들은 설계기준 수준의 내진성능을 확보하는 것으로 분석되었다. 지진취약도 함수는 최대지반가속도(Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA)를 기준으로 한 대수 정규분포형태로 설정하였으며, 함수도출방법은 설계 PGA수준에 대한 손상발생확률을 이용하여 취약도함수의 모수를 결정하는 방식으로 하였다. 손상발생 검토부재는 라이닝콘크리트로서, 대상터널을 굴착식 터널(NATM 터널) 및 개착식 터널로 구분하여 각각에 대한 손상수준별 지진취약도 함수를 개발하였다. 이번연구에서 도출된 지진취약도 함수와 기존연구결과(FEMA, 2004)와의 비교 분석을 통하여 대상터널의 내진성능확보수준을 평가하였으며, 그 결과 대상터널이 기존연구의 대상인 재래식 터널(American Steel Support Method, ASSM)에 비하여 상대적으로 내진성능이 우수한 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ang, A. H. S. and Tang, W. H. (2006), Probability concepts in engineering : emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering, John Willy & Sons., pp. 105-194.
  2. Argyroudis, S. A. and Pitilakis, K. D. (2012), Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 35, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.004
  3. Choi, I. K., Ahn, S. M. and Jeon, Y. S. (2006), Seismic fragility analysis of PSC containment building by nonlinear analysis, Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 63-74 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2006.10.1.063
  4. FEMA (2004), HAZUS-MH technical manual, pp. 7-1-24.
  5. Jeong, C. G. and Park, D. H. (2009), Selection of input earthquake motion for dynamic analysis, Korean Geo-Environmental Conference 2009, September 11, 2009/Seoul/Korea, pp. 187-195 (in Korean).
  6. Kennedy, R. P. and Ravindra, M. K. (1984), Seismic fragility for nuclear power plant risk studies, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 79, pp. 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(84)90188-2
  7. Kim, H. K. (2014), Development of the seismic fragility functions of the tunnels on the gyeongbu high speed railway, Master's thesis, Hanyang Univ. (in Korean).
  8. Kim, M. K., Choun, Y. S., Choi, I. K. and Oh, K. H. (2009a), Seismic fragility analysis of substation systems by using the fault tree method, Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 47-58 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2009.13.2.047
  9. Kim, M. K., Hahm, D. G. and Choi, I. K. (2009b), Seismic fragility evaluation for railway bridge structures using results of a safety factor, Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 57-65 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2009.13.4.057
  10. KISTEC, KRRI and CTC Co. (2013), Seismic performance evaluation & retrofitting method planning for rapid-transit railway in use, pp. III.1-139 (in Korean).
  11. KR (2011), The design standard of railway, pp. 2-22-29, 7-21-26 (in Korean).
  12. MLIT (2011), The manual of seismic performance evaluation & improvement seismic performance for the existing tunnel, pp. 1-62 (in Korean).
  13. Park, D. H., Kwak, D. Y. and Jeong, C. G. (2009), Development of new probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and seismic coefficients of korea "Part I: application and verification of a novel probabilistic seismic hazard analysis procedure", Korean Geo-Environmental Society, Vol. 10, No. 7, pp. 103-109 (in Korean).
  14. Salmon, M., Wang, J., Jones, D. and Wu, Ch. (2003), Fragility formulations for the BART system, in: Proceedings of 6th U.S. Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, TCLEE, Long Beach, pp. 183-192.

Cited by

  1. Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of Rock Mountain Tunnel vol.18, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001080