DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of the Discipline of Mathematics Education in Secondary School Mathematics Teacher Certificate Examination

중등교사 임용시험 수학교과교육학 기출 문항 분석

  • Received : 2014.07.17
  • Accepted : 2014.10.02
  • Published : 2014.10.31

Abstract

This study aims at what is required knowledge and ability to pre-service math teachers in teacher certificate examination. First, the items are analyzed and among questions of discipline of mathematics education in the last five years are analyzed and classified. Second, an analytical framework suitable for item analysis is examined and the items are analysed by the analytical framework. Finally, helpful implications for discipline of mathematics education assessment can be drawn from this study. It is found that the discipline of mathematics education assessment has the following characteristics: 1) It assesses specific content of the assessment component; 2) It assesses a teacher's theoretical knowledge, practical knowledge and creative knowledge in terms of teaching ability; 3) There are six cognitive assessments; 4) There is an item for difficulty adjustment.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 전북대학교

References

  1. L. Anderson, D. Krathwohl, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Addison Wesley Longman, 2001.
  2. B. S. Bloom, The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I, Cognitive domain, New York: David McKay, 1956.
  3. Byun J., Choi B., Trend analysis of secondary school mathematics teacher certification examination, The Korean Journal for History of Mathematics 25(3) (2012), 119-140.(변지수, 최병옥, 중등교사 임용시험 수학교과 내용학 문항의 출제 경향 분석, 한국수학사학회지 25(3) (2012), 119-140.)
  4. J. Dewey, (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education, 1904. In M. L. Brrowan(Ed), Teacher education in America: a documentary history, New york: teacher' college Press, 1971.
  5. P. L. Grossman, The making of a teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher education, New York: Teachers College Press, 1990.
  6. Han H. C., Implications of a Study on the Secondary Written Assessment of Teaching Skills in New York for t he Korean Teacher Certificate Examinations, The Journal of Korean Education 39(2) (2012), 129-155.(한혜정, 미국 뉴욕 주 교원임용 중등 교수역량 지필평가가 우리나라 교원임용시험에 주는 시사점 탐색, 한국교육 39(2) (2012), 129-155.)
  7. J. Hiebert, P. Lefevre, Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis, 1986. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge the case of mathematics, Hillsdale(NJ): Lawrence Erbaum, 1-27.
  8. Ko E. A., An Analysis of the part of Mathematics Education in the Selection Examination for Secondary School Teachers, Unpublished master's thesis of Ulsan University, 2011.(고은아, 중등임용고사 수학교육학 분야 문항 분석, 울산대학교 석사학위논문, 2011.)
  9. Lee I. J et al, Study on the development of teaching degree and specification assessment areas and evaluation of teaching skill of mathematics of display the subjects in secondary school teacher certificate examination on reforming the 2009 academic year, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report CRE 2008-6-2, 2008.(이인제 외, 2009학년도 개편 중등교사임용후보자선정경쟁시험 표시과목 수학의 교사 자격 기준 개발과 평가 영역 상세화 및 수업 능력 평가 연구, 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 CRE 2008-6-2, 한국교육과정평가원.)
  10. Lee I. J et al, Study on the system of the questions and scoring in secondary school teacher certificate examination on reforming the 2009 academic year, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report CRE 2008-9-1, 2008.(이인제 외, 2009학년도 개편 중등교사신규 임용후보자선정경쟁시험의 출제.채점 체제 연구, 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 CRE 2008-9-1, 한국교육과정평가원.)
  11. Lee S. J., An Analysis of the Secondary School Mathematics Teacher Selection Test, Unpublished master's thesis of Ulsan University, 2011.(이수진, 수학 중등교원 임용고사 기출문항 분석-2009학년도-2011학년도 문항을 중심으로-, 울산대학교 석사학위논문, 2011.)
  12. R. J. Marzano, Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press, 2001.
  13. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Notice, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology 2008-117, 2008.(교육과학기술부, 교육과학기술부고시 제2008-117호, 표시과목의 대학의 관련학부 (전공.학과) 및 기본이수과목 또는 분야, 2008.)
  14. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Press release, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology 2012.02.15, 2012.(교육과학기술부, 교사신규채용제도 개선, 2012.2.15 보도자료, 2012.)
  15. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development, Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development' ordinance 2007-914, 2007.(교육인적자원부, 교육인적자원부령 제914호. 교육공무원 임용후보자 선정경쟁시험규칙 일부개정령, 2007.10.1, 2007.)
  16. D. Moseley et al, Frameworks for Thinking: A Handbook for Teaching and Learning, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  17. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: Author, 2000.
  18. Park S. H. et al, The questions of manual of the College Scholastic Ability Test, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, 2005.(한국교육과정평가원, 대학수학능력시험출제 매뉴얼, 한국교육과정평가원, 2005.)
  19. L. S. Shulman, Paradigms and research program in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective, 1986. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook on research on teaching mathematics and learning (3rd ed.), New York: Macmillan.