영재교육연구 (Journal of Gifted/Talented Education)

한국영재학회 (The Korean Society for the Gifted)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

영재와 학습장애영재의 영역적 사고

Domain Thoughts in Gifted Students and Gifted Students with Learning Disabilities

  • 투고 : 2014.09.10
  • 심사 : 2014.10.24
  • 발행 : 2014.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 논문은 학습장애영재 모델(Song & Porath, 2011)의 실증적 검증 차원으로, 읽기, 쓰기, 수학에서 학습장애가 없는 영재와 학습장애영재가 보이는 영역적 사고를 조사하였다. 두 그룹의 영재들로부터 인터뷰 자료를 수집하였고 분야적 사고 측면에서 분석하였다. 그 결과 영재는 읽기, 쓰기, 수학에서 비교적 균형 잡힌 영역적 사고를 나타낸 반면 학습장애영재는 특정 분야에서 약한 영역적 사고를 보였다. 뿐만 아니라 오직 학습장애영재만이 읽기, 쓰기, 수학의 각각의 분야 내에서 서로 상반된 태도를 보였는데 그들은 같은 분야 내에서 긍정과 부정의 감정을 동시에 드러냈다. 이 논문은 학습장애영재 모델에서 제시하고 있는 인지 메커니즘을 통해 두 영재집단의 차이점들을 설명하고 영재 선발과 교육에 대한 새로운 접근 방법을 제안하고 있다.

