신재생에너지 (New & Renewable Energy)

  • 제10권3호
  • /
  • Pages.39-46
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1738-3935(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-9999(eISSN)
한국신·재생에너지학회 (Korean Society for New and Renewable Energy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

태국 열대몬순기후 조건에서 PV모듈 기술별 성능특성 비교 연구

Comparative Study on Performance of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Modules in Tropical Monsoon Climate under Thailand condition

  • 투고 : 2014.08.27
  • 심사 : 2014.09.17
  • 발행 : 2014.09.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The performances of three different types of photovoltaic (PV) module technologies namely, copper-indium-diselenide (CIGS), mono-crystalline silicon (mo-Si) and amorphous silicon (a-Si) have been comparatively studied in the grid-connected system for more than a year under the tropical monsoon climate of Thailand. The yields, performance ratios and system efficiencies for the respective PV module technologies have been calculated and a comparison is presented here. The performance ratios of the initial operation year for CIGS showed highest among the compared technologies under Thailand climate conditions by marking 97.0% while 89.6% for a-Si and 81.5% for mo-Si. Although mo-Si has shown highest efficiencies all over the period, under the testing conditions, the operating efficiency of mo-Si was down-graded from its reference value mainly due to high operating temperature and the efficiency of the tested CIGS module was also found as high as that of mo-Si in the study. Accordingly, outdoor assessment shows that CIGS modules have demonstrated high performance in terms of yields and performance ratios in Thailand climate conditions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A. J. Carr, T. L. Pryor, 2004, "A comparison of the performance of different PV module types in temperate climates", Solar Energy, Vol. 76, pp. 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2003.07.026
  2. P. Kamkird, N. Ketjoy, W. Rakwichian, S. Sukchai, 2012, "Investigation on Temperature Coefficients of Three Types Photovoltaic Moduel Technologies under Thailand Operating Condition", Procedia Engineering, Vol. 32. pp. 376-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1282
  3. M. Z. Hussin, A. M. Omar, Z. M. Zain, S. Shaari, 2013, "Performance of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System in Equatorial Rainforest Fully Humid Climate of Malaysis", International Journal of Applied Power Engineering (IJAPE), Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 105-114.
  4. N. Amon, C, W, Lung, K. Sopian, 2009, "A practical field study of various solar cells on their performance in Malaysia", Renewable Energy, Vol. 34, pp. 1939-1946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.12.005
  5. Kottek, M., J. Grieser, C. Beck, B. Rudolf, F. Rubel, 2006, "World Map of Koppen-Geiger climate classification updated", Meteorologische Zeitschrift, Vol. 15, pp. 259-263. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
  6. Alasdair Miller, 2012, "Utility Scale Solar Power Plant", International Finance Corporation, pp. 25-28.
  7. M.Gostein, L. Dunn, 2011, "Light Soaking Effects on Photovoltaic Modules: Overview and Literature Reivew", Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), pp. 19-24.
  8. M.C. Alonso Garcia, J.L. Balenzategui, 2004, "Estimation of photovoltaic module yearly temperature and performance based on Nominal Operation Cell Tempterature", Renewable Energy, Vol. 29, pp. 1997-2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.03.010
  9. E. Skoplaki, J.A. Palyvos, 2009, "On the temperature dependence of photovoltaic module electrical performance: A review of efficieny/power correlations", Solar Energy, Vol. 83, pp. 614-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2008.10.008

피인용 문헌

  1. 1-year Outdoor Performance of a-Si:H Single-junction Photovoltaic Module of See-through and Curved Type vol.14, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7849/ksnre.2018.3.14.1.048