DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국의 연속보호체계형 노인주거환경(CCRCs)의 개발 및 계획을 위한 기초적 연구 - 한국사례를 중심으로 -

The Fundamental Study for Development and Planning of Korean Style Continuing Care Retirement Communities - With Focused on Case Study in Korea -

  • 김미희 (전남대학교 생활환경복지학과, 전남대학교 생활과학연구소) ;
  • 오지영 (전남대학교 대학원 생활환경복지학과)
  • 투고 : 2014.07.25
  • 심사 : 2014.10.16
  • 발행 : 2014.10.25

초록

This study aims to develop the Korean types of continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs). CCRC is well evaluated as a residence that applies aging-in place concept, which is ideal for senior housing. Recently, in USA the CCRCs in which the increasing seniors' population and older households are guaranteed to get continuous protection without moving regardless of their deteriorating health are increasing. In Korea, CCRCs have emerged but not well developed in status quo. We conducted case study using three facilities located at Seoul and its suburbs in Korea to compare five categories such as application of 'aging in place' concept, location, architectural features, services or programs, and management. This study is expected to be used basic materials for CCRCs' complex and architectural planning, management strategies, and services or programs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alexander, K. (2003). Grandparents are Returning to College, to Retire. New York Times, May 11, 2003.
  2. An, E. H. (2013). A study on the elderly housing facilities to improve the quality of life for the aged - focused on the college/university linkage in retirement communities. The Architectural Institute of Korea, 29(8), 87-94.
  3. Barratt, J. (2000). The Information Needs of Elderly, Disabled Elderly People, and their Carers. Monograph, Disability Information Trust, Oxford.
  4. Brecht, S. B. (1994). Continuing-care retirement communities. In W. E. Folts & D. E. Yeatts (Eds.), Housing and the Aging Population-Options of the New Century. New York & London: Garland Publishing, Inc. 145-168.
  5. Groger, L., & Kinny, J. (2006). CCRC here we come! reasons for moving to a continuing care retirement community. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 20(4), 79-101.
  6. Harrison, A., &, Tsao, T. C. (2006). Enlarging the academic community. Society for College and University Planning, Jan-Mar. 20-30.
  7. Kim, Y. Y. (2009). Senior Housing Welfare Facilities. SB21.
  8. Kwak, I. S. (2001). Characteristics of continuing care retirement communities in U.S.A., Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 39(12), 91-106.
  9. Lee, K. Y. (2003). Introduction to living environment for the aged in the United States. anc Architectural & Urban Research Information Center, 124-135.
  10. Omoto, A. M., & Aldrich, C. D. (2006). Retirement community life: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 26, 283-303.
  11. Park, M. A. (2009). A study on local connection types of retirement communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Yonsei, Seoul.
  12. Park, M. A., Cho, Y. K., & Yoon, Y. H. (2012). A study on the program of ccrc's common space for healthcare service of elderly. Proceeding of 2012 Spring Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 211-212.
  13. Park, M. A., Lee, Y. S., & Lee, S. J. (2010). Types of local engagement in retirement communities - a content analysis on ccrc cases. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 21(1), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2010.21.1.171
  14. Pastalan, L. (2001). Higher Education as Part of an Active Retirement: Possible Roles for the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Presentation, April 11, 2001. Retrieved September 23, 2005, from the World Wide Web: www.uncg.edu/apl/active_retire_4-01.pdf.
  15. Sheen, D. K. (2010). A checklist for the community space in the continuing care retirement community (ccrc). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sangmyung, Seoul.
  16. Sherwood, S., Ruchlin, H. S., & Sherwood, C. C. (1990). CCRCs: An option for aging in place. In D. Tilson (Ed.), Aging in Place: Supporting the Frail Elderly in Residential Environmnets. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company Glenview. 125-164.
  17. Skurla, J. A. (2007). 'UMD University for Seniors Residential Community Phase 1: Overview of Possible Models for University of Minnesota/Duluth'. for Brownlee Adviwory Board. 2007.
  18. Song, J. H. (2013). A study on the urban elderly housing for community integration, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  19. Walters, E. J. C. (1994). The Consumers' directory of continuing care retirement communities. Washington D.C. American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging.
  20. Yoo, S. H., Kim, J. T., & Choi, S. H. (2008). A Study on the design proposal for the independence residence nursing home (ccrc type). Proceeding of 2008 Spring Conference of Korean institute of interior design, 182-185.
  21. Young, C. A. & Brewer, K. P. (2001) Marking continuing care retirement communities: a model of residents' perceptions of quality. Journal of Hospitality and Leisure Marketing the Haworth Press, P134.
  22. Statistics Korea(2010). Estimated Future Population.
  23. www.americareusa.net
  24. www.theheritage.co.kr
  25. www.n-tower.co.kr
  26. http://www.sst.co.kr/
  27. http://www.carepathways.com/checklist-comucitiesp.cfm

피인용 문헌

  1. An Analysis of University-based Continuing Care Retirement Communities’ Services and Programs Management : With a Focus on Three Cases in the United States vol.28, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2017.28.2.075
  2. Middle-Class Baby-Boomers’ Preferred Characteristics of Continuing Care Retirement Communities vol.28, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2017.28.3.075
  3. Baby-boomers’ Opinions Analysis about the Services and Programs of the Independent Living in the Continuing Care Retirement Communities vol.28, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2017.28.4.085
  4. Baby-Boomers’ Preferences for the Services and Programs of Assisted Living Unit and Nursing Home in the Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs) vol.29, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2018.29.2.001