As an empirical test of a model of giftedness with learning disabilities (Song & Porath, 2011), this paper investigated domain thoughts of gifted students without learning disabilities and gifted students with learning disabilities (GLD) in reading, writing, and math. Gifted students in each group were interviewed and the data were analyzed for domain thoughts. The results showed that the former group of gifted students exhibited domain thoughts in a more balanced manner, whereas GLD students showed large discrepancies between domain thoughts; they showed weak specific domain thoughts in contrast to strong other domain thoughts. They also showed ambivalent attitudes even in a domain activity; they presented positive and negative thoughts at the same time. With a comprehensive explanation of the differences between the two groups of gifted students through a cognitive mechanism presented in the model of GLD model, this paper provides new approaches for identification and education of gifted students and GLD students.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ackerman, P. T., Anhalt, J. M., & Dykman, R. A. (1986). Arithmetic automatization failure in children with attention and reading disorders: Associations and sequela. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948601900409
  2. Baum, S., Owen, S., & Dixon, J. (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled: From identification to practical intervention strategies. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  3. Bender, W. N. (2001). Learning disabilities: Characteristics, identification, and teaching strategies (4th ed.), Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  4. Bickerton, G. (1994, June). Narrative knowledge as revealed in children's perceptions of learning. Paper presented at the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, The University of Calgary.
  5. Bireley, M., Languis, M., & Williamson, T. (1992). Physiological uniqueness: A new perspective on the learning disabled/gifted child. Roeper Review, 15, 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199209553477
  6. Brody, L. E., & Mills, C. J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 282-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000304
  7. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. New York: Academic.
  9. Case, R. (Ed.) (1992). The mind's staircase. Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children's thought and knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  10. Case, R., Demetriou. A., Platsidou. M., & Kazi. S. (2001). Integrating concepts and tests of intelligence from the differential and developmental traditions. Intelligence, 29, 307-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(00)00057-X
  11. Cawley, J. F., Fitzmaurice, A. M., Shaw, R. A., Kahn, H., & Bates, H. (1979). Math word problems: Suggestions for LD students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 25-41.
  12. Ceci, S. J. (1989). On domain specificity…More or less general and specific constraints on cognitive development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 131-142.
  13. Coleman, M. R. (2005). Academic strategies that work for gifted students with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990503800105
  14. Demetriou, A.. (2002). Tracing psychology's invisible giant and its visible guards. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp.3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Fetzer, E. A. (2000). The gifted/learning disabled child: A guide for teachers and parents. Gifted Child Today, 23, 44-53.
  16. Fletcher, J. M. (2005). Predicting math outcomes: Reading predictors and comorbidity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 308-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380040501
  17. Fletcher, J. M., Foorman, B. R., Boudousquie, A. B., Barnes, M. A., Schatschneider, C., & Francis D. J. (2002). Assessment of reading and learning disabilities: A research-based, intervention-oriented approach. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 27-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00093-0
  18. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
  19. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
  20. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD students. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323-344). New York: Guilford.
  21. Jensen, A. P. (2002). g: definition and substantiation. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp.39-53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  22. Jordan, N. C., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (1996). Calculation abilities in young children with different patterns of cognitive functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 53-64.
  23. Lerner, J. W., & Jones, B. (2011). Learning disabilities and related disorders (12th ed.). New York: Wadsworth Publishing.
  24. Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. Volume 1: A report of the congress of the United States by the US Commissioner of Education, Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  25. Matthews, D. J. (1993). Domains of development: Linguistic giftedness understood contextually. Exceptionality Education Canada, 3, 1-23.
  26. Matthews, D. J. (1997). Diversity in domains of development: Research findings and their implications for gifted identification and programming. Roeper Review, 19, 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199709553821
  27. Mayes, S. D., & Calhoun, S. L. (2007). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-third and - fourth edition: predictors of academic achievement in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 234-249. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.2.234
  28. McKeough, A., & Sanderson, A. (1996). Teaching storytelling: A microgenetic analysis of developing narrative competency. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 6, 157-192. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.6.2.04tea
  29. Meek, M. (2003). What more needs saying about imagination? Reading Teacher, 57, 105-111.
  30. Munro, J. (2002). Understanding and identifying gifted learning disabled students. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 20-30.
  31. Porath, M. (2009). Fostering social expertise in early childhood. Early Child Developmental and Care, 179, 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430600989098
  32. Raskind, W. (2001). Current understanding of the genetic basis of reading and spelling disability. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 141- 157. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511240
  33. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition, Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-186.
  34. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd). Mansfield: Creative Learning Press.
  35. Richek, M., Jennings, J., Caldwell, J., & Lerner, J. (2002). Reading problems: Assessment and teaching strategies. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  36. Siegel, I. S. (2005). Basic cognitive processes and reading disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Learning Disabilities (pp. 158-181). New York: Guilford.
  37. Silverman, L. K. (1989a). Invisible gifts, invisible handicaps. Roeper Review, 12, 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198909553228
  38. Silverman, L. K. (1989b). The visual-spatial learner. Preventing School Failure, 34, 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.1989.9944547
  39. Silverman, L. K. (1993). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver, CO: Love.
  40. Snelling, A. (2007). Gifted children with learning disabilities need focused tutoring. Accessed Nov. 27, 2007. http://www. accessibility.com.au/news.
  41. Song, K. H. (2009). Understanding giftedness in a cognitive mechanism: A candidate for a universally agreed definition of giftedness. Journal of Talented and Gifted Education, 19, 261-277.
  42. Song, K. H. (2010). Understanding autism in a cognitive mechanism: Why and how the characteristics of autism appear. Korean Journal of Special Education, 45, 115-130.
  43. Song, K. H., & Porath, M. (2005). Common and domain-specific cognitive characteristics of gifted students: An integrated model of human abilities. High Ability Studies, 16, 229-246.
  44. Song, K. H. (2011). General and domain specific cognitive abilities of gifted students with learning disabilities (GLD): Understanding GLD in an integrated model of human abilities. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 10, 161-188.
  45. Spearman, C. (1923). The nature of intelligence and the principles of cognition. London: MacMillan.
  46. Springer, S. P., & Deutsch, G. (1985). Left brain, right brain. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  47. Stanley, J. C. (1976). Use of tests to discover talent. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Intellectual Talent: Research and development (pp. 3-22). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  48. Sternberg, R. (1988). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. .
  49. Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 4. The gifted child grows up. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  50. Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children. New York: Basic Books